NCT06656117

Brief Summary

COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF ELLIPTICAL TRAINING VS RESISTANCE TRAINING ON CARDIOPULMONARY PARAMETERS IN POST CABG PATIENTS

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2024

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 23, 2024

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2024

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

October 23, 2024

Last Update Submit

October 24, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

CABGElliptical trainingResistance training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • modified borg dyspnea scale

    The modified Borg dyspnea score is a version of the CR10; 45 it uses a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no dyspnea and 10 represents maximal dyspnea. Scores are obtained at the end of the 6MWD test and reflect the maximum degree of dyspnea at any time during the walk test .

    4 weeks

  • Health related quality of life(SF12)

    The SF-12 Health version 2 is a generic short form health survey developed in the USA from the original SF-36. It produces two summary measures evaluating physical and mental self-perceived health; for this reason, it could be a suitable and complete tool to assess the self-perceived quality of life of university students because it allows investigating both the aspects .

    4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Elliptical training

EXPERIMENTAL

* Patients in group A started with a five-minute warm-up, which included cycling on a Star Trac bike and dynamic stretching. * Following the warm-up, participants were instructed to perform Elliptical training after completing breathing exercises. * At the end of the training session, participants from both groups engaged in a five-minute gradual cool down.

Other: Elliptical training

Resistance training

EXPERIMENTAL

* Patients in group B started with a five-minute warm-up, which included cycling on a Star Trac bike and dynamic stretching. * Following the warm-up, participants were instructed to perform Resistance training after completing breathing exercises. * At the end of the training session, participants from both groups engaged in a five-minute gradual cool down.

Other: Resistance training

Interventions

• Throughout the training, participants' heart rates were monitored, and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual signs.

Elliptical training

• Throughout the training, participants' heart rates were monitored, and they were asked to report any discomfort or unusual signs.

Resistance training

Eligibility Criteria

Age45 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Both male and female age 45-55 years.
  • Post Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) patients at phase III cardiac rehabilitation were included .
  • Patients who had physically active lower limbs were included .

You may not qualify if:

  • Participants who had psychological conditions that may influence understanding or answering of questionnaire.
  • Patients with other cardiac lesions combined with simultaneous surgical management, such as valvular lesions, macro vascular lesions, and ventricular wall tumors.
  • Patients diagnosed with emergency CABG, minimally invasive CABG, or recurrent cardiac surgery.
  • Patients with severe dysfunction of important organs such as the lung, liver, and kidney.
  • Patients with recent major surgery or trauma of other parts of body.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sehat medical complex

Sialkot, Punjab Province, 51310, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Resistance Training

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Conditioning, HumanExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Sumera Hameed, M.PHIL

    Riphah International University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The study was single blinded,as accessor of the study were kept blind to the intervention group
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this parallel-group randmoized control trial (RCT),post Cabag patients will br assigned to either elliptical training group or to resistance training group .This study aims to evualate the comparative effects of eliptical training vs resistance training on cardiopulmonary parameters
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2024

First Posted

October 24, 2024

Study Start

April 15, 2024

Primary Completion

December 15, 2024

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

October 28, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations