Artificial Intelligence Versus Maunal Planning in Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the artificial intelligence technology helps to improve the efficiency in robot assited spinal surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the AI technology shorter the mannual planning time of screw trajectories? Does the AI technology affect the surgical accuracy? Researchers will compare the artificial intelligence technology to the conventional mannual planning in robotic surgery. Participants who met inclusion criteria and do not have any exclusion criterion will be randomized to artificial intelligence or mannual planning group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable surgery
Started May 2024
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2026
CompletedMay 16, 2024
April 1, 2024
11 months
April 27, 2024
May 12, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The accuracy of screw positioning or placement
according to the Gertzbein and Robbins scale, including grade A (screw was completely within the pedicle), grade B (pedicle cortical breach \<2 mm), grade C (pedicle cortical breach \<4 mm), grade D (pedicle cortical breach \<6 mm), and grade E (pedicle cortical breach \>6 mm). Grade A + B were considered clinically acceptable. The percentage of clinically acceptable screws was recorded.
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The planning time
1 day
postoperative complication
3 month
Study Arms (2)
artificial intelligence planning group
EXPERIMENTALmanual planning group
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
artificial intelligence technology helps to plan screws in robot assisted spinal surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Admission to one of the participating centers;
- Need for and start of robotic spinal surgery
- Patients had complete medical records and imaging data;
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 years;
- Patients with severe comorbidities;
- Patients diagnosed with tumor diseases;
- Inability to carry out the intervention (mental of physical conditions that limited participation);
- Patients with morbid obesity (body mass index \> 40);
- Missing medical records and imaging data;
- Patients with suspected or confirmed pregnancy;
- Patients participating in another RCT with the same clinical endpoint, or interventions possibly compromising the primary outcome;
- No informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2024
First Posted
May 16, 2024
Study Start
May 25, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 16, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04