A Municipality Implemented Behavioural Intervention to Improve Quality of Life Among Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Ageing is associated with circadian rhythm sleep disorders, poor sleep at night, less physical activity and more time spent indoors, affecting the wellbeing of older adults. Their sleep and mood could benefit from daytime outdoor physical activity, exposure to daylight, better indoor lighting and sleep routines. However, maintaining or increasing one's physical activity can be challenging depending on individual behavioural conditions, e.g., having the physical and cognitive capacity (capability), finding the activity enjoyable and relevant to one's needs (motivation), and having a supportive social and physical environment (opportunity), such as a walk-friendly environment. To address these challenges, a complex behavioural intervention was developed. The intervention is delivered as a web-based course ('Light, activity and sleep in my daily life', LAS) that targets light-related behaviour, outdoor walking and sleep behaviour among community-dwelling older adults. This protocol describes a pilot case study aiming to evaluate the usability and usefulness of the LAS intervention, the intervention outcomes and whether changes to routines are sustained. Eligible intervention participants (target N=40) are Swedish-speaking adults (≥ 70 years), living in one-person households in apartments in four municipalities. Participants complete questionnaires assessing intervention outcome measures (e.g., quality of life), are interviewed about their daily routines, and wear an accelerometer which tracks activity and rest at the baseline. Participants then enrol in a 9-week course, including self-studies at home and four physical meetings at the senior citizen meeting point. Baseline measures are repeated after the course, at 3, 6 and 10 months after baseline. In addition, participants evaluate the intervention's usability and usefulness after the course at 3 months and are interviewed at 6 months after baseline about perceived enablers and inhibitors to daytime outdoor walking. Results will inform a subsequent larger case study focused on optimising the LAS intervention's content and delivery procedures to enable an intervention better integrated into municipal health promotion services/strategies. An anticipated long-term outcome is continued active ageing and independence.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable quality-of-life
Started May 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable quality-of-life
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 16, 2026
February 4, 2025
January 1, 2025
2.4 years
January 24, 2025
January 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Usability
System Usability Scale score. The usability of the intervention, that is, if the online content is easy for the intervention participants to use, will be evaluated through a usability testing questionnaire (perceptions of complexity, integration of functions, consistency). Following published instructions on scoring of the 10-item System Usability Scale (SUS), a total usability score will be calculated ranging from 0 to 100. Higher SUS scores indicate greater usability. Based on empirical evaluations of the SUS, a SUS score below 50 indicates usability difficulties, while scores in the 70s and 80s are considered promising.
At one timepoint: 3 months after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Mood
At four timepoints: baseline, 3, 6 and 13 months after baseline
Sleep quality
At four timepoints: baseline, 3, 6 and 13 months after baseline
Behavioural skill
At four timepoints: baseline, 3, 6 and 13 months after baseline
Quality of life
At four timepoints: baseline, 3, 6 and 13 months after baseline
Sleep (activity and rest patterns)
At four timepoints: baseline, 3, 6 and 13 months after baseline. Duration of time over which each participant is assessed: 7 days (not used during shower)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Computer anxiety
At two timepoints: baseline and 3 months after baseline
Lighting quality
At two timepoints: baseline and 3 months after baseline
Study Arms (1)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALAll participants receive the same intervention, including noninvasive approaches (both education and behavioural).
Interventions
The intervention is complex in that it considers multiple factors (e.g., light-related behaviour, physical activity and sleep behaviour) and multiple components (e.g., cognitive goal setting and implementation). The intervention is delivered as a web-based course on a digital learning platform. Course material is placed in nine modules covering electric lighting, daylight, physical activity outdoors and sleep. Besides online material, the course includes a test kit containing light bulbs, a sleep mask, a checklist for the room inventory, a cap, a notebook, and a sleep diary. The purpose of the test kit is to encourage experimentation and provide handouts and printed copies to facilitate the completion of assignments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 70 and over, ambulatory and sighted,
- Swedish speaking,
- living independently in one-person households in ordinary apartments and
- receiving no or limited home care services.
You may not qualify if:
- Study participants will be excluded if they have any condition that makes it difficult to participate.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lund Universitylead
Study Sites (4)
Gothenburg Municipality
Gothenburg, Sweden
Jönköping Municipality
Jönköping, Sweden
Lund Municipality
Lund, Sweden
Malmö Municipality
Malmo, Sweden
Related Publications (1)
Gerhardsson KM, Hassan M, Tornberg AB, Schmidt SM. Usability and feasibility of an online intervention for older adults to support changes to routines and the home ('Light, activity and sleep in my daily life'). BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):2808. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20309-y.
PMID: 39402489BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2025
First Posted
February 4, 2025
Study Start
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 16, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 16, 2026
Last Updated
February 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share