NCT06581926

Brief Summary

This project was planned to examine whether there is a difference between nutrition knowledge level, reward-related eating behaviour and body awareness in healthy young adults according to gender.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
512

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 30, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

December 3, 2024

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

August 29, 2024

Last Update Submit

December 2, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

HealthyPeopleGenderNutritionBody awareness

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • nutrition knowledge

    Nutritional knowledge level for adults: A 5-point Likert-type scale with a total of 32 propositions was formed. The scores obtained from the evaluation criteria of the nutritional knowledge level scale for adults are evaluated as poor, moderate, good and very good. Participants with a basic nutrition score of less than 45 are considered to have a poor level of knowledge, those with a score between 45 and 55 have a moderate level of knowledge, those with a score between 56 and 65 have a good level of knowledge, and those with a score above 65 have a very good level of knowledge. Participants with a food preference score of less than 30 are considered to have poor knowledge, those with a score of 30-36 are considered to have moderate knowledge, those with a score of 37-42 are considered to have good knowledge, and those with a score of more than 42 are considered to have very good knowledge.

    Baseline

  • reward-related eating

    Reward-Related Eating Scale (RED-13): It is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of 13 items in 2017. This scale has three sub-dimensions that assess lack of satiety, preoccupation with food and lack of control over eating. A maximum score of 65 and a minimum score of 13 can be obtained from the Red-13 scale. Higher scores on the Red-13 are associated with greater appetite and craving for sweets.

    Baseline

  • body awareness

    Body Awareness Questionarre (BAQ): It is basically a questionnaire that questions body reactions, the individual\'s estimates of body processes, the disease process and the sleep-wake cycle. It is a Likert-type questionnaire consisting of 18 items and 4 subgroups. A high score from the questionnaire means a high level of body awareness.

    Baseline

  • descriptive assessment

    In the general information form of the young individuals participating in the study, demographic information (gender, age, height, body weight, body mass index, etc.) was included.

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Female

Healthy young women aged 18-30 years

Other: Behavioral assessment

Male

Healthy young men aged 18-30 years

Other: Behavioral assessment

Interventions

nutrition knowledge reward-related eating body awareness

FemaleMale

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Healthy young individuals

You may qualify if:

  • years old

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18 years old
  • not volunteering

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

Niğde, Bor, 51200, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coitus

Interventions

Neuropsychological Tests

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Psychological TestsBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Elif Gökçe İnbaşı, MSc.

    Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2024

First Posted

September 3, 2024

Study Start

May 30, 2024

Primary Completion

October 30, 2024

Study Completion

November 30, 2024

Last Updated

December 3, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The study data will not be shared with third parties. The informed consent form has been prepared and approved in this way.

Locations