Perforated Peptic Ulcer
8
2
2
4
Key Insights
Highlights
Success Rate
100% trial completion (above average)
Clinical Risk Assessment
Based on trial outcomes
Moderate Risk
Score: 50/100
0.0%
0 terminated out of 8 trials
100.0%
+13.5% vs benchmark
0%
0 trials in Phase 3/4
0%
0 of 4 completed with results
Key Signals
Data Visualizations
Phase Distribution
Trial Status
Trial Success Rate
Benchmark: 86.5%
Based on 4 completed trials
Clinical Trials (8)
Open vs Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Short Term Outcome Following Post Operative Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Patients With Perforated Peptic Ulcer
SUTURE-CLOSURE OMENTOPEXY VERSUS OMENTOPEXY ALONE IN REPAIR OF PERFORATED PEPTIC ULCER
Management of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Falciformopexy for Treatment Perforated Peptic Ulcer.
Impact of Abdominal Drains on the ERAS Pathway in Peptic Perforation
The LAMA Trial: Laparoscopic Correction of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Versus Open Correction