NCT05767320

Brief Summary

comparison between outcomes of both open and laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 24, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 14, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 15, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

December 24, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 4, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; operative time

    comparison of operative time of both laparoscopic and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer

    baseline

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; repair site leakage

    comparison of repair site leakage between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up through drains inspection.

    baseline

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; intra-abdominal abscess

    comparison of intra-abdominal abscess formation between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up through abdominal ultrasonography.

    baseline

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; surgical site infection

    comparison of surgical site infection between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer through daily dressing and wound inspection for signs of inflammation.

    baseline

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; postoperative ileus

    comparison of postoperative ileus between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer by follow up of bowel movements.

    baseline

  • short term outcomes of both open and lap. Repair of perforated peptic ulcer; hospital stay

    comparison of duration of patient's hospital stay between both lap. and open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

    baseline

Study Arms (2)

open approach for perforated pectic ulcer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

repair of perforated peptic ulcer by open technique (exploration)

Procedure: open repair(exploration)

lap. approach for perforated peptic ulcer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

repair of perforated peptic ulcer by laparoscopy

Procedure: abdominal laparoscopy

Interventions

repair of defect of perforated peptic ulcer and peritoneal decontamination by exploration

open approach for perforated pectic ulcer

repair of defect of perforated peptic ulcer and peritoneal decontamination by laparoscopy

lap. approach for perforated peptic ulcer

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years - 69 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients older than 16 years old and younger than 70 years old.
  • Patients presenting with acute abdomen due to perforated peptic ulcer
  • Patients eligible for laparoscopic surgeries

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients younger than 16 years old and older than 70 years old
  • Contraindications to laparoscopic surgeries as (Hemodynamic instability/shock, Acute intestinal obstruction with dilated bowel loops, Increased intracranial pressure, Relative contraindications, Cardiac failure, Pulmonary failure, Pregnancy/large pelvic masses, Soft tissue infection at port sites, Expected (extensive) adhesions from a previous abdominal surgery)
  • Patients who absconded or left the study or died during the period of study.
  • Patients with a surgical diagnosis other than perforated peptic ulcer

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Assiut University Hospital

Asyut, 71515, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Bertleff MJ, Lange JF. Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature. Surg Endosc. 2010 Jun;24(6):1231-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0765-z. Epub 2009 Dec 24.

    PMID: 20033725BACKGROUND
  • Chung KT, Shelat VG. Perforated peptic ulcer - an update. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Jan 27;9(1):1-12. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v9.i1.1.

    PMID: 28138363BACKGROUND
  • Wang YR, Richter JE, Dempsey DT. Trends and outcomes of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006. Ann Surg. 2010 Jan;251(1):51-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b975b8.

    PMID: 20009753BACKGROUND
  • Soreide K, Thorsen K, Harrison EM, Bingener J, Moller MH, Ohene-Yeboah M, Soreide JA. Perforated peptic ulcer. Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1288-1298. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00276-7.

    PMID: 26460663BACKGROUND
  • Moller MH, Adamsen S, Thomsen RW, Moller AM; Peptic Ulcer Perforation (PULP) trial group. Multicentre trial of a perioperative protocol to reduce mortality in patients with peptic ulcer perforation. Br J Surg. 2011 Jun;98(6):802-10. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7429. Epub 2011 Mar 25.

    PMID: 21442610BACKGROUND
  • Svanes C, Lie RT, Svanes K, Lie SA, Soreide O. Adverse effects of delayed treatment for perforated peptic ulcer. Ann Surg. 1994 Aug;220(2):168-75. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199408000-00008.

    PMID: 8053739BACKGROUND
  • Mouret P, Francois Y, Vignal J, Barth X, Lombard-Platet R. Laparoscopic treatment of perforated peptic ulcer. Br J Surg. 1990 Sep;77(9):1006. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800770916. No abstract available.

    PMID: 2145052BACKGROUND
  • Arnaud JP, Tuech JJ, Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Regenet N. Laparoscopic suture closure of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2002 Jun;12(3):145-7. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200206000-00001.

    PMID: 12080252BACKGROUND
  • Lau H. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8266-y. Epub 2004 May 12.

    PMID: 15136924BACKGROUND
  • Bertleff MJ, Halm JA, Bemelman WA, van der Ham AC, van der Harst E, Oei HI, Smulders JF, Steyerberg EW, Lange JF. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial. World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1368-73. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0054-y.

    PMID: 19430829BACKGROUND
  • Di Saverio S, Bassi M, Smerieri N, Masetti M, Ferrara F, Fabbri C, Ansaloni L, Ghersi S, Serenari M, Coccolini F, Naidoo N, Sartelli M, Tugnoli G, Catena F, Cennamo V, Jovine E. Diagnosis and treatment of perforated or bleeding peptic ulcers: 2013 WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2014 Aug 3;9:45. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-45. eCollection 2014. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25114715BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peptic UlcerDuodenal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesStomach Diseases

Study Officials

  • Mahmoud Mohamed, Mch

    Assiut university hospitals

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Mostafa Sayed, Mch

    Assiut university hospitals

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Ibrahim Mostafa, Mch

    Assiut university hospitals

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: patients presenting with perforated peptic ulcer are divided into two groups ,one group undergoes open exploration and the other group undergoes laparoscopy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2022

First Posted

March 14, 2023

Study Start

September 15, 2023

Primary Completion

September 15, 2024

Study Completion

September 15, 2024

Last Updated

July 8, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations