Comparative Study on Surgical Approaches for Elderly Femoral Neck Fractures
A Single Center Prospective Controlled Study of Direct Anterior Approach and Posterior Lateral Approach in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A prospective controlled study was conducted to include patients who received hip replacement surgery for femoral neck fractures at the National Regional Trauma Center in Fujian Province from February 2023 to August 2024. Patients were randomly divided into the DAA group and the PLA group based on different surgical methods for a 3-month follow-up to compare the outcomes of the two groups. The main observation results include Harris hip joint function score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), VAS pain score (preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months), and secondary observation results include surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, difference in HB before and after surgery, difference in CK before and after surgery, perioperative complications, difference in length of both lower limbs after surgery, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ICU occupancy rate, ICU length of stay, and total length of stay.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2025
CompletedJune 11, 2025
June 1, 2025
2.3 years
December 20, 2024
June 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Harris hip joint function score
Scores range from 100 to 0, with 90-100 being excellent, 80-89 being good, 70-79 being acceptable, and ≤69 being poor.
1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
VAS pain score
The highest score is 10 and the lowest score is 0, with the following interpretations: 0 points indicating no pain; 1-3 points indicating mild pain with little impact on daily life; 4-6 points indicating moderate pain affecting daily life and sleep; 7-9 points indicating severe pain significantly affecting quality of life; and 10 points indicating unbearable, extreme pain.
1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Operative time
Intraoperative
Intraoperative bleeding volume
Intraoperative
Intraoperative blood transfusion rate
Intraoperative
Hemoglobin value
Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
Blood creatine kinase value
Preoperative and postoperative 1 day
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
DAA group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing DAA-HA.
PLA group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with femoral neck fractures undergoing PLA-HA.
Interventions
Direct anterior approach hemiarthroplasty
Posterior lateral approach hemiarthroplasty
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 80 years old;
- Diagnosed with unilateral femoral neck fracture through imaging examination;
- Patients who can tolerate surgery and agree to undergo surgery;
- Undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the first time;
- Able to walk independently and have intact cognitive function before the injury.
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral femoral neck fractures;
- Patients with pathological fractures;
- Hip dysplasia, rheumatoid osteoarthritis, or other hip disorders;
- Patients with systemic or localized infections or inflammatory reactions at the surgical site;
- Patients with other lower limb fractures or severe injuries to other parts of the body; Patients with a history of previous hip surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fujian Provincial Hospital Trauma Center
Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001, China
Related Publications (28)
Dahm F, Aichmair A, Dominkus M, Hofstaetter JG. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve lesions after direct anterior approach primary total hip arthroplasty - a literature review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):102956. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102956. Epub 2021 May 4.
PMID: 33962046RESULTZhao G, Zhu R, Jiang S, Xu N, Bao H, Wang Y. Using the anterior capsule of the hip joint to protect the tensor fascia lata muscle during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jan 11;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-3035-9.
PMID: 31926554RESULTUgland TO, Haugeberg G, Svenningsen S, Ugland SH, Berg OH, Pripp AH, Nordsletten L. Biomarkers of muscle damage increased in anterolateral compared to direct lateral approach to the hip in hemiarthroplasty: no correlation with clinical outcome : Short-term analysis of secondary outcomes from a randomized clinical trial in patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2018 Aug;29(8):1853-1860. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4557-y. Epub 2018 May 22.
PMID: 29789919RESULTDimitriou D, Helmy N, Hasler J, Flury A, Finsterwald M, Antoniadis A. The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
PMID: 30262445RESULTOba T, Inaba Y, Saito I, Fujisawa T, Saito T. Risk factors for prolonged operative time in femoral neck fracture patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty through direct anterior approach. J Orthop Sci. 2018 Nov;23(6):977-981. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
PMID: 30087014RESULTTrinh TQ, Ferrel JR, Pulley BR, Fowler TT. Short-term Outcomes of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With Hemiarthroplasty Using the Anterior Approach. Orthopedics. 2015 Dec;38(12):e1091-7. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-05.
PMID: 26652329RESULTDing ZC, Zeng WN, Rong X, Liang ZM, Zhou ZK. Do patients with diabetes have an increased risk of impaired fracture healing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jul;90(7-8):1259-1264. doi: 10.1111/ans.15878. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
PMID: 32255244RESULTJiao H, Xiao E, Graves DT. Diabetes and Its Effect on Bone and Fracture Healing. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2015 Oct;13(5):327-35. doi: 10.1007/s11914-015-0286-8.
PMID: 26254939RESULTJia P, Bao L, Chen H, Yuan J, Liu W, Feng F, Li J, Tang H. Risk of low-energy fracture in type 2 diabetes patients: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Nov;28(11):3113-3121. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4183-0. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
PMID: 28795239RESULTSaxer F, Studer P, Jakob M, Suhm N, Rosenthal R, Dell-Kuster S, Vach W, Bless N. Minimally invasive anterior muscle-sparing versus a transgluteal approach for hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures-a prospective randomised controlled trial including 190 elderly patients. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Sep 21;18(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0898-9.
PMID: 30241509RESULTVerzellotti S, Candrian C, Molina M, Filardo G, Alberio R, Grassi FA. Direct anterior versus posterolateral approach for bipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomised study. Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):810-817. doi: 10.1177/1120700019872117. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
PMID: 31450987RESULTRenken F, Renken S, Paech A, Wenzl M, Unger A, Schulz AP. Early functional results after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Aug 8;13:141. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141.
PMID: 22873207RESULTCarlson VR, Ong AC, Orozco FR, Lutz RW, Duque AF, Post ZD. The Direct Anterior Approach Does Not Increase Return to Function Following Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture. Orthopedics. 2017 Nov 1;40(6):e1055-e1061. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20170925-08. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PMID: 28968478RESULTChung YY, Lee SM, Baek SN, Park TG. Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Elderly with Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison with Conventional Posterolateral Approach. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Mar;14(1):35-40. doi: 10.4055/cios21008. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
PMID: 35251539RESULTBucs G, Dande A, Patczai B, Sebestyen A, Almasi R, Not LG, Wiegand N. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures with minimally invasive anterior approach in elderly. Injury. 2021 Mar;52 Suppl 1:S37-S43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.053. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
PMID: 32115214RESULTKunkel ST, Sabatino MJ, Kang R, Jevsevar DS, Moschetti WE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct anterior approach for hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Feb;28(2):217-232. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2033-6. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
PMID: 28852880RESULTvan der Sijp MPL, van Delft D, Krijnen P, Niggebrugge AHP, Schipper IB. Surgical Approaches and Hemiarthroplasty Outcomes for Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1617-1627.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.029. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
PMID: 29398259RESULTFlorschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, Koval KJ. Femoral neck fractures: current management. J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Mar;29(3):121-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000291.
PMID: 25635363RESULTLeonardsson O, Rolfson O, Rogmark C. The surgical approach for hemiarthroplasty does not influence patient-reported outcome : a national survey of 2118 patients with one-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):542-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36626.
PMID: 27037438RESULTBerggren M, Stenvall M, Englund U, Olofsson B, Gustafson Y. Co-morbidities, complications and causes of death among people with femoral neck fracture - a three-year follow-up study. BMC Geriatr. 2016 Jun 3;16:120. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0291-5.
PMID: 27260196RESULTNeyisci C, Erdem Y, Bilekli AB, Bek D. Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach for Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Geriatric Patients. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jan 21;26:e919993. doi: 10.12659/MSM.919993.
PMID: 31961830RESULTSpina M, Luppi V, Chiappi J, Bagnis F, Balsano M. Direct anterior approach versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty and bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a retrospective comparative study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jun;33(6):1635-1644. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01696-9. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
PMID: 32910422RESULTHuang XT, Liu DG, Jia B, Xu YX. Comparisons between Direct Anterior Approach and Lateral Approach for Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Postoperative Orthopaedic Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthop Surg. 2021 Aug;13(6):1707-1720. doi: 10.1111/os.13101. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
PMID: 34351056RESULTJUDET J, JUDET R. The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1950 May;32-B(2):166-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.32B2.166. No abstract available.
PMID: 15422013RESULTLanglois J, Delambre J, Klouche S, Faivre B, Hardy P. Direct anterior Hueter approach is a safe and effective approach to perform a bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: outcome in 82 patients. Acta Orthop. 2015 Jun;86(3):358-62. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.1002987. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
PMID: 25583401RESULTKannan A, Kancherla R, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Soral A, Malhotra R. Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries. Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1354-z. Epub 2011 Sep 20.
PMID: 21931966RESULTAntapur P, Mahomed N, Gandhi R. Fractures in the elderly: when is hip replacement a necessity? Clin Interv Aging. 2011;6:1-7. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S10204. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
PMID: 21472086RESULTSterling RS. Gender and race/ethnicity differences in hip fracture incidence, morbidity, mortality, and function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jul;469(7):1913-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1736-3.
PMID: 21161737RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2024
First Posted
January 7, 2025
Study Start
February 1, 2023
Primary Completion
May 31, 2025
Study Completion
May 31, 2025
Last Updated
June 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Because of unit regulations.