NCT06550856

Brief Summary

The present study will be conducted to assess whether there is a direct benefit associated with modified-Graham's omentopexy (MGO), above and beyond the benefit associated with Graham's omentopexy (GO) in the treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. We attempted to answer the question whether primary closure of the perforation in MGO will affect the outcome of surgery. Complication rates will be compared for the two alternative surgical procedures.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 15, 2024

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

August 8, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Early postoperative follow up for repair of perforated peptic ulcer

    resumption of oral intake

    Three days after the operation

Study Arms (2)

SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (A ) includes modification of the Graham's patch will be used in this group, where suitable sutures are passed between the edges of perforation and tied to close the perforation. A pedicle of omentum based on right omental artery is brought between these sutures, and these sutures are tied again with pedicle of omentum between knots over the perforation (thus the omentum remains sandwiched between the two levels of secured knots).

Procedure: SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (B) includes Grahm's technique of omentopexy will be performed by closing the perforation by placing interrupted full thickness suitable sutures along the margins of the ulcer with a patch of pedicled omentum laid over these sutures, which are then tied (without any attempt for primary closure of the perforation before placing the omentum as a plug).

Procedure: OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Interventions

Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired using full thickness suture closure using 3/0 vicryl suture then omental patch laied over the sutures.

SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Patients presented with perforated peptic ulcer will be repaired by using omental patch without any attempt for primary closure of perforation.

OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \- All adult patients of both sexes with a clinical diagnosis of perforated peptic ulcer (gastric or duodenal) that are fit to undergo surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • \- 1. Patients with associated bleeding ulcer (additional steps are needed to control bleeding).
  • \. Patients with associated pathology other than perforated peptic ulcer that needs surgical intervention.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Sohag university Hospital

Sohag, Egypt

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Berne TV, Donovan AJ. Nonoperative treatment of perforated duodenal ulcer. Arch Surg. 1989 Jul;124(7):830-2. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1989.01410070084017.

    PMID: 2742484BACKGROUND
  • Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT. Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg. 1987 Jan;205(1):22-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198701000-00005.

    PMID: 3800459BACKGROUND
  • Chung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1.

    PMID: 28138363BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peptic UlcerDuodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesStomach Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Adel A Abdrabou, Resident

CONTACT

Asem Elsani M Ali, Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident in the Department of General Surgery, oncological and Laparoscopic Surgery Sohag University Hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2024

First Posted

August 13, 2024

Study Start

July 15, 2024

Primary Completion

May 1, 2025

Study Completion

May 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 13, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Locations