the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks (SIFIB) in Elderly Patients
Comparison of the Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Blocks (SIFIB) in Elderly Patients With Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the effect of the pericapsular nerve group (PENG) and suprainguinal fascia iliaca blocks (SIFIB) on pain management in elderly patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures. The participants will be patients determined to have proximal femoral nailing. According to randomisation, each participant will receive either PENG or SIFIB postoperatively after spinal anaesthesia. The investigator will measure postoperative pain scores, total amount of analgesic consumption and motor ability postoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 19, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 15, 2024
CompletedApril 20, 2025
April 1, 2025
2.4 years
February 19, 2024
April 16, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
pain scores
the numeric rating scale (which ranges from 0 to 10, where zero represents the absence of pain, and 10 signifies the worst imaginable pain)
postoperative 24 hour
Secondary Outcomes (1)
rescue analgesia
postoperative 24 hour
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONAll patients received standard spinal anaesthesia procedures with multimodal pain protocol postoperatively.
PENG block
EXPERIMENTALAll patients received standard spinal anaesthesia procedures with PENG block postoperatively.
SIFI block
EXPERIMENTALAll patients received standard spinal anaesthesia procedures with SIFIB postoperatively.
Interventions
PENG block was performed by the primary investigator (B.C) following proper skin disinfection with the patient in the supine position. Under the guidance of a low-frequency curvilinear ultrasound probe, the iliopubic eminence and the psoas tendon were identified, and local anaesthetic as 30 mL 0.375% bupivacaine was injected between the periosteum and psoas tendon following negative aspiration.
The high-frequency linear probe was placed medial to the anterosuperior iliac spine in a parasagittal orientation to visualize the bow tie appearance formed by the sartorius's internal oblique and iliacus muscles. The needle tip was placed under fascia iliaca through an in-plane approach, and local anaesthetic as 30 mL 0.375% bupivacaine was injected from the caudad to the cephalic direction.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 65
- Patients scheduled for proximal femoral nailing
- Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification of I to IV.
You may not qualify if:
- refusal to participate
- a history of neurological deficits or neuropathy
- infection at the site of block application
- coagulopathy
- allergy to local anaesthetics
- patients with severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency or renal impairment
- mental illness.
- prolonged surgery due to orthopaedic complications of more than 3 hours, necessitating conversion of spinal anaesthesia to general anaesthesia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Haseki Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (2)
Vamshi C, Sinha C, Kumar A, Kumar A, Kumari P, Kumar A, Kumar S, Arun SK. Comparison of the efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) block versus suprainguinal fascia iliaca block (SFIB) in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized control trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Apr;67(4):364-369. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_311_22. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
PMID: 37303868BACKGROUNDAliste J, Layera S, Bravo D, Jara A, Munoz G, Barrientos C, Wulf R, Branez J, Finlayson RJ, Tran Q. Randomized comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block and suprainguinal fascia iliaca block for total hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Oct;46(10):874-878. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102997. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
PMID: 34290085BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Berna Caliskan
Haseki Training and Research Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The orthopaedic surgeon responsible for the study was blinded to the study groups. This surgeon was the sole evaluator of postoperative pain scores and total analgesia consumption.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 19, 2024
First Posted
February 26, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 1, 2024
Study Completion
June 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share