The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Drug-coated Balloon
1 other identifier
observational
2,487
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) angioplasty is similar to plain old balloon angioplasty procedurally, but there is an anti-proliferative medication paclitaxel coated on the balloon. Treating in-stent restenosis (ISR) with the DCB has the theoretical advantage of avoiding multiple stent layers and respecting the vessel anatomy. DCB has shown promising results for the treatment of ISR. Currently, DCB has a Class I indication to treat ISR recommended by European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. In addition, some interventional cardiologist has also applied DCB in de novo lesions in their clinical practice. Although some small sample size RCTs and observational studies have suggested that the clinical prognosis of DCB in primary large vessels is non-inferior to drug-eluting stent (DES), there is no large-scale RCT or cohort studies to compare the clinical effects of DCB and DES. Despite several theoretical benefits of DCB, the procedural-related complications cannot be entirely prevented, such as acute elastic retraction and severe dissection, which would affect coronary blood flow or lead to acute vascular occlusion. Some studies have suggested that optimization of the procedural technique can reduce the occurrence of complications and target lesion failure in the long-term. Proposed criteria include adapting cutting or scoring balloon for pre-dilatation, residual stenosis\<30% post-DCB, maintaining TIMI flow=3, DCB dilation time\<60s, and appropriate balloon to vessel ratio\> 0.91. However, such proposed technique and criteria have not been evaluated in the real-world clinical practice. This current study is designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of DCB in the real world and exploring the optimal procedural configurations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Dec 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 24, 2021
CompletedFebruary 12, 2026
February 1, 2026
5 years
November 22, 2021
February 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE)
DoCE is a composite clinical endpoint of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infraction (TV-MI), and Clinically individual target lesion revascularization (CI-TLR)
24 months
Other Outcomes (15)
Device-oriented Composite Endpoint (DoCE)
1 month, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
POCE
1 month, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
All-cause death
1 month, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 10 years
- +12 more other outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
All patients who received PCI with one or more drug-coated balloons (DCB) in the Xijing hospital of the Air Force Medical University from December 1, 2015 to December 1, 2019.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who received PCI with one or more drug-coated balloons (DCB)
- Patients who did not received drug-eluting stent implantation
You may not qualify if:
- \. Currently participating in another trial or participants unable to comply to follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xijing Hospitallead
Study Sites (1)
Ling Tao
Xi'an, Shannxi, 710032, China
Related Publications (1)
He X, Liu Y, Yin Z, Li F, van Geuns RJ, Garg S, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, Gao C, Tao L. Mid-term outcomes of paclitaxel-coated balloon for de novo non-small coronary lesions: a pooled analysis. BMC Med. 2025 Oct 31;23(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04429-9.
PMID: 41174582DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ling Tao, MD, Ph.D.
Xijing Hospital
- STUDY CHAIR
Chao Gao, MD, Ph.D.
Xijing Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 2 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor in Cardiology, Director of the department of Cardiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 22, 2021
First Posted
November 24, 2021
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 1, 2020
Study Completion
December 1, 2020
Last Updated
February 12, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share