Drug-coated Balloons and Drug-eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients
Long-Term Performance of Drug-coated Balloons and Drug-eluting Stents in Diabetic Patients: a Real-world, Prospective Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Drug-eluting stents (DES) have long been recommended as the default device for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) angioplasty is similar to plain old balloon angioplasty procedurally, but there is an anti-proliferative medication paclitaxel-coated on the balloon. DCB angioplasty has the following advantages compared to DES implantation: Firstly, the drug in DCB is uniformly distributed and released, whereas the drug release of DES via the stent platform is uneven -85% of the vascular wall is not covered by the stent strut. Secondly, there is no alloy in the vessel after DCB angioplasty, while the coronary stent platform and polymer might cause temporal or persistent inflammatory response leading to intimal hyperplasia. Finally, there is no metal cage restraining vessel motion after DCB, and the physiological function of coronary arteries would be maintained. Currently, DCB constitutes an important treatment option in ISR, which is endorsed by the 2018 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. In addition, some interventional cardiologist has also applied DCB in de novo lesions in their clinical practice. Diabetes is associated with worse outcomes after coronary revascularization and has been identified as an independent predictor of adverse events in patients with cardiovascular disease. Although some small sample size RCTs and observational studies have suggested that the clinical prognosis of DCB is non-inferior to the drug-eluting stent (DES), there is still a lack of evidence comparing the DCB versus DES for de novo or ISR coronary lesions in diabetic patients. The current study aims to compare the long-term efficacy of DCB to DES in de novo or ISR coronary lesions in diabetic patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 10, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedFebruary 12, 2026
February 1, 2026
7.8 years
June 29, 2023
February 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE)
DoCE is a composite clinical endpoint of Cardiac cause death, Target vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR).
24 months
Other Outcomes (10)
POCE
1 month, and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
All-cause death
1 month, and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
Non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI)
1 month, and 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Drug-coated balloon
Paclitaxel coated balloon
Drug-eluting stent
Second-generation eluting stents
Interventions
Drug-eluting stent is composed of a metal stent, primer, and drug coating.
Paclitaxel is a pharmacologically active substance for anti-neointima.
Eligibility Criteria
All diabetic patients who received PCI with one or more drug-coated balloons only or drug-eluting stents only to treat ISR or de novo lesions
You may qualify if:
- Patients with diabetes mellitus
- Received PCI by a drug-coated balloons only strategy or drug-eluting stents only strategy
You may not qualify if:
- Under the age of 18
- Unable to give informed consent
- Currently participating in another trial or participants unable to comply to follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xijing Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Ling Tao
Xi'an, Shannxi, 710032, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ling Tao, MD, Ph.D.
Xijing Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Chao Gao, MD, Ph.D.
Xijing Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Cardiology, Director of the department of Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2023
First Posted
July 10, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2023
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share