Comparison of Peer-Led Simulation Facilitation Methods on Nursing Students

NCT06171815 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: 2023/16-25
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 70
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

There are limited studies in the literature on the peer-led facilitator involved in each stage of the simulation in simulation-based experience in nursing education. The purpose of this research is to examine the effect of having a competent senior nursing undergraduate student with simulation knowledge and experience as a facilitator at every stage of the simulation, on the effectiveness of the simulation (Simulation Effectiveness Tool), and on the participants' satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. Method: This research is a prospective, randomized, crossover-designed experimental type of research. Structured Student Information Form, Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool, Student Satisfaction, and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale will be used to collect data. The population of the research consists of all students enrolled in the first year of the Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing at the University of Health Sciences. Since voluntary participation in the research is based, students who want to participate will constitute the sample. Students will be divided into two groups of eight and will undergo two simulations for two consecutive days. Students in the first arm completed the simulation under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the second day; Students in the second arm will receive simulation training under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the second day.

Conditions

Simulation of Physical Illness; Nurse's Role

Keywords

simulation, peer-led, facilitation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

• Simulation Effectiveness

  Output regarding students' perceptions of the effectiveness of learning in a simulation environment. It will be measured with the Modified Simulation Effectiveness Tool. The measurement tool has 19 items and four subscales. Sub-dimensions of the measuring tool; These are prebriefing, learning, confidence and debriefing. The preliminary information sub-dimension consists of two items, the learning sub-dimension consists of six items, the trust sub-dimension consists of six items, and the analysis sub-dimension consists of five items.

  Through study completion, an average of 1 months

• Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning

  Outcome regarding students' attitudes and beliefs about simulation. It will be measured by the Student Satisfaction and Learning Self-Confidence Scale. The scale, which is widely used to measure students' attitudes and beliefs about simulation, was published by the National League for Nurses (NLN) (Franklin, Burns and Lee 2014). It consists of two subscales: "satisfaction with learning" and "self-confidence" and a total of 13 items. In the satisfaction with learning sub-dimension; Five items measuring satisfaction with the teaching method, variety of learning materials, facilitation, motivation and overall suitability of the simulation are included in the self-confidence subscale; There are eight sub-items in content adequacy: self-confidence, content necessity, skill development, available resources and information on how to get help to solve clinical problems in the simulation.

  Through study completion, an average of 1 months

Study Arms (2)

First Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Students in the first arm received simulation training under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the first day, and under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the second day.

Behavioral: Scenario-based simulation

Second Arm

EXPERIMENTAL

Students in the second arm received simulation training under the leadership of an instructor facilitator on the first day and under the leadership of a peer facilitator on the second day.

Behavioral: Scenario-based simulation

Interventions

Scenario-based simulation BEHAVIORAL

Scenario-based simulation prepared for Respiratory Activity and Diabetes Management topics in the course curriculum

First Arm; Second Arm

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 65 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Being 18 years or older,
• Having taken the Health Assessment course,
• Experienced education with simulation for the first time,
• Being willing and able to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

• Incomplete filling of Data Collection Forms,
• Not attending the simulation training on the day and time.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University: lead

Study Sites (1)

University of Health Sciences

Istanbul, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

• Niu Y, Liu T, Li K, Sun M, Sun Y, Wang X, Yang X. Effectiveness of simulation debriefing methods in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105113. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105113. Epub 2021 Aug 27.

  PMID: 34492539 BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Demet İnangil

CONTACT

05303021160; demet.inangil@sbu.edu.tr

İlayda Türkoğlu

CONTACT

05073819491; ilayda.turkoglu@sbu.edu.tr

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: OTHER
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Associate Proffessor

Model Details: This research is a prospective, randomized, crossover-designed experimental type research.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: November 21, 2023
• First Posted: December 15, 2023
• Study Start: December 15, 2023
• Primary Completion: January 1, 2024
• Study Completion: January 15, 2024
• Last Updated: December 15, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-12

Locations

TU (1)