NCT06747286

Brief Summary

With the development of technology, virtual game simulation is starting to take an important place in nursing education, which has spread to the virtual world. There are studies conducted with this application, but there are no virtual game simulation studies related to patient safety. The planned study aims to measure nursing students' tendencies and attitudes towards medical errors, satisfaction and self-confidence in nursing practices with a virtual game simulation related to patient safety developed by the researcher.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
132

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 18, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 24, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 27, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

December 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 20, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Virtual Game SimulationNursing EducationPatient Safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Structured Student Information Form

    The structured student information form, developed by the researcher in line with literature knowledge, includes a total of 13 questions on topics such as students' age, gender, etc.

    one month

  • Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool

    The measurement tool for students' perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in a simulation environment was designed for self-reporting. The measurement tool has 19 items and four sub-dimensions. It is a 3-point Likert-type scale where the items are scored from 1 to 3. Scored as 1 - "Disagree", 2 - "Partially Agree", 3 - "Strongly Agree". The Cronbach Alpha internal consistency coefficient of the measurement tool is 0.93; the Cronbach Alpha coefficients of its sub-dimensions are 0.83, 0.85, 0.91 and 0.90, respectively. The total score is obtained by summing up all sub-dimension scores.

    one month

  • Simulation Design Scale

    The scale consists of 20 items and five subscales: "Goals and Information", "Support", "Problem Solving", "Feedback/Guided Reflection", and "Authenticity". The scale consists of two parts. The first part measures whether the best simulation design elements were applied in the simulation application. This section includes the statements "Strongly Disagree", "Disagree", "Undecided", "Agree", "Strongly Agree", and "Not Appropriate". The second part measures how important the simulation application is for the students. This section includes the statements "Not Important", "Partially Important", "Undecided", "Important", and "Very Important". Cronbach's Alpha values for the subheadings vary between 0.73 and 0.86. The score range is determined as 1 point being the lowest and 5 points being the highest. The scale is scored by dividing the total score given to the answers by the number of items.

    one month

  • Student Satisfaction and Learning Self-Confidence Scale

    It consists of two sub-dimensions, "satisfaction with learning" and "self-confidence", and a total of 13 items. The 13th item in the scale is reverse coded. The answer options are 5= Strongly agree, 4= Agree, 3= Undecided: Neither agree nor disagree, 2= Disagree, 1= Strongly disagree. The score is obtained from the sum of the items in the scale. The highest score that can be obtained from the scale is 65, the lowest score is 13. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to be 0.94.

    one month

  • Medical Error Scale for Nursing Students

    The scale was prepared in a 5-point Likert type consisting of 36 items and 7 sub-dimensions, evaluated as always (5), usually (4), sometimes (3), rarely (2), never (1). The total score range of the scale is between 36 and 180. Scores close to 180 on the scale indicate that student nurses are controlled or careful regarding medical errors, while scores close to 36 indicate that student nurses are not controlled regarding medical errors or may make medical errors.

    one month

  • Attitude Scale on Medical Errors

    The scale consists of 16 items and 3 sub-dimensions. The aim of the scale is to examine the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards medical errors. It has 3 sub-headings: medical error perception (2 items), medical error approach (7 items), and reasons for medical errors (7 items). The scale is a five-point Likert-type scale. The scores of the answers to the items range from (1) I completely disagree to (5) I completely agree. Questions 10 and 13 under the sub-heading of medical error approach are reverse scored. The cut-off point of the scale is determined as 3. In the scale calculation, the total scale score is obtained by dividing the scale item number. In the sub-dimension calculation, the total score of the sub-dimension is divided by the number of items related to the relevant sub-dimension. The obtained score is between 1 and 5.

    one month

Study Arms (2)

Experiment group

EXPERIMENTAL

Group to be applied virtual game simulation

Other: Virtual Game Simulation

Control group

NO INTERVENTION

Control group

Interventions

A virtual computer game that enables participation in a clinical scenario to measure competence.

Also known as: experimental
Experiment group

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Having taken the Fundamentals of Nursing course,
  • Being willing and eager to participate in the study,
  • Completing the Data Collection Forms completely,
  • Not having any communication problems related to vision or hearing,
  • Completing all stages of the simulation training process.

You may not qualify if:

  • Not having received simulation training regarding patient safety.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Health Sciences University Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Study Officials

  • Derya AVAN ÇINAR, Study Principal Investigator

    Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Semra Açıksöz, assist prof

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two groups with an experiment control group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Student

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2024

First Posted

December 24, 2024

Study Start

March 30, 2025

Primary Completion

May 30, 2025

Study Completion

June 30, 2025

Last Updated

December 27, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations