NCT03923491

Brief Summary

U.S. children eat too little fruits and vegetables and whole grains, and too many energy dense foods, dietary behaviors associated with increased morbidity from cardiovascular diseases. Parents play a key role in shaping their child's diet and best practices suggest that parents should involve children in food preparation, offer, model and encourage a variety of healthy foods. In addition, while parents help to shape food preferences, not all children respond in the same way and certain appetitive traits, such as satiety responsiveness (sensitivity to internal satiety signals), food responsiveness (sensitivity to external food cues), and enjoyment of food may help explain some of these differences. Prior interventions among preschool aged children to improve their diet have not used a holistic approach that fully targets the home food environment, by focusing on food quality, food preparation, and positive feeding practices while acknowledging a child's appetitive traits. This proposal will build upon pre-pilot work to develop and pilot-test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a novel home-based intervention. The proposed 6-month intervention, will include 3 monthly home visits by a community health worker (CHW) trained in motivational interviewing, that include in-home cooking demos. In between visits, parents will receive tailored text-messages 2x/wk. and monthly mailed tailored materials. During the last 3 months CHW phone calls will replace the home visits. The intervention will be tailored for individual families based on the child's appetitive traits. The proposed research will lay the groundwork for a larger trial to support, motivate, and empower low-income parents to prepare healthy meals and use healthy feeding practices, which will improve children's diets and ultimately their health.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
63

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2018

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 22, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2019

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 12, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 12, 2021

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

December 18, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

December 18, 2023

Status Verified

December 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2018

Results QC Date

September 27, 2022

Last Update Submit

December 15, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • HEI-2015 Total and Component Scores

    HEI-2015 scores will be calculated from twenty four hour recall data (two of them which are combined and scored per 1000 kcal or as a % of intake per NCI scoring guidelines). HEI was designed to measure diet quality in terms of how well diets conform to the 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. The total HEI score represents the sum of 12 components scores (minimum component can be 0 and maximum component score shown in parentheses for each), including total fruit (5), whole fruit (5), total vegetables (5), green and beans (includes dark green vegetables and cooked, dried beans and peas because intakes of these types of vegetables are furthest from the amounts recommended in the USDA Food Patterns) (5), whole grain (10), dairy (10), total protein food (5), seafood and plant proteins (5), fatty acids (10), refined grains (10), sodium (10) added sugar (10), saturated fat (10). Higher scores reflect better outcomes.

    Healthy Eating Index Scores at study completion (6 months)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Food Parenting Practices

    Food Parenting Practices at study completion (6 months)

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Home Food Availability Change

    Changes in Home Food Inventory Scores between baseline and study completion at 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Healthy Feeding, Healthy Eating

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental arm will receive three home over the first three months of the intervention.Visits will be conducted by a community health worker (CHW) trained in Motivational Interviewing. The home visits will include video-feedback on a meal; in-home cooking demonstrations; tailored text-messages, and mailed materials. During the last three months of the intervention, CHW will conduct monthly phone calls, together with mailed materials and text messages. The intervention will be tailored for families based on the child's appetitive traits and eating behaviors.

Behavioral: Healthy Feeding, Healthy Eating

Reading and Readiness

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The Reading and Readiness group will receive information on school readiness promotion. Materials will be adapted and delivered by the community health worker (CHW) with a similar dose and schedule as the intervention group (three home visits and three phone calls). During the home visits, the CHW will show a video that models early childhood caregiver-child activities and demonstrates simple methods to interact with their children. They will also send a video of themselves reading with a child, receive text-messages based on these materials as well as the print materials during the last three months of the intervention.

Behavioral: Reading Readiness

Interventions

Home Based Motivational Interviewing to Improve Diet Quality of Preschoolers

Healthy Feeding, Healthy Eating

Active Control that uses Motivational Interviewing to improve Reading Readiness of Preschool Children

Reading and Readiness

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Speak English or Spanish
  • Have a child between 2- 5 years of age
  • Live with their child most of the time
  • Have a phone that is able to video-record
  • Be willing to have evening meals video recorded in the home

You may not qualify if:

  • \*Has a diagnosed feeding disorder, dietary restrictions, or medical condition that impacts how they feed their child.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Rhode Island

Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, United States

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Fox K, Gans K, McCurdy K, Risica PM, Jennings E, Gorin A, Papandonatos GD, Tovar A. Rationale, design and study protocol of the 'Strong Families Start at Home' feasibility trial to improve the diet quality of low-income, ethnically diverse children by helping parents improve their feeding and food preparation practices. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jun 16;19:100583. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100583. eCollection 2020 Sep.

    PMID: 32637721BACKGROUND
  • McCurdy K, Gans KM, Risica PM, Fox K, Tovar A. Food insecurity, food parenting practices, and child eating behaviors among low-income Hispanic families of young children. Appetite. 2022 Feb 1;169:105857. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105857. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

    PMID: 34896386BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Diet, Healthy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological Phenomena

Limitations and Caveats

In consideration of our study findings, there are some limitations worth noting. First, given the COVID-19 pandemic, several modifications had to be made to the intervention and data collection procedures. We were not able to test our initial fully home-based model and had to modify our secondary outcome of observing changes in the home food environment.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Alison Tovar
Organization
Brown University School of Public Health

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Intervention vs. Attention Control
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2018

First Posted

April 22, 2019

Study Start

July 24, 2019

Primary Completion

April 12, 2021

Study Completion

April 12, 2021

Last Updated

December 18, 2023

Results First Posted

December 18, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Locations