Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for de Novo Lesions Under the Guidance of QFR in CHD Patients (UNIQUE-DCB-I Study )
Safety and Efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon Therapy for de Novo Lesions in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-I Study )
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since Gruntzig successfully performed percutaneous coronary balloon angioplasty in 1977, percutaneous coronary intervention has developed rapidly. From bare metal stents to drug-eluting stents (DES), the symptoms and prognosis of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) have been greatly improved. Although DES has reduced the probability of in-stent restenosis (ISR) and thrombosis compared with BMS since its clinical application, it can not completely solve this problem. Even if the new generation of DES requires revascularization, the incidence of ISR is still as high as 5%-10%. DES treatment is associated with delayed endothelial healing, late acquired poor stent adherence and new atherosclerosis, which lead to late ISR and thrombosis. In addition, DES is still not ideal for the treatment of small vessel disease, diffuse long lesion and bifurcation lesion. Therefore, drug coated balloon (DCB) has attracted people's attention. Balloon-loaded antiproliferative drugs can fully release the drugs to the vascular wall during balloon dilation, which can inhibit the restenosis process from the beginning of injury, and show good efficacy and safety in some specific lesions. Many clinical studies have shown that DCB has good efficacy and safety in some specific lesions (ISR, small vessel disease, bifurcation disease, in situ lesion). Especially in the treatment of ISR, researchers believe that its efficacy is not inferior to DES, and it has the advantage of non-metal residues. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is the second generation FFR detection method based on angiographic images. The diagnostic accuracy of QFR 0.80 for myocardial ischemic stenosis was 92.7%. Compared with QCA, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of QFR were also significantly better than those of QCA. The latest FAVOR II results also confirm that QFR is more sensitive and specific in diagnosing myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis than QCA, and confirm the feasibility of using QFR online in catheter lab to evaluate the functional significance of coronary artery critical lesions. However, there is no report on the treatment of de novo lesions in patients with coronary heart disease by DCB under the guidance of QFR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug balloon therapy for de novo lesions in patients with CHD under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2028
May 31, 2025
May 1, 2025
2.9 years
September 23, 2019
May 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence rate of late lumen loss after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with CHD
The incidence rate of late lumen loss between DCB treated group and DES treated group evaluated by quantitative coronary analysis in patients with CHD
Follow-up coronary angiography at 12 months after the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The incidence rate of device-related ischemic events
Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the procedure
The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events
Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the operation
Study Arms (2)
drug coated balloon
EXPERIMENTALA total of 110 patients are assigned to drug coated balloon treated group after randomization schedule.
drug eluted stent implantation
NO INTERVENTIONA total of 110 patients are assigned to drug eluted stent treated group after randomization schedule.
Interventions
Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for \>30 seconds
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ●Meet the diagnostic criteria for stable angina pectoris, unstable angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction and QFR\<0.8 of target lesion
You may not qualify if:
- QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of coronary artery lesions
- Severe congestive heart failure \[LVEF \<30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)\]
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up
- Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
- Known intolerance or allergy to heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel, iopromide, rapamycin, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, Co-Cr alloy or platinum-chromium alloy
- Leukopenia or thrombopenia
- A history of peptic ulcer or GI bleeding in the previously
- Stroke within 6 months prior to the operation
- A history of severe hepatic or renal failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nanjing First Hospital
Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China
Related Publications (4)
de la Torre Hernandez JM, Garcia Camarero T, Lozano Ruiz-Poveda F, Urbano-Carrillo CA, Sanchez Perez I, Cano-Garcia M, Saez R, Andres Morist A, Molina E, Pinar E, Torres A, Lezcano EJ, Gutierrez H, Arnold RJ, Zueco J. Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Drug-Coated Balloon ESSENTIAL for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Apr;21(4):508-513. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.021. Epub 2019 Jul 23.
PMID: 31401071BACKGROUNDRissanen TT, Uskela S, Eranen J, Mantyla P, Olli A, Romppanen H, Siljander A, Pietila M, Minkkinen MJ, Tervo J, Karkkainen JM; DEBUT trial investigators. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):230-239. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31126-2. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
PMID: 31204115BACKGROUNDBech GJ, Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels KH, Michels HR, Bonnier HJ, Koolen JJ. Usefulness of fractional flow reserve to predict clinical outcome after balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1999 Feb 23;99(7):883-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.7.883.
PMID: 10027810BACKGROUNDXu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
PMID: 29101020BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Fei Ye, MD
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2019
First Posted
September 26, 2019
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Last Updated
May 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05