NCT06480370

Brief Summary

This project aims to optimize the methodology to elicite transcranial motor evoked potentials in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of brain surgery. It includes accelerometer measurements and microscope video image to determine movement of the surgical field, making possible minimization of movement during brain stimulation.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
203

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable surgery

Timeline
31mo left

Started Feb 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable surgery

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress33%
Feb 2025Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2024

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 28, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 20, 2025

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2028

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 30, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • threshold of stimulation and patient movement

    threshold of stimulation and patient movement quantified by an accelerometer placed on the forehead of the patient

    during surgery

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • patient movement

    during surgery

  • subjective evaluation of magnitude of motion

    end of surgery

  • quantification of magnitude

    end of surgery

Study Arms (1)

Study Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Application of TES at different stimulation circuits, with different stimulation parameters and recording montages.

Device: ISIS IOM System

Interventions

Application of TES at different stimulation circuits, with different stimulation parameters and recording montages.

Study Arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Informed consent signed by the subject
  • The patient has a supra-tentorial lesion requiring surgery
  • The patient is undergoing neurosurgery with the use of MEP monitoring during surgery to protect functional tissue\* (During routine preparation for the surgery, patients are checked for any relative contraindications as listed in the user manual of the ISIS IOM System (see p. 11, chapter 2.2.4 of the user manual). Every relative contraindication must be weighed against the risk and benefits of the measurement signals which are routinely needed for the surgical intervention. There are no absolute contraindications for the ISIS IOM System.)
  • The patient is older than 18 years

You may not qualify if:

  • No need for MEP monitoring
  • Vulnerable subjects (pregnant, impaired consciousness)
  • People who do not want to participate in the study
  • Emergency procedures in which no consent was obtained before the operation
  • Multiple surgeries on the same patient
  • Preoperative non-affected arm or leg motor deficit (MRC \<5), that is to say, no motor deficit of the arm or leg ipsilateral to the surgery
  • Inhalational anesthesia
  • Persisting neuromuscular blockade
  • Impossibility to place the stimulating or recording electrodes in the appropriate site

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dep. of Neurosurgery, Bern University Hospital

Bern, 3010, Switzerland

RECRUITING

Related Publications (10)

  • Holdefer RN, Skinner SA. Commentary : The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring: evidence, equipoise and outcomes. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Aug;31(4):657-664. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9910-0. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

    PMID: 27481235BACKGROUND
  • Asimakidou E, Abut PA, Raabe A, Seidel K. Motor Evoked Potential Warning Criteria in Supratentorial Surgery: A Scoping Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 4;13(11):2803. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112803.

    PMID: 34199853BACKGROUND
  • Seidel K, Beck J, Stieglitz L, Schucht P, Raabe A. The warning-sign hierarchy between quantitative subcortical motor mapping and continuous motor evoked potential monitoring during resection of supratentorial brain tumors. J Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;118(2):287-96. doi: 10.3171/2012.10.JNS12895. Epub 2012 Nov 30.

    PMID: 23198802BACKGROUND
  • Macdonald DB, Skinner S, Shils J, Yingling C; American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring - a position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Clin Neurophysiol. 2013 Dec;124(12):2291-316. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

    PMID: 24055297BACKGROUND
  • Dulfer SE, Gadella MC, Sahinovic MM, Lange F, Absalom AR, Groen RJM, Szelenyi A, Drost G. Stimulation parameters for motor evoked potentials during intraoperative spinal cord monitoring. A systematic review. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 May;149:70-80. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.02.170. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

    PMID: 36924672BACKGROUND
  • Fujii M, Maesawa S, Motomura K, Futamura M, Hayashi Y, Koba I, Wakabayashi T. Intraoperative subcortical mapping of a language-associated deep frontal tract connecting the superior frontal gyrus to Broca's area in the dominant hemisphere of patients with glioma. J Neurosurg. 2015 Jun;122(6):1390-6. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14945. Epub 2015 Mar 27.

    PMID: 25816090BACKGROUND
  • Kapsalakis IZ, Kapsalaki EZ, Gotsis ED, Verganelakis D, Toulas P, Hadjigeorgiou G, Chung I, Fezoulidis I, Papadimitriou A, Robinson JS, Lee GP, Fountas KN. Preoperative evaluation with FMRI of patients with intracranial gliomas. Radiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:727810. doi: 10.1155/2012/727810. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

    PMID: 22848821BACKGROUND
  • Moiyadi A, Velayutham P, Shetty P, Seidel K, Janu A, Madhugiri V, Singh VK, Patil A, John R. Combined Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring and Subcortical Dynamic Mapping in Motor Eloquent Tumors Allows Safer and Extended Resections. World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e259-e268. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.046. Epub 2018 Aug 21.

    PMID: 30138733BACKGROUND
  • Raabe A, Beck J, Schucht P, Seidel K. Continuous dynamic mapping of the corticospinal tract during surgery of motor eloquent brain tumors: evaluation of a new method. J Neurosurg. 2014 May;120(5):1015-24. doi: 10.3171/2014.1.JNS13909. Epub 2014 Mar 14.

    PMID: 24628613BACKGROUND
  • Schucht P, Seidel K, Beck J, Murek M, Jilch A, Wiest R, Fung C, Raabe A. Intraoperative monopolar mapping during 5-ALA-guided resections of glioblastomas adjacent to motor eloquent areas: evaluation of resection rates and neurological outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Dec;37(6):E16. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.FOCUS14524.

    PMID: 25434385BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Seidel Kathleen, MD

    Department of Neurosurgery

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Pablo Abel Alvarez Abut, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2024

First Posted

June 28, 2024

Study Start

February 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 1, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations