Comparison of Interscalene and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block in Shoulder Surgery
Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Consumption and Pain in Shoulder Surgery Patients Undergoing Interscalene and Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Blocks
1 other identifier
interventional
34
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Early postoperative pain after shoulder surgery is a major concern and distress for patients and orthopedic surgeons. Adequate pain control; It is vital for all aspects of patient recovery, including mental state, nutrition, cost of care period, rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall post-surgery outcomes.Single analgesic regimens are not always effective in controlling moderate to severe postoperative pain.Therefore, multimodal pain management is preferred and is currently recommended for early postoperative pain control.Regional anesthesia is preferred in shoulder surgery as an effective way to provide anesthesia and postoperative analgesia.To ensure adequate postoperative pain control, nerve supply to the synovium, capsule, joint surfaces, ligaments, periosteum and shoulder muscles must be blocked.Interscalene blocks are well studied and established means of providing analgesia following shoulder surgery and are considered the gold standard mode of regional anesthesia.Pericapsular nerve group block is a new block that provides a pericapsular distribution with local anesthetic infiltration around the glenohumeral joint and provides analgesia without motor blockage by reaching the sensory nerve branches of the glenohumeral joint.The aim of this study was to compare the results between interscalene block and pericapsular nerve group block in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2021
CompletedJanuary 22, 2021
January 1, 2021
5 months
January 17, 2021
January 20, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale
Visual Analogue Scale
5 months
Study Arms (2)
interscalene block
ACTIVE COMPARATORPENG block
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and over
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2
- shoulder surgery
You may not qualify if:
- under 18 years old
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 3 and above
- who are allergic to local anesthetics
- patients with infection at the injection site
- pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Patel MS, Abboud JA, Sethi PM. Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):e416-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
PMID: 32844751RESULTSripada R, Bowens C Jr. Regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder and upper arm surgery upper extremity update--2005 to present. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012 Winter;50(1):26-46. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31821a0284.
PMID: 22227421RESULTYamak Altinpulluk E, Teles AS, Galluccio F, Simon DG, Olea MS, Salazar C, Fajardo Perez M. Pericapsular nerve group block for postoperative shoulder pain: A cadaveric radiological evaluation. J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110058. Epub 2020 Sep 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 32987232RESULTTran J, Peng PWH, Agur AMR. Anatomical study of the innervation of glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joint capsules: implications for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100152. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100152. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 30635516RESULT
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2021
First Posted
January 22, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2021
Study Completion
July 31, 2021
Last Updated
January 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01