NCT06427174

Brief Summary

The study is aimed to determine which of the two methods , either the fascia iliaca block or the caudal block is better in managing the post operative pain and by which decreasing the consumption of analgesic drugs post operatively and making the patient more comfortable.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable surgery

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 18, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 23, 2024

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

June 27, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

May 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 26, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Fascia iliaca block, analgesia, pediatric surgeries

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative analgesia using FLACC score

    Postoperative analgesia using FLACC score

    1-24 hour postiperative

Study Arms (2)

Fascia iliaca group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

For the group who will receive the fascia iliaca block …. After induction of the general anesthesia and before skin incision, fascia iliaca block will be performed in the patient while he is in the supine position after sterilization of skin over the groin area at the side from which split thickness graft will be taken, high frequency ultrasound probe

Drug: Fascia iliaca block

Caudal block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

And the second group will receive the caudal block, we use bupivacaine 0.5 mg / kg. With the patient in the left lateral decubitus position and the hips and knees flexed, the sacral hiatus can be identified .First of all, the posterior superior iliac spines are palpated via anatomical landmarks, the line between both spines (Tuffier's line) representing the base of an equilateral triangle the tip of which indicates the position of the sacral hiatus. The sacrococcygeal ligament can be palpated between the two sacral cornua, which is where the needle should penetrate the skin at an approximate 45° angle. Once the ligament has been passed, a flatter angle is adjusted by descending the needle before it can be advanced to the correct final position.

Drug: Caudal block

Interventions

For the group who will receive the fascia iliaca block …. After induction of the general anesthesia and before skin incision, fascia iliaca block will be performed in the patient while he is in the supine position

Fascia iliaca group

second group will receive the caudal block, we use bupivacaine 0.5 mg / kg.

Caudal block

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 12 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 2- 12 years. ASA I - II Scheduled for split thickness grafting. Availability and suitability of lateral and anterior aspects of the thigh as a donor site.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient's gaurdian refusal to participate in the study. Known allergy to local anesthetics Coagulopathy. Patient with motor or sensory deficits in lower extremities. Prior surgery of the inguinal or suprainguinal area . Children who are morbidly obese (BMI≥30) because ultrasound guided regional anesthesia could be too technically difficult.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (8)

  • Wiegele M, Marhofer P, Lonnqvist PA. Caudal epidural blocks in paediatric patients: a review and practical considerations. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;122(4):509-517. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.11.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.

    PMID: 30857607BACKGROUND
  • Bromage PR. A comparison of the hydrochloride salts of lignocaine and prilocaine for epidural analgesia. Br J Anaesth. 1965 Oct;37(10):753-61. doi: 10.1093/bja/37.10.753. No abstract available.

    PMID: 5847259BACKGROUND
  • Sessler CN, Gosnell MS, Grap MJ, Brophy GM, O'Neal PV, Keane KA, Tesoro EP, Elswick RK. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: validity and reliability in adult intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Nov 15;166(10):1338-44. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2107138.

    PMID: 12421743BACKGROUND
  • Merkel SI, Voepel-Lewis T, Shayevitz JR, Malviya S. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children. Pediatr Nurs. 1997 May-Jun;23(3):293-7.

    PMID: 9220806BACKGROUND
  • Suresh S, Ecoffey C, Bosenberg A, Lonnqvist PA, de Oliveira GS Jr, de Leon Casasola O, de Andres J, Ivani G. The European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy/American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Recommendations on Local Anesthetics and Adjuvants Dosage in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Feb;43(2):211-216. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000702.

    PMID: 29319604BACKGROUND
  • Shteynberg A, Riina LH, Glickman LT, Meringolo JN, Simpson RL. Ultrasound guided lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block: safe and simple anesthesia for harvesting skin grafts. Burns. 2013 Feb;39(1):146-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2012.02.015. Epub 2012 May 30.

    PMID: 22657583BACKGROUND
  • Shank ES, Martyn JA, Donelan MB, Perrone A, Firth PG, Driscoll DN. Ultrasound-Guided Regional Anesthesia for Pediatric Burn Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Study. J Burn Care Res. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):e213-7. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000174.

    PMID: 25412051BACKGROUND
  • Sinha S, Schreiner AJ, Biernaskie J, Nickerson D, Gabriel VA. Treating pain on skin graft donor sites: Review and clinical recommendations. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):954-964. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001615.

    PMID: 28598907BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mohamed Ta Mohamed

    Lecturer doctor

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Patients and anesthesiologist won't know which group is patients will selected
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2024

First Posted

May 23, 2024

Study Start

March 1, 2025

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion

May 1, 2026

Last Updated

June 27, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06