Transvaginal Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Laparoscopic Uterine Lateral Suspension
A Prospective, Observational Trial of Transvaginal Uterine Suspension With the New Minimally Invasive Uterine Suspension
1 other identifier
observational
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transvaginal or transabdominal surgeries are current choices of uterus-preserving surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. Laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension, a modified surgical approach of uterine suspension from bilateral abdominal wall fascia, performed with expected safety and simplicity of surgery besides advantages including small wound incision and fast recovery in laparoscopic surgeries. This trial aim to discuss the therapeutic efficacy, long term safety, and adverse events of laparoscopic lateral uterine suspension and compare with the conventional transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation with native tissue repair.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2022
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 26, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 16, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2029
October 21, 2022
October 1, 2022
7.4 years
October 16, 2022
October 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Recurrence
Composite outcome of subjective and objective recurrence of uterine prolapse.
5 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Anatomical outcome
5 years
Functional outcome
5 years
Sexual function outcome
5 years
Urodynamic outcome
6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Safety outcome
5 years
Study Arms (2)
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation
Uterus-preserving transvaginal sacrospinous fixation for apical prolapse. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Interventions
Laparoscopic uterine lateral suspension done with four trocar sites. Fix a 1.5cm\*32cm mesh to uterus at anterior lower segment and bilateral round ligaments by non-absorbable sutures (Surgilon 2-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany), and to lateral abdominal fascia by non-absorbable sutures (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Reperitonization done to avoid mesh exposure in peritoneal cavity. Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Transvaginal sacrospinous fixation done by hand suturing uterus to right sacrospinous ligament with non-absorbable suture (Prolene 1-0, Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany). Concomitant anterior and posterior colporrhaphy may be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with pelvic organ prolapse, predominantly apical prolapse, who had not received a previous surgical correction, and is willing to receive a uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
You may qualify if:
- older than 21 years old.
- uterine prolapse stage 2 at least, defined by C point distal to -1cm by POP-Q system.
- patients willing to receive a uterine-preserving surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, and is suitable for anesthesia after evaluation.
- patients who had or had not received conservative treatments for pelvic organ prolapse.
- patients able and willing to finish the questionnaire evaluation.
You may not qualify if:
- patient who had received a previous hysterectomy, or is planning on concomitant hysterectomy in the surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
- patient who had received a previous surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.
- patient with history of adverse events following a synthetic mesh.
- patients with chronic or acute pelvic pain.
- patients who had received abdominal or pelvic irradiation.
- patients who cannot receive either surgery due to comorbidity.
- patients pregnant or with future plan of pregnancy.
- patients with vaginal length less than 5cm.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cheng Kung University Hospital
Tainan, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Yu Fang Huang
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 16, 2022
First Posted
October 19, 2022
Study Start
July 26, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2029
Last Updated
October 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share