Open vs Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
Comparison Between Open vs Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
comparison between outcomes of both open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 24, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2024
CompletedJuly 8, 2025
July 1, 2025
1 year
December 24, 2022
July 4, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; operative time
comparison of operative time of both laparoscopic and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer
baseline
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; repair site leakage
comparison of repair site leakage between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up through drains inspection.
baseline
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; intra-abdominal abscess
comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up through abdominal ultrasonography.
baseline
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; surgical site infection
comparison of surgical site infection between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer through daily dressing and wound inspection for signs of inflammation.
baseline
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; postoperative ileus
comparison of postoperative ileus between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up of bowel movements.
baseline
short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; hospital stay
comparison of duration of patient's hospital stay between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer.
baseline
Study Arms (2)
open approach for perforated pectic ulcer
ACTIVE COMPARATORrepair of perforated peptic ulcer by open technique (exploration)
lap. approach for perforated peptic ulcer
ACTIVE COMPARATORrepair of perforated peptic ulcer by laparoscopy
Interventions
repair of defect of perforated peptic ulcer and peritoneal decontamination by exploration
repair of defect of perforated peptic ulcer and peritoneal decontamination by laparoscopy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients older than 16 years old and younger than 70 years old.
- Patients presenting with acute abdomen due to perforated peptic ulcer
- Patients eligible for laparoscopic surgeries
You may not qualify if:
- Patients younger than 16 years old and older than 70 years old
- Contraindications to laparoscopic surgeries as (Hemodynamic instability/shock, Acute intestinal obstruction with dilated bowel loops, Increased intracranial pressure, Relative contraindications, Cardiac failure, Pulmonary failure, Pregnancy/large pelvic masses, Soft tissue infection at port sites, Expected (extensive) adhesions from a previous abdominal surgery)
- Patients who absconded or left the study or died during the period of study.
- Patients with a surgical diagnosis other than perforated peptic ulcer
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut University Hospital
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
Related Publications (11)
Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
PMID: 20033725BACKGROUNDChung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1.
PMID: 28138363BACKGROUNDWang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b975b8.
PMID: 20009753BACKGROUNDSoreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Moller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, Soreide JA. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1288-1298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7.
PMID: 26460663BACKGROUNDMoller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, Moller AM; Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) trial group. Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):802-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7429. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
PMID: 21442610BACKGROUNDSvanes C, Lie RT, Svanes K, Lie SA, Soreide O. Adverse effects of delayed treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1994 Aug;220(2):168-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199408000-00008.
PMID: 8053739BACKGROUNDMouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1990 Sep;77(9):1006. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916. No abstract available.
PMID: 2145052BACKGROUNDArnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Regenet N. Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Jun;12(3):145-7. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200206000-00001.
PMID: 12080252BACKGROUNDLau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y. Epub 2004 May 12.
PMID: 15136924BACKGROUNDBertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI, Smulders JF, Steyerberg EW, Lange JF. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1368-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y.
PMID: 19430829BACKGROUNDDi Saverio S, Bassi M, Smerieri N, Masetti M, Ferrara F, Fabbri C, Ansaloni L, Ghersi S, Serenari M, Coccolini F, Naidoo N, Sartelli M, Tugnoli G, Catena F, Cennamo V, Jovine E. Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug 3;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-45. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.
PMID: 25114715BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mahmoud Mohamed, Mch
Assiut university hospitals
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mostafa Sayed, Mch
Assiut university hospitals
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ibrahim Mostafa, Mch
Assiut university hospitals
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 24, 2022
First Posted
March 14, 2023
Study Start
September 15, 2023
Primary Completion
September 15, 2024
Study Completion
September 15, 2024
Last Updated
July 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07