Virtual Game Simulation in Patient Safety
The Effectiveness of Virtual Game Simulation Method Designed for Patient Safety in Nursing Students
1 other identifier
interventional
132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
With the development of technology, virtual game simulation is starting to take an important place in nursing education, which has spread to the virtual world. There are studies conducted with this application, but there are no virtual game simulation studies related to patient safety. The planned study aims to measure nursing students' tendencies and attitudes towards medical errors, satisfaction and self-confidence in nursing practices with a virtual game simulation related to patient safety developed by the researcher.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 18, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedDecember 27, 2024
December 1, 2024
2 months
December 18, 2024
December 20, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Structured Student Information Form
The structured student information form, developed by the researcher in line with literature knowledge, includes a total of 13 questions on topics such as students' age, gender, etc.
one month
Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool
The measurement tool for students' perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in a simulation environment was designed for self-reporting. The measurement tool has 19 items and four sub-dimensions. It is a 3-point Likert-type scale where the items are scored from 1 to 3. Scored as 1 - "Disagree", 2 - "Partially Agree", 3 - "Strongly Agree". The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the measurement tool is 0.93; the Cronbach Alpha coefficients of its sub-dimensions are 0.83, 0.85, 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. The total score is obtained by summing up all sub-dimension scores.
one month
Simulation Design Scale
The scale consists of 20 items and five subscales: "Goals and Information", "Support", "Problem Solving", "Feedback/Guided Reflection", and "Authenticity". The scale consists of two parts. The first part measures whether the best simulation design elements were applied in the simulation application. This section includes the statements "Strongly Disagree", "Disagree", "Undecided", "Agree", "Strongly Agree", and "Not Appropriate". The second part measures how important the simulation application is for the students. This section includes the statements "Not Important", "Partially Important", "Undecided", "Important", and "Very Important". Cronbach's Alpha values for the subheadings vary between 0.73 and 0.86. The score range is determined as 1 point being the lowest and 5 points being the highest. The scale is scored by dividing the total score given to the answers by the number of items.
one month
Student Satisfaction and Learning Self-Confidence Scale
It consists of two sub-dimensions, "satisfaction with learning" and "self-confidence", and a total of 13 items. The 13th item in the scale is reverse coded. The answer options are 5= Strongly agree, 4= Agree, 3= Undecided: Neither agree nor disagree, 2= Disagree, 1= Strongly disagree. The score is obtained from the sum of the items in the scale. The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 65, the lowest score is 13. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.94.
one month
Medical Error Scale for Nursing Students
The scale was prepared in a 5-point Likert type consisting of 36 items and 7 sub-dimensions, evaluated as always (5), usually (4), sometimes (3), rarely (2), never (1). The total score range of the scale is between 36 and 180. Scores close to 180 on the scale indicate that student nurses are controlled or careful regarding medical errors, while scores close to 36 indicate that student nurses are not controlled regarding medical errors or may make medical errors.
one month
Attitude Scale on Medical Errors
The scale consists of 16 items and 3 sub-dimensions. The aim of the scale is to examine the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards medical errors. It has 3 sub-headings: medical error perception (2 items), medical error approach (7 items), and reasons for medical errors (7 items). The scale is a five-point Likert-type scale. The scores of the answers to the items range from (1) I completely disagree to (5) I completely agree. Questions 10 and 13 under the sub-heading of medical error approach are reverse scored. The cut-off point of the scale is determined as 3. In the scale calculation, the total scale score is obtained by dividing the scale item number. In the sub-dimension calculation, the total score of the sub-dimension is divided by the number of items related to the relevant sub-dimension. The obtained score is between 1 and 5.
one month
Study Arms (2)
Experiment group
EXPERIMENTALGroup to be applied virtual game simulation
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONControl group
Interventions
A virtual computer game that enables participation in a clinical scenario to measure competence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having taken the Fundamentals of Nursing course,
- Being willing and eager to participate in the study,
- Completing the Data Collection Forms completely,
- Not having any communication problems related to vision or hearing,
- Completing all stages of the simulation training process.
You may not qualify if:
- Not having received simulation training regarding patient safety.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences University Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derya AVAN ÇINAR, Study Principal Investigator
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 18, 2024
First Posted
December 24, 2024
Study Start
March 30, 2025
Primary Completion
May 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 27, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share