Virtual Reality for Pain Management During Dupilumab Injection
VR-DERMA
Use of Virtual Reality to Improve Pain and Anxiety Management of Children During Dupilumab Injection for Atopic Dermatitis (VR-DERMA)
1 other identifier
interventional
98
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The aim of this within-subject randomized study is to examine the efficacy of a VR immersive game for pain and anxiety management of children during the subcutaneous injection of dupilumab for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. We will recruit children from 6 to 17 years. The main research question is:
- 1.Does VR immersive game will generate less anxiety and pain than standard procedures, for children receiving dupilumab injection for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis?
- 2.Does the occurence of side effects is similar between both study groups?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 27, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 16, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2028
August 24, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.6 years
August 17, 2023
August 18, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
mean difference in pain intensity score between sequences
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for children 6 years and older. The NRS is an 11-item scale for pain intensity ranging from 0 to 10; 0=no pain to 10= worst pain ever felt.
Immediately after the procedure on day 1 and a week later on day 2 (T2 and T4) (self-report of pain levels during the procedure).
mean difference in anxiety between sequences
The level of anxiety will be assessed using the Child Fear Scale (CFS). It consists of five faces ranging from 0 (no fear/anxiety) through 4 (extremely fearful/anxious). The child is asked to indicate which face shows best how he/she felt during the procedure.
Immediately after the procedure on day 1 and a week later on day 2 (T2 and T4) (self-report of anxiety levels during the procedure).
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Mean difference in cognitive, affective and sensory components of pain as well as sense of presence in VR and engagement into the game between groups
Reported immediately after the procedure on day 1 and a week later on day 2 (T2 and T4)
children's satisfaction levels
Reported immediately after the procedure on day 1 and a week later on day 2 (T2 and T4)
healthcare professionals' satisfaction levels
Reported immediately after the sequence, a week later on day 2 (T4)
Occurrence of adverse events
Reported immediately after the procedure on day 1 and a week later on day 2 (T2 and T4)
parents' satisfaction levels
Reported immediately after the sequence a week later on day 2 (T4)
Study Arms (2)
Virtual Reality Distraction
EXPERIMENTALThe child will play with the VR device for five minutes prior to the subcutaneous injection.
Standard Treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard care consisting of injecting dupilumab subcutaneously without any distractive measure, with the child having full knowledge of the intervention
Interventions
For the experimental treatment, the child will play with the VR device for five minutes prior to the subcutaneous injection to reduce pain. The VR game Dream and the Pico Neo 4 VR headset were designed by Paperplane Therapeutics for the pediatric population. Participants will be able to direct laser beams at magical elements such as trolls and crystals. Since it is a no-success game, participants can enjoy it regardless of their past video game experience.
Standard care consisting of injecting dupilumab subcutaneously without any distractive measure, with the child having full knowledge of the intervention. Use of any co-interventions for pain management (music, comforting, child life specialist or other) during this sequence will be documented
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- between the ages of 6 to 17 years old,
- suffering from moderate to severe atopic dermatitis and receiving or about to start subcutaneous injections of dupilumab,
- in the presence of a consenting parent who can understand, read, and write either French or English.
You may not qualify if:
- have a diagnosed cognitive impairment precluding them from playing a virtual reality game,
- suffer from epilepsy considering the nature of the intervention,
- cannot be in a sitting position during the procedure as the virtual reality game requires an angle of at least 30 degrees for head-tracking.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
St. Justine's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 3C5, Canada
CHU Sainte-Justine
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5, Canada
Related Publications (31)
Stander S. Atopic Dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1136-1143. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2023911. No abstract available.
PMID: 33761208BACKGROUNDThibodeaux Q, Smith MP, Ly K, Beck K, Liao W, Bhutani T. A review of dupilumab in the treatment of atopic diseases. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2019;15(9):2129-2139. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1582403. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
PMID: 30785362BACKGROUNDKamata M, Tada Y. A Literature Review of Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. JID Innov. 2021 Jul 30;1(3):100042. doi: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100042. eCollection 2021 Sep.
PMID: 34909737BACKGROUNDCather J, Young M, DiRuggiero DC, Tofte S, Williams L, Gonzalez T. A Review of Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults, Adolescents, and Children Aged 6 and Up. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022 Sep;12(9):2013-2038. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00778-y. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
PMID: 36028787BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Meyer WJ 3rd, Ramirez M, Roberts L, Seibel EJ, Atzori B, Sharar SR, Patterson DR. Feasibility of articulated arm mounted Oculus Rift Virtual Reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):397-401. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0058.
PMID: 24892204BACKGROUNDDascal J, Reid M, IsHak WW, Spiegel B, Recacho J, Rosen B, Danovitch I. Virtual Reality and Medical Inpatients: A Systematic Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;14(1-2):14-21. eCollection 2017 Jan-Feb.
PMID: 28386517BACKGROUNDGarrett B, Taverner T, Masinde W, Gromala D, Shaw C, Negraeff M. A rapid evidence assessment of immersive virtual reality as an adjunct therapy in acute pain management in clinical practice. Clin J Pain. 2014 Dec;30(12):1089-98. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000064.
PMID: 24535053BACKGROUNDGuo C, Deng H, Yang J. Effect of virtual reality distraction on pain among patients with hand injury undergoing dressing change. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):115-20. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12626. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
PMID: 24899241BACKGROUNDJeffs D, Dorman D, Brown S, Files A, Graves T, Kirk E, Meredith-Neve S, Sanders J, White B, Swearingen CJ. Effect of virtual reality on adolescent pain during burn wound care. J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):395-408. doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000019.
PMID: 24823326BACKGROUNDDumoulin S, Bouchard S, Ellis J, Lavoie KL, Vezina MP, Charbonneau P, Tardif J, Hajjar A. A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Use of Virtual Reality for Needle-Related Procedures in Children and Adolescents in the Emergency Department. Games Health J. 2019 Aug;8(4):285-293. doi: 10.1089/g4h.2018.0111. Epub 2019 May 24.
PMID: 31135178BACKGROUNDGold JI, Mahrer NE. Is Virtual Reality Ready for Prime Time in the Medical Space? A Randomized Control Trial of Pediatric Virtual Reality for Acute Procedural Pain Management. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Apr 1;43(3):266-275. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsx129.
PMID: 29053848BACKGROUNDSchneider SM, Kisby CK, Flint EP. Effect of virtual reality on time perception in patients receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):555-64. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0852-7. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
PMID: 20336327BACKGROUNDWiederhold MD, Gao K, Wiederhold BK. Clinical use of virtual reality distraction system to reduce anxiety and pain in dental procedures. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014 Jun;17(6):359-65. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0203.
PMID: 24892198BACKGROUNDSharar SR, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR. Factors influencing the efficacy of virtual reality distraction analgesia during postburn physical therapy: preliminary results from 3 ongoing studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S43-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.09.004.
PMID: 18036981BACKGROUNDSchmitt YS, Hoffman HG, Blough DK, Patterson DR, Jensen MP, Soltani M, Carrougher GJ, Nakamura D, Sharar SR. A randomized, controlled trial of immersive virtual reality analgesia, during physical therapy for pediatric burns. Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):61-8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2010.07.007. Epub 2010 Aug 7.
PMID: 20692769BACKGROUNDMcMurtry CM, Pillai Riddell R, Taddio A, Racine N, Asmundson GJ, Noel M, Chambers CT, Shah V; HELPinKids&Adults Team. Far From "Just a Poke": Common Painful Needle Procedures and the Development of Needle Fear. Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S3-11. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000272.
PMID: 26352920BACKGROUNDNoel M, Rabbitts JA, Fales J, Chorney J, Palermo TM. The influence of pain memories on children's and adolescents' post-surgical pain experience: A longitudinal dyadic analysis. Health Psychol. 2017 Oct;36(10):987-995. doi: 10.1037/hea0000530. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
PMID: 28726472BACKGROUNDBailey B, Daoust R, Doyon-Trottier E, Dauphin-Pierre S, Gravel J. Validation and properties of the verbal numeric scale in children with acute pain. Pain. 2010 May;149(2):216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.008. Epub 2010 Feb 25.
PMID: 20188471BACKGROUNDCastarlenas E, Jensen MP, von Baeyer CL, Miro J. Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):376-383. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000406.
PMID: 27518484BACKGROUNDMiro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain. Eur J Pain. 2009 Nov;13(10):1089-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
PMID: 19726211BACKGROUNDTsze DS, von Baeyer CL, Pahalyants V, Dayan PS. Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for Children Aged 4 to 17 Years With Acute Pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):691-702.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PMID: 29107409BACKGROUNDMcMurtry CM, Noel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ. Children's fear during procedural pain: preliminary investigation of the Children's Fear Scale. Health Psychol. 2011 Nov;30(6):780-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024817. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
PMID: 21806301BACKGROUNDMcKinley S, Coote K, Stein-Parbury J. Development and testing of a Faces Scale for the assessment of anxiety in critically ill patients. J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jan;41(1):73-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02508.x.
PMID: 12519290BACKGROUNDGullone E. The development of normal fear: a century of research. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000 Jun;20(4):429-51. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00034-3.
PMID: 10832548BACKGROUNDBringuier S, Dadure C, Raux O, Dubois A, Picot MC, Capdevila X. The perioperative validity of the visual analog anxiety scale in children: a discriminant and useful instrument in routine clinical practice to optimize postoperative pain management. Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):737-44. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af00e4.
PMID: 19690240BACKGROUNDStoltz P, Manworren RCB. Comparison of Children's Venipuncture Fear and Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial of EMLA(R) and J-Tip Needleless Injection System(R). J Pediatr Nurs. 2017 Nov-Dec;37:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Aug 18.
PMID: 28823623BACKGROUNDLee VY, Booy R, Skinner R, Edwards KM. The effect of exercise on vaccine-related pain, anxiety and fear during HPV vaccinations in adolescents. Vaccine. 2018 May 31;36(23):3254-3259. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.069. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
PMID: 29709446BACKGROUNDHoffman HG, Rodriguez RA, Gonzalez M, Bernardy M, Pena R, Beck W, Patterson DR, Meyer WJ 3rd. Immersive Virtual Reality as an Adjunctive Non-opioid Analgesic for Pre-dominantly Latin American Children With Large Severe Burn Wounds During Burn Wound Cleaning in the Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Aug 8;13:262. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00262. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31440148BACKGROUNDMcGrath PJ, Walco GA, Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Brown MT, Davidson K, Eccleston C, Finley GA, Goldschneider K, Haverkos L, Hertz SH, Ljungman G, Palermo T, Rappaport BA, Rhodes T, Schechter N, Scott J, Sethna N, Svensson OK, Stinson J, von Baeyer CL, Walker L, Weisman S, White RE, Zajicek A, Zeltzer L; PedIMMPACT. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008 Sep;9(9):771-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 17.
PMID: 18562251BACKGROUNDTesler MD, Savedra MC, Holzemer WL, Wilkie DJ, Ward JA, Paul SM. The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children's and adolescents' pain intensity. Res Nurs Health. 1991 Oct;14(5):361-71. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770140507.
PMID: 1891622BACKGROUNDPrice DD, Bush FM, Long S, Harkins SW. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain. 1994 Feb;56(2):217-226. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90097-3.
PMID: 8008411BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sylvie Le May, PhD
St. Justine's Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2023
First Posted
December 27, 2023
Study Start
May 16, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share