Low-dose Maximal-intent Versus Controlled-tempo Resistance Training on Quality-of-life in Older Adults
Comparison of Two Low-dose Resistance Training Modalities on Strength, Functional Capacity, and Quality-of-life in Healthy, Community-dwelling, Untrained Older Adults: a Randomised Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aims of this study were to:
- 1.Compare the effects of low-dose Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training on untrained healthy older adults' quality-of-life, functional capacity, and strength.
- 2.Qualitatively explore perceptions of Maximal Intent and Controlled Tempo Resistance Training in older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable quality-of-life
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2024
CompletedMay 23, 2025
November 1, 2023
1 year
October 29, 2023
May 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Quality-of-life
Participant quality of life (measured through focus group questions \& SF-36)
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Balance
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
6-minute Walk Test
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Timed-up-and-go
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
30-second sit-to-stand (30s-Sit-to-Stand)
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
Strength
At baseline and Week 1, mid (Week 4), and post (Week 9), out of a total study duration of 9 weeks.
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Maximal-intent Resistance Training - 3x5 (MI3x5)
EXPERIMENTALThe max-intent group were instructed and encouraged to deliberately commit to exerting maximal effort and force during the concentric phase of the leg press with the intention of achieving the greatest velocity possible. This group completed 3 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% one-repetition maximum.
Maximal-intent Resistance Training - 5x5 (MI5x5)
EXPERIMENTALThe max-intent group were instructed and encouraged to deliberately commit to exerting maximal effort and force during the concentric phase of the leg press with the intention of achieving the greatest velocity possible. This group completed 5 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% one-repetition maximum.
Controlled-tempo Resistance Training - 3x5 (CT3x5)
EXPERIMENTALThe controlled-tempo group followed a metronome for both eccentric and concentric phases of the leg press with the intention of maintaining a steady three-second concentric and three-second eccentric. This group completed 3 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% one-repetition maximum.
Controlled-tempo Resistance Training - 5x5 (CT5x5)
EXPERIMENTALThe controlled-tempo group followed a metronome for both eccentric and concentric phases of the leg press with the intention of maintaining a steady three-second concentric and three-second eccentric. This group completed 5 sets of 5 repetitions at 60% one-repetition maximum.
Interventions
Leg Press resistance training at 60% one-rep-max for three sets of five repetitions
Leg Press resistance training at 60% one-rep-max for five sets of five repetitions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants were eligible if they were between 30-60 years old
- Uninjured
- Had no cardiovascular or neuromuscular conditions
- Had not participated in lower-limb resistance training in the previous six months.
You may not qualify if:
- Participants were excluded if they had either taken part in any lower-limb resistance training in the last six months
- Had underlying health condition(s) that prevented them from participating in resistance training
- Regularly met or exceeded the UK recommended physical activity guideline of 150-minutes of moderate to intense physical activity per week.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northumbria University
Newcastle, Tyne and Wear, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Pearson LT, Behm DG, Goodall S, Mason R, Stuart S, Barry G. Effects of maximal-versus submaximal-intent resistance training on functional capacity and strength in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Jul 16;14(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00526-x.
PMID: 35842655BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2023
First Posted
November 9, 2023
Study Start
May 30, 2023
Primary Completion
June 5, 2024
Study Completion
June 5, 2024
Last Updated
May 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share