NCT06318221

Brief Summary

A prospective randomized controlled study compared the effects of perioperative immunonutrition and standard enteral nutrition (EN) on postoperative short-term outcomes of patients with head and neck (HNC). Five days before surgery and the postoperative day 10, immunonutrition support was given to the intervention group (n=17), and standard EN support was given to the control group (n=17). Body analyses were made, food consumption records were taken, NRS-2002 and quality of life scales were applied, and biochemical parameters were recorded.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable head-and-neck-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2019

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2021

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 15, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 19, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submit

March 12, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

head and neck cancerimmunonutritionenteral nutritionPerioperative nutritionNutritional counseling

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (10)

  • Body weight

    Kg

    40 days

  • Body weight loss

    Kg

    40 days

  • Body mass index

    kg/m2

    40 days

  • Resting metabolic rate

    kcal

    40 days

  • Nutrition Risk Screening 2002

    A total score of ≥3 indicates that the patient is at nutritional risk

    40 days

  • The EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    1. Estimate the average of the items that contribute to the scale; this is the raw score. 2. Use a linear transformation to standardise the raw score, so that scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score represents a higher ("better") level of functioning, or a higher ("worse") level of symptoms.

    40 days

  • The EORTC Quality of life - Head and Neck Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-H & N35)

    The head \& neck cancer module incorporates seven multi-item scales that assess pain, swallowing, senses (taste and smell), speech, social eating, social contact and sexuality. There are also eleven single items. For all items and scales, high scores indicate more problems (i.e. there are no function scales in which high scores would mean better functioning).

    40 days

  • Albumin

    g/dL

    40 days

  • C-reactive protein

    mg/L

    40 days

  • Prealbumin

    mg/dL

    40 days

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Length of hospital stay

    40 days

  • Complication development status

    40 days

Study Arms (2)

immunonutrition (intervention group)

EXPERIMENTAL

Immunonutrition enteral products was given to the patients in the intervention group

Dietary Supplement: Experimental (Immunonutrition) Group

standard (control group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard enteral products was given to patients in the control group.

Dietary Supplement: Active Comparator Group ( Standard enteral nutrition)

Interventions

Immunonutrition was given to the patients in the intervention group and ready-to-use liquid in addition to their normal nutrition 5 days before the operation. The patients were instructed to consume three enteral products per day as taken between meals. In the postoperative period, feeding was started in the first 24 hours with the NG tube placed during the operation. The ready-to-use immunonutrition product was given to the patients in the intervention group.

immunonutrition (intervention group)

Standard enteral nutrition was given to patients in the control group in addition to their normal nutrition 5 days before the operation. The patients were instructed to consume three enteral products per day between meals. In the postoperative period, feeding was started in the first 24 hours with the NG tube placed during the operation. Liquid standard enteral nutrition was given to the patients in the control group.

standard (control group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Clinical diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx who will undergo surgery,
  • who agree to receive standard EN or immunonutrition before surgery,
  • those between the ages of 18-75,
  • those with normal hematopoietic (absolute neutrophil count \>1.8x109/L, hemoglobin level ≥9 g/dL) hepatic and renal function

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the head and neck region;
  • Received EN support before the study
  • have an active infection, any autoimmune, renal or hepatic disease, malabsorption, type 1 diabetes or mental illness
  • taking vitamin-mineral supplements and immunosuppressive treatment,
  • Morbidly obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m2), HIV positive, pregnant and breastfeeding individuals

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Erciyes University

Talas, Kayseri, 38280, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Neoplasms

Interventions

Immunonutrition DietPopulation Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by SiteNeoplasms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

DietNutritional Physiological PhenomenaDiet, Food, and NutritionPhysiological PhenomenaDemographyPopulation Characteristics

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients were classified according to tumor location (oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx) and body weight loss, approximately equally in both groups. Accordingly, patients were randomly assigned (by computer) into either the immunonutrition (intervention group) or standard EN (control group) groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Posted

March 19, 2024

Study Start

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion

February 1, 2021

Study Completion

February 1, 2021

Last Updated

March 19, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations