NCT02219594

Brief Summary

In-stent restenosis is a major reason of coronary heart disease recurrence .Even in drug eluting stent(DES), Restenosis rate could be up to 10% in diabetes and complex lesions though it was about 3-5% in general. It is particularly important that in-stent restenosis after implantation was early diagnosed and detected. The evaluation of OCT imaging is more accurate for narrow area calculation, more clear for narrow organization structure and more specific for detecting tissue types.It is currently the best way for restenosis histologic diagnosis.But it has many weakness such as the higher cost,an invasive test, expensive instrument, relatively complicated to operate,and etc.In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of stent restenosis. The improvement of spatial resolution of Gemstone CT can effectively improve the imaging quality and the measurement's accuracy of coronary artery stents.The diagnostic value of in-stent restenosis of Gemstone CT is higher than of the 320-detector row spiral CT. To a certain extent, the gemstone CT can replace OCT for examining the in-stent restenosis. This study will examine the degree of in-stent restenosis by the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT and compare the two ways on the basis of the result of OCT.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2014

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2014

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

August 19, 2014

Status Verified

August 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2014

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

gemstone CT320-detector row spiral CToptical coherence tomography(OCT)in-stent restenosiscoronary heart disease

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of detection of in-stent restenosis with the gemstone CT as compared to the 320-detector row spiral CT will be investigated

    Masked examiners (CT specialists) will evaluate and compare the degree of in-stent restenosis of the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT images for the presence and features of in-stent restenosis. In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.

    On the day in which a patient receives the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT, estimated to take 10 mins

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Radiation burden of the the gemstone CT or the 320-detector row spiral CT and OCT

    one month

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Measurement of the physical characteristics of in-stent restenosis structures seen on OCT

    On the day in which a patient receives the check of OCT

Study Arms (2)

Gemstone CT

EXPERIMENTAL

Gemstone CT :Discovery CT750 HD(high definition) ,GE(General Electric Co.) Healthcare, Milwaukee; CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient

Device: CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis

320-detector row spiral CT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

320-detector row spiral CT:Aquilion One, Toshiba, Nasu, Japan. CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient .

Device: CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis

Interventions

Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient who was suspected in-stent restenosis.About after 10 days,they would accept the check of OCT which wold be the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.

Also known as: Gemstone CT, 320-detector row spiral CT, OCT
320-detector row spiral CTGemstone CT

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 20-80, All genders
  • Unlimited time of implantation of coronary artery stents
  • Myocardial ischemia symptoms such as Chest tightness and/or chest pain in patients after stent implantation
  • No clinical symptoms, but myocardial ischemia suggested by other noninvasive tests
  • Routine re-testing 9-12 months after stent implantation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 120 umol/L)
  • Allergy of contrast
  • Severe heart failure
  • Uncontrollable heart rate or contraindication of taking metoprolol
  • Unstable condition
  • the ventricular rate beyond 70 beats / min and irregular rhythm after adjusting.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Xuzhou Central Hospital

Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (7)

  • Colombo A, Latib A. [Treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis with another drug-eluting stent: do not fail the second time!]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1120-2. No abstract available. Spanish.

    PMID: 19000485BACKGROUND
  • Windecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S, Buszman P, Trznadel S, Linke A, Lenk K, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Corti R, Wijns W, Morice MC, di Mario C, Davies S, van Geuns RJ, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Juni P. Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1163-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61244-1. Epub 2008 Aug 31.

    PMID: 18765162BACKGROUND
  • Pasterkamp G, Falk E, Woutman H, Borst C. Techniques characterizing the coronary atherosclerotic plaque: influence on clinical decision making? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jul;36(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00677-x.

    PMID: 10898406BACKGROUND
  • Chau AH, Chan RC, Shishkov M, MacNeill B, Iftimia N, Tearney GJ, Kamm RD, Bouma BE, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR. Mechanical analysis of atherosclerotic plaques based on optical coherence tomography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Nov;32(11):1494-503. doi: 10.1114/b:abme.0000049034.75368.4a.

    PMID: 15636110BACKGROUND
  • Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, Laule M, Dubel HP, Schlattmann P, Knebel F, Rutsch W, Hamm B. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009 Sep 8;120(10):867-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280. Epub 2009 Aug 24.

    PMID: 19704093BACKGROUND
  • Manfrini O, Slucca M, Bugiardini R. [Optical coherence tomography]. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2007 Jan;8(1):28-33. Italian.

  • Andreini D,Pontone G,Mushtaq S,et a1.Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis.Am J Cardiol,2010,105:645.

    RESULT

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Xuzhou Central Hospital

    Southeast University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Feng chunguang, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2014

First Posted

August 19, 2014

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

August 19, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-08

Locations