Responses to E-cigarette Message Source and Presentation
Identifying and Examining the Effects of Source and Presentation on Responses to Electronic Cigarette Public Education Messages in Young Adult Vapers and Non-vapers - Part 1
2 other identifiers
interventional
848
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to use crowdsourcing to test the effects of a message source (expert and peer) and message presentation types (one-sided and two-sided) to identify the optimal message type for young adults who vape and do not vape.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 23, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 17, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 14, 2026
CompletedJanuary 14, 2026
December 1, 2025
1 month
January 17, 2024
November 22, 2025
December 20, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Message Acceptance
Participants' self-reported message acceptance were measured by using a five-point Likert scale using five items assessing whether participants thought the message was worth remembering, grabbed their attention, powerful, convincing, and meaningful on a scale from 1 (Strongly disagree) to 5 (Strongly agree). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score, and this was done for each arm for each vaping status. Higher scores indicate more more message acceptance, therefore better outcomes.
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Harm Perceptions
Harm perceptions was measured by a single item e-cigarette harm perceptions question assessing participants' perceived absolute harm of e-cigarette use on a scale from 1 (Not at all harmful) to 10 (Very harmful). Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score. This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers). Higher scores indicate greater vaping harm perceptions, therefore indicating better outcome.
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Negative Cognition
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Message Anger
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Message Liking
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Source Trust
After exposure to each messages (approximately up to 20 minutes total), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
Attitudes
After exposure to all messages (approximately up to 45 minutes), measured during a single study visit on Day 1.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Expert, one-sided
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to the expert, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
Expert, two-sided
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to the expert, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
Peer, one-sided
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to the peer, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
Peer, two-sided
EXPERIMENTALParticipants assigned to the peer, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
Interventions
Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.
Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.
Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.
Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- US residents ages 18-24
- Fluent in English
- Reporting either vaping in the past 30 days or not having vaped in the past 30 days but susceptible to vaping
You may not qualify if:
- Age less than 18 or above 24
- Not fluent in English
- Not a member of partnering crowdsourcing behavioral research platform conducting the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UMass Chan Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Donghee Nicole Lee, Assistant Professor
- Organization
- University of Hawaii Cancer Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donghee N Lee, PhD
UMass Chan Medical School
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postdoctoral Fellow
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2024
First Posted
February 23, 2024
Study Start
November 5, 2024
Primary Completion
December 5, 2024
Study Completion
December 17, 2024
Last Updated
January 14, 2026
Results First Posted
January 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share