The Comparative Study of OCT,Gemstone CT and 320-detector Row Spiral CT for Evaluating Restenosis of Coronary Artery Stent
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In-stent restenosis is a major reason of coronary heart disease recurrence .Even in drug eluting stent(DES), Restenosis rate could be up to 10% in diabetes and complex lesions though it was about 3-5% in general. It is particularly important that in-stent restenosis after implantation was early diagnosed and detected. The evaluation of OCT imaging is more accurate for narrow area calculation, more clear for narrow organization structure and more specific for detecting tissue types.It is currently the best way for restenosis histologic diagnosis.But it has many weakness such as the higher cost,an invasive test, expensive instrument, relatively complicated to operate,and etc.In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of stent restenosis. The improvement of spatial resolution of Gemstone CT can effectively improve the imaging quality and the measurement's accuracy of coronary artery stents.The diagnostic value of in-stent restenosis of Gemstone CT is higher than of the 320-detector row spiral CT. To a certain extent, the gemstone CT can replace OCT for examining the in-stent restenosis. This study will examine the degree of in-stent restenosis by the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT and compare the two ways on the basis of the result of OCT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 10, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedAugust 19, 2014
August 1, 2014
2.5 years
August 10, 2014
August 18, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Accuracy of detection of in-stent restenosis with the gemstone CT as compared to the 320-detector row spiral CT will be investigated
Masked examiners (CT specialists) will evaluate and compare the degree of in-stent restenosis of the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT images for the presence and features of in-stent restenosis. In this study, OCT image was regard as the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.
On the day in which a patient receives the gemstone CT and the 320-detector row spiral CT, estimated to take 10 mins
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Radiation burden of the the gemstone CT or the 320-detector row spiral CT and OCT
one month
Other Outcomes (1)
Measurement of the physical characteristics of in-stent restenosis structures seen on OCT
On the day in which a patient receives the check of OCT
Study Arms (2)
Gemstone CT
EXPERIMENTALGemstone CT :Discovery CT750 HD(high definition) ,GE(General Electric Co.) Healthcare, Milwaukee; CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient
320-detector row spiral CT
ACTIVE COMPARATOR320-detector row spiral CT:Aquilion One, Toshiba, Nasu, Japan. CT image for patient with suspected in-stent restenosis which Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient .
Interventions
Gemstone CT or 320-detector row spiral CT was assigned randomly to patient who was suspected in-stent restenosis.About after 10 days,they would accept the check of OCT which wold be the "gold standard" of in-stent restenosis.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 20-80, All genders
- Unlimited time of implantation of coronary artery stents
- Myocardial ischemia symptoms such as Chest tightness and/or chest pain in patients after stent implantation
- No clinical symptoms, but myocardial ischemia suggested by other noninvasive tests
- Routine re-testing 9-12 months after stent implantation.
You may not qualify if:
- Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine \> 120 umol/L)
- Allergy of contrast
- Severe heart failure
- Uncontrollable heart rate or contraindication of taking metoprolol
- Unstable condition
- the ventricular rate beyond 70 beats / min and irregular rhythm after adjusting.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xuzhou Central Hospital
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221000, China
Related Publications (7)
Colombo A, Latib A. [Treatment of drug-eluting stent restenosis with another drug-eluting stent: do not fail the second time!]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1120-2. No abstract available. Spanish.
PMID: 19000485BACKGROUNDWindecker S, Serruys PW, Wandel S, Buszman P, Trznadel S, Linke A, Lenk K, Ischinger T, Klauss V, Eberli F, Corti R, Wijns W, Morice MC, di Mario C, Davies S, van Geuns RJ, Eerdmans P, van Es GA, Meier B, Juni P. Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2008 Sep 27;372(9644):1163-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61244-1. Epub 2008 Aug 31.
PMID: 18765162BACKGROUNDPasterkamp G, Falk E, Woutman H, Borst C. Techniques characterizing the coronary atherosclerotic plaque: influence on clinical decision making? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jul;36(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00677-x.
PMID: 10898406BACKGROUNDChau AH, Chan RC, Shishkov M, MacNeill B, Iftimia N, Tearney GJ, Kamm RD, Bouma BE, Kaazempur-Mofrad MR. Mechanical analysis of atherosclerotic plaques based on optical coherence tomography. Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Nov;32(11):1494-503. doi: 10.1114/b:abme.0000049034.75368.4a.
PMID: 15636110BACKGROUNDDewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F, Laule M, Dubel HP, Schlattmann P, Knebel F, Rutsch W, Hamm B. Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation. 2009 Sep 8;120(10):867-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.859280. Epub 2009 Aug 24.
PMID: 19704093BACKGROUNDManfrini O, Slucca M, Bugiardini R. [Optical coherence tomography]. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2007 Jan;8(1):28-33. Italian.
PMID: 17354629RESULTAndreini D,Pontone G,Mushtaq S,et a1.Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis.Am J Cardiol,2010,105:645.
RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Institute of Cardiovascular Disease Xuzhou Central Hospital
Southeast University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 10, 2014
First Posted
August 19, 2014
Study Start
June 1, 2014
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 19, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-08