NCT05874895

Brief Summary

Antimicrobial and supportive therapeutic interventions in patients with septic shock are usually effective - procalcitonin and interleukin-6 levels fall rapidly in most cases, and noradrenaline support can be discontinued within a few days. Unfortunately, only in a small portion of patients, do the organ functions improve at the same time, and in most of them, multi-organ failure persists. Therefore, it is likely that, in addition to infection and the response to infection, other mechanisms are also involved in the persistence of organ failure in patients after septic shock.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 11, 2023

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

May 11, 2023

Last Update Submit

December 4, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

SepsisMultiorgan FailureExcessive Inflammatory ResponseManual Lymphatic DrainageLymphatic SystemSeptic Shock

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Feasibility Outcome - number of patients undergoing manual lymphatic drainage procedure.

    The anticipated number of patients is 2 per month.

    12 months

  • Feasibility Outcome - The percentage of patients suitable for manual lymphatic drainage procedure in whom this procedure has been performed.

    It is expected that manual lymphatic drainage procedure will be performed in at least 80 per cent of patients.

    12 months

  • Safety Outcome - the percentage of cases when the manual lymphatic drainage procedure interferes with standard nursing care

    interference is assumed in 0 per cent of cases

    12 months

  • Safety Outcome - incidence of the need to restart circulatory support with norepinephrine

    The presumed incidence is assumed in 0 per cent of cases

    12 months

  • Safety Outcome - incidence of thromboembolic events

    The presumed incidence is assumed in 0 per cent of cases

    12 months

  • Efficacy Outcome - change in SOFA (sequential organ failure assessment) score

    Comparison of the SOFA score on Days 3 and 5 versus Day 0 (randomisation day)

    12 months

  • Efficacy Outcome - incidence of delirium

    Incidence of delirium for the period from randomisation until discharge from ICU

    12 months

  • Efficacy Outcome - 28-day mortality

    28-day mortality will be observed

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Manual Lymphatic Drainage

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to usual care, daily manual lymphatic drainage will be performed for five consecutive days. After this period.

Procedure: Manual Lymphatic Drainage

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Usual care for patients with septic shock will be provided.

Procedure: Usual Care

Interventions

Manual lymphatic drainage massage involves gently manipulating specific areas of the body to help lymph move to an area with working lymph vessels.

Manual Lymphatic Drainage
Usual CarePROCEDURE

Usual care provided for patients in septic shock.

Usual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • diagnosis of septic shock at admission to ICU
  • sepsis or suspicion of sepsis
  • noradrenaline support required in order to maintain mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg
  • serum lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L

You may not qualify if:

  • patients \<18 years of age
  • pregnant women with septic shock, in whom the pregnancy has been preserved
  • patients with a history of heart failure with NYHA (New York Heart Association) classification ≥ III
  • patients with a history of thromboembolic events
  • patients with septic shock transferred from another department/hospital, if the length of stay at the previous workplace exceeded 72 hours
  • patients with septic shock and an inauspicious prognosis, or in the phase of withdrawal of treatment
  • patients with uncontrolled infection
  • patients with septic shock who lack informed consent
  • patients with septic shock, in whom the SOFA score decreased by more than 50% during the day following the withdrawal of noradrenaline (i.e. a subgroup of patients with a rapid improvement of the clinical course after the resolution of septic shock).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Ostrava

Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 708 52, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Alitalo K. The lymphatic vasculature in disease. Nat Med. 2011 Nov 7;17(11):1371-80. doi: 10.1038/nm.2545.

    PMID: 22064427BACKGROUND
  • Venero Galanternik M, Stratman AN, Jung HM, Butler MG, Weinstein BM. Building the drains: the lymphatic vasculature in health and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016 Nov;5(6):689-710. doi: 10.1002/wdev.246. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

    PMID: 27576003BACKGROUND
  • Oliver G, Kipnis J, Randolph GJ, Harvey NL. The Lymphatic Vasculature in the 21st Century: Novel Functional Roles in Homeostasis and Disease. Cell. 2020 Jul 23;182(2):270-296. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.039.

    PMID: 32707093BACKGROUND
  • Vairo GL, Miller SJ, McBrier NM, Buckley WE. Systematic review of efficacy for manual lymphatic drainage techniques in sports medicine and rehabilitation: an evidence-based practice approach. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):e80-9. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.80E.

    PMID: 20046617BACKGROUND
  • Scallan JP, Zawieja SD, Castorena-Gonzalez JA, Davis MJ. Lymphatic pumping: mechanics, mechanisms and malfunction. J Physiol. 2016 Oct 15;594(20):5749-5768. doi: 10.1113/JP272088. Epub 2016 Aug 2.

    PMID: 27219461BACKGROUND
  • Klaourakis K, Vieira JM, Riley PR. The evolving cardiac lymphatic vasculature in development, repair and regeneration. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 May;18(5):368-379. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-00489-x. Epub 2021 Jan 18.

    PMID: 33462421BACKGROUND
  • Pruitt LG. Lymphatic flow modulation as adjunct therapy for septic shock. Med Hypotheses. 2020 Sep;142:109748. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2020.109748. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

    PMID: 32339860BACKGROUND
  • Vieira JM, Norman S, Villa Del Campo C, Cahill TJ, Barnette DN, Gunadasa-Rohling M, Johnson LA, Greaves DR, Carr CA, Jackson DG, Riley PR. The cardiac lymphatic system stimulates resolution of inflammation following myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest. 2018 Aug 1;128(8):3402-3412. doi: 10.1172/JCI97192. Epub 2018 Jul 9.

    PMID: 29985167BACKGROUND
  • Frohlich E. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Focus on Viral Origin and Role of Pulmonary Lymphatics. Biomedicines. 2021 Nov 20;9(11):1732. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111732.

    PMID: 34829961BACKGROUND
  • Schwager S, Detmar M. Inflammation and Lymphatic Function. Front Immunol. 2019 Feb 26;10:308. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00308. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 30863410BACKGROUND
  • Kraft JD, Blomgran R, Lundgaard I, Quiding-Jarbrink M, Bromberg JS, Borgeson E. Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators and the Lymphatic System. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Mar 9;22(5):2750. doi: 10.3390/ijms22052750.

    PMID: 33803130BACKGROUND
  • Fanous MY, Phillips AJ, Windsor JA. Mesenteric lymph: the bridge to future management of critical illness. JOP. 2007 Jul 9;8(4):374-99.

    PMID: 17625290BACKGROUND
  • Wu C, Li H, Zhang P, Tian C, Luo J, Zhang W, Bhandari S, Jin S, Hao Y. Lymphatic Flow: A Potential Target in Sepsis-Associated Acute Lung Injury. J Inflamm Res. 2020 Nov 23;13:961-968. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S284090. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 33262632BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisMultiple Organ FailureShock, Septic

Interventions

Manual Lymphatic Drainage

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShock

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MassageTherapy, Soft TissueMusculoskeletal ManipulationsComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsDrainagePhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation

Study Officials

  • Roman Kula, MD,CSc

    University Hospital Ostrava

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No masking will be used in this study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study subjects will be randomized in two study arms.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2023

First Posted

May 25, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

May 31, 2024

Study Completion

November 28, 2025

Last Updated

December 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Locations