Calibr-Ì: Comparative Evaluation of Phantomless Calibration Methods to Quantify Bone Mineral Density for Opportunistic Analysis of CT Scans
Calibr-Ì
Comparative Evaluation of Phantomless Calibration Methods to Quantify Bone Mineral Density for Opportunistic Analysis of CT Scans
1 other identifier
observational
100
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) and qualitative alteration of the skeleton, resulting in increased bone fragility and fracture risk. The epidemiological impact of osteoporosis is extremely high. Proper diagnosis and clinical management of osteoporosis are critical to reducing the incidence of fragility fractures and preventing their complications. The diagnosis is generally confirmed by instrumental analysis of bone mineral density. The standard method is X-ray bone densitometry (DXA), which allows diagnosis based on criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) by virtue of the T-score. DXA is a relatively quick and inexpensive examination with low exposure to ionizing radiation. However, this method has limitations in detecting fracture risk, and in addition, not all patients are properly referred for DXA services, which, among other things, require specific criteria to be reimbursed by the National Health System. Currently, computed tomography (CT) scanning is the most widely used three-dimensional diagnostic modality in clinical practice, and the number of investigations performed in high-income countries is continuously growing. Quantitative assessment of bone mineral density by CT is possible by proper calibration of the machine for the purpose of converting the CT numbers (or Hounsfield units) measured by the scanner into BMD units.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2024
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 6, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 6, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
CompletedJune 10, 2025
June 1, 2025
2 years
June 6, 2024
June 9, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of different internal calibration methods
Compare the different methods of internal or phantomless calibration described in the literature with synchronous and asynchronous calibration in a population of patients undergoing CT scans that include the lumbar spine to assess their feasibility.
At baseline (Day 0)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Definition of performance of internal calibration methods
At baseline (Day 0)
Optimization of existing internal calibration methods
Through study completion, up to 2 years
Study Arms (1)
Experimental
Patients that require a TC scan.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
The study will involve a population of patients undergoing CT scans including the lumbar spine at the Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Unit of each participating center. In CT scans requiring the administration of contrast medium, only the non-contrast-enhanced images will be considered.
You may qualify if:
- Both sexes.
- All ethnicities.
- Age equal or above 18 years.
- Any clinical indication (no specific pathology is required) for a CT scan of the lumbosacral spine or abdomen in which the entire lumbar spine (L1 to L5), paravertebral muscles, abdominal aorta, and subcutaneous adipose tissue are visible.
- Ability to give informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- General contraindications to CT examination, including pregnancy or body weight/size exceeding scanner limits.
- Severe degenerative manifestations of the lumbosacral spine.
- Severe scoliosis of the lumbosacral spine.
- Surgical hardware that prevents adequate CT scanning.
- Oncologic pathology in progress or in recent history.
- Any other situation deemed incompatible with the study by the designated physician or investigator.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
The Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute
Bologna, Bo, 40136, Italy
Auckland Hospital - Greenlane Clinical Centre - National Women's Hospital
Auckland, New Zealand
Related Publications (4)
Rossini M, Adami S, Bertoldo F, Diacinti D, Gatti D, Giannini S, Giusti A, Malavolta N, Minisola S, Osella G, Pedrazzoni M, Sinigaglia L, Viapiana O, Isaia GC. Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of osteoporosis. Reumatismo. 2016 Jun 23;68(1):1-39. doi: 10.4081/reumatismo.2016.870.
PMID: 27339372RESULTWillers C, Norton N, Harvey NC, Jacobson T, Johansson H, Lorentzon M, McCloskey EV, Borgstrom F, Kanis JA; SCOPE review panel of the IOF. Osteoporosis in Europe: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch Osteoporos. 2022 Jan 26;17(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-00969-8.
PMID: 35079919RESULTEngelke K, Lang T, Khosla S, Qin L, Zysset P, Leslie WD, Shepherd JA, Shousboe JT. Clinical Use of Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Advanced Techniques in the Management of Osteoporosis in Adults: the 2015 ISCD Official Positions-Part III. J Clin Densitom. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):393-407. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.06.010.
PMID: 26277853RESULTMichalski AS, Besler BA, Michalak GJ, Boyd SK. CT-based internal density calibration for opportunistic skeletal assessment using abdominal CT scans. Med Eng Phys. 2020 Apr;78:55-63. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.01.009. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
PMID: 32059948RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 6, 2024
First Posted
June 12, 2024
Study Start
June 6, 2024
Primary Completion
June 1, 2026
Study Completion
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
June 10, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-06