NCT04119986

Brief Summary

In 1970, the first percutaneous balloon coronary angioplasty opened a new chapter of interventional therapy. However, the incidence of intracoronary restenosis was about 30%. Subsequently, bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to 5%-10% and it was still a bottleneck treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Currently, ISR is mainly treated by balloon angioplasty, stent implantation and coronary artery bypass grafting. In 2014, the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommended that drug balloon therapy (DCB) and new generation DES should be the preferred strategies for ISR treatment. Compared with DES, DCB treatment can avoid the inflammation of intima caused by multi-layer stent strut, and reduce the risk of intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis in stent. However, DCB lacks sustained radial support. Even if the residual stenosis is less than 30% after sufficient pre-dilation, the elastic retraction of the intima still exists. In addition, the antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel is significantly worse than that of sirolimus and its derivatives, and there is a lack of long-term sustained release of anti-proliferative drugs. Compared with DCB, DES can obtain long-term stable radial support and long-term anti-proliferation effect, but stent struts exposed in the vascular lumen are at risk of stent thrombosis. The new generation of DES improves the design of stent platform, improves the polymer coating, and applies new anti-proliferative drugs. It effectively reduces the inflammation of vascular wall, speeds up the process of vascular re-endothelialization, promotes early vascular repair, and significantly reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis. Recent BIOLUXRCT, RESTORE and DARE studies provide more powerful evidence for the treatment of ISR by new generation DES. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is the second generation FFR detectional method based on coronary contrast image. The latest FAVOR II results also confirm that QFR is more sensitive and specific than quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis. However, there is no report of ISR treated with DCB under the guidance of QFR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
31mo left

Started Jan 2026

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Jan 2026Dec 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 7, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 9, 2019

Completed
6.2 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2026

Completed
2.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.9 years

First QC Date

October 7, 2019

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Quantitative flow ratiodrug coated balloonDrug eluted stentIn-stent restenosis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The incidence rate of late lumen loss after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ISR

    The incidence rate of late lumen loss between DCB treated group and DES treated group evaluated by quantitative coronary analysis in patients with ISR

    Follow-up coronary angiography at 12 months after the procedure

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events

    Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the operation

Study Arms (2)

drug coated balloon

EXPERIMENTAL

A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug coated balloon treated group after randomization schedule.

Device: drug coated balloon

drug eluted stent implantation

OTHER

A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug eluted stent treated group after randomization schedule.

Device: drug eluted stent

Interventions

Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for \>30 seconds.

drug coated balloon

with regular techniques

drug eluted stent implantation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • ● Meet the diagnostic criteria for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and QFR\<0.8 of target lesion in the coronary stent

You may not qualify if:

  • QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of ISR
  • Severe congestive heart failure \[LVEF \<30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)\]
  • Severe valvular heart disease
  • Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up
  • Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
  • Known intolerance or allergy to heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel, iopromide, rapamycin, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, Co-Cr alloy or platinum-chromium alloy
  • Leukopenia or thrombopenia
  • A history of peptic ulcer or GI bleeding in the previously
  • Stroke within 6 months prior to the operation
  • A history of severe hepatic or renal failure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Nanjing First Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Sousa Uva M, Achenbach S, Pepper J, Anyanwu A, Badimon L, Bauersachs J, Baumbach A, Beygui F, Bonaros N, De Carlo M, Deaton C, Dobrev D, Dunning J, Eeckhout E, Gielen S, Hasdai D, Kirchhof P, Luckraz H, Mahrholdt H, Montalescot G, Paparella D, Rastan AJ, Sanmartin M, Sergeant P, Silber S, Tamargo J, ten Berg J, Thiele H, van Geuns RJ, Wagner HO, Wassmann S, Wendler O, Zamorano JL; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25173601BACKGROUND
  • Wong YTA, Kang DY, Lee JB, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Shin ES, Her SH, Nam CW, Chung WY, Kim MH, Lee CH, Lee PH, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

    PMID: 29447782BACKGROUND
  • Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    PMID: 29101020BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coronary Disease

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Fei Ye, MD

    Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 7, 2019

First Posted

October 9, 2019

Study Start

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations