NCT06723028

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to test if a regulation of craving training intervention in the form of a mobile phone app can increase fruit and vegetable intake in adolescent girls ages 14-18 years of age. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.What is the effect of a mobile app version of the regulation of craving training intervention on healthy eating index scores over one year?
  2. 2.What is the effect of a mobile app version of the regulation of craving training intervention on body mass index, waist circumference, and blood glucose over one year? Researchers will compare the active regulation of craving training arm to a control fun food fact arm to see if the regulation of craving training improves HEI scores, BMI, and blood glucose over a year. Participants will be asked to play the regulation of craving training mobile app twice a week for a year.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Feb 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress72%
Feb 2025Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 3, 2024

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 9, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2026

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 3, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

mobile appcognitive behavioral therapyfruit and vegetable intaketype 2 diabetes preventionruraladolescents

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Healthy eating index (HEI)

    Participants will provide diet recalls twice per month. The participants will complete the diet recalls using the Automated Self Administered 24 hour recall (ASA-24) platform. The ASA-24 computes the necessary variables to calculate the healthy eating index (HEI). HEI is a measure of overall diet quality according to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and is scored from 0-100 (100 being the best possible diet). HEI scores will be calculated per month (mean of diet recalls per person) using the most recent HEI scoring algorithm as recommended for intervention studies.

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Body mass index

    1 year

  • Blood sugar

    1 year

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Blood sugar dynamics

    1 year

  • Insulin sensitivity

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

Positive regulation of craving training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized into the active mROC-T intervention (mROC-T+) will: 1. Read a brief essay about the social justice benefits of eating healthy foods 2. Participants complete six free-response questions to ensure that they understood the essays. 3. Participants are instructed to use the information from the essay. They are shown a cue matching the essay: "Think Positive" 4. They are shown an image of a healthy food (no added sugar and \< 2g/serving saturated fat) OR an image of an unhealthy food (contain added sugar and/or \>4.5g/serving saturated fat). 5. The participant is asked to rate how strong their craving is for the pictured food. The participant indicates their craving on a VAS from 1 (No craving at all) to 5 (Very high craving)

Behavioral: Regulation of craving training

Critical regulation of craving training

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized into the active mROC-T intervention (mROC-Tc) will: 1. Read a brief essay about the social justice consequences of eating unhealthy foods (CIRITCAL, mROCTc) 2. Participants complete six free-response questions to ensure that they understood the essays. 3. Participants are instructed to use the information from the essay. They are shown a cue matching the essay: "Think Critical" 4. They are shown an image of a healthy food (no added sugar and \< 2g/serving saturated fat) OR an image of an unhealthy food (contain added sugar and/or \>4.5g/serving saturated fat). 5. The participant is asked to rate how strong their craving is for the pictured food. The participant indicates their craving on a VAS from 1 (No craving at all) to 5 (Very high craving)

Behavioral: Regulation of craving training

Control

SHAM COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to the control (CRO) group will: 1. Read a brief essay about fun food trivia (unrelated to any aspects of perceived healthiness). The essays are matched on structure/word count to the mROC-T essays. 2. Participants complete six free-response questions to ensure that they understood the essays. 3. Participants are instructed to use the information from the essay. They are shown a cue matching the essay, either: "Think Relaxed" or "Think Serene". 4. They are shown an image of a healthy food (no added sugar and \< 2g/serving saturated fat) OR an image of an unhealthy food (contain added sugar and/or \>4.5g/serving saturated fat). 5. The participant is asked to rate how strong their craving is for the pictured food. The participant indicates their craving on a VAS from 1 (No craving at all) to 5 (Very high craving)

Behavioral: Regulation of craving training

Interventions

Participants randomized into the active mROC-T intervention (mROC-T+ or mROC-Tc) will: 1. Read a brief essay about either the social justice benefits of eating healthy foods (POSITIVE, mROCT+) or critical of social justice aspects of unhealthy foods (CRITICAL, mROC-Tc). 2. Participants complete six free-response questions to ensure that they understood the essays. 3\. Participants are instructed to use the information from the essay. They are shown a cue matching the essay they read either: "Think Positive" or "Think Critically". 4\. They are shown an image of a healthy food (no added sugar and \< 2g/serving saturated fat) OR an image of an unhealthy food (contain added sugar and/or \>4.5g/serving saturated fat). 5. Finally, the participant is asked to rate how strong their craving is for the pictured food. The participant indicates their craving on a VAS from 1 (No craving at all) to 5 (Very high craving)

ControlCritical regulation of craving trainingPositive regulation of craving training

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 18 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsCurrently we are studying participants who are biologically female and who consider themselves female.
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Biologically female
  • Female gender
  • Between the ages of 15y and 18y

You may not qualify if:

  • Biologically male
  • Self-identify as male
  • BMI percentile (for age and sex) \< 5th%
  • Diagnosis from a medical profession of any of the following conditions, syndromes, diseases that may affect growth, glucose metabolism, blood clotting, cognitive development\*:
  • Any form of or history of cancer
  • Any form of diabetes (type I, II, insipidus)
  • Precocious puberty
  • Crohn's disease
  • Congenital heart defect
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Cerebral palsy
  • Anorexia nervosa
  • Bulimia nervosa
  • Active infection
  • Fever
  • +46 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Wyoming

Laramie, Wyoming, 80270, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Jensen CD, Duraccio KM, Barnett KA, Stevens KS. Appropriateness of the food-pics image database for experimental eating and appetite research with adolescents. Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

    PMID: 27842263BACKGROUND
  • Boswell RG, Kober H. Food cue reactivity and craving predict eating and weight gain: a meta-analytic review. Obes Rev. 2016 Feb;17(2):159-77. doi: 10.1111/obr.12354. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

    PMID: 26644270BACKGROUND
  • Miri SF, Javadi M, Lin CY, Griffiths MD, Bjork M, Pakpour AH. Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy on nutrition improvement and weight of overweight and obese adolescents: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019 May-Jun;13(3):2190-2197. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 22.

    PMID: 31235156BACKGROUND
  • Boswell RG, Sun W, Suzuki S, Kober H. Training in cognitive strategies reduces eating and improves food choice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):E11238-E11247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717092115. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

    PMID: 30420496BACKGROUND
  • Bryan CJ, Yeager DS, Hinojosa CP, Chabot A, Bergen H, Kawamura M, Steubing F. Harnessing adolescent values to motivate healthier eating. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Sep 27;113(39):10830-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604586113. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

    PMID: 27621440BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDiabetes MellitusGlucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Grace Shearrer, PhD

    University of Wyoming

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2024

First Posted

December 9, 2024

Study Start

February 1, 2025

Primary Completion

February 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

May 5, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

We will share our data 6-months after the publication of our main effects paper. Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA). Requests can be made to Dr. Shearrer.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
We will share our data 6-months after the publication of our main effects paper for up to 24 months
Access Criteria
Data that will be shared: All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after de-identification. Other documents that will be available: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form, Clinical Study Report, Analytic Code Timeframe: Beginning 6 months and ending 24 months following article publication Who is able to access the data: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal with delineation of publication expectations and authorship outlined. Types of analysis: To achieve aims in the approved proposal. Mechanism data will be made available: Proposals should be directed to Dr. Shearrer. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement and submit a proposal.

Locations