NCT04227652

Brief Summary

The benefits of fever treatment in critically ill patients remains unclear. The aim of the prospective, randomized clinical trial was to verify the hypothesis that the administration of ibuprofen in order to decrease the fever in septic patients without limited cardiorespiratory reserve leads to decreasing their prognosis.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
140

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 3, 2013

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 28, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2019

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 10, 2020

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 13, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

January 14, 2020

Status Verified

January 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

January 10, 2020

Last Update Submit

January 11, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

sepsissevere sepsisseptic shockfeveribuprofenphysiological reserves

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • SOFA score value

    The SOFA score (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) was measured on Day 3 and Day 7

    up to 7 days

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Serum interleukin-6 level

    up to 7 days

  • Serum procalcitonine level

    up to 7 days

  • Serum lactate level

    up to 7 days

  • Central venous oxygen saturation

    up to 7 days

  • Duration of artificial ventilation

    1 month

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Aggressive treatment strategy

EXPERIMENTAL

The antipyretic strategy was initiated immediately upon increase of the temperature above 38.3°C. The antipyretic strategy consisted of administration of ibuprofen (per-orally or into the nasogastric tube, or rectal administration in the form of a suppository) in therapeutical dose, alway supplemented with physical cooling in cases when the temperature exceeded 39.5°C. The body temperature was measured in the urinary bladder.

Drug: Ibuprofen administration

Conservative treatment strategy

EXPERIMENTAL

The antipyretic strategy was initiated only after the body temperature exceeded 39.5°C. The antipyretic strategy consisted of administration of ibuprofen (per-orally or into the nasogastric tube, or rectal administration in the form of a suppository) in therapeutical dose, alway supplemented with physical cooling in cases when the temperature exceeded 39.5°C. The body temperature was measured in the urinary bladder.

Drug: Ibuprofen administration

Interventions

Administration of ibuprofen, according to treatment recommendations - per orally, into the nasogastric tube, or in the form of a suppository

Aggressive treatment strategyConservative treatment strategy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • age \>18 years of age
  • body temperature \>38.3°C within 2 consecutive hours
  • anti-microbial therapy for a known or suspected infection

You may not qualify if:

  • patients admitted after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)
  • acute myocardial infarction
  • brain injury (traumatic and non-traumatic)
  • transfer from another ICU after 72 hours
  • pregnancy
  • antipyretic medication prior to randomization
  • non-obtaining the informed consent
  • moribund condition
  • high risk of hemodynamic or respiratory maladaptation on the metabolic effect of fever

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Ostrava

Ostrava, Moravian-Silesian Region, 70852, Czechia

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Schulman CI, Namias N, Doherty J, Manning RJ, Li P, Elhaddad A, Lasko D, Amortegui J, Dy CJ, Dlugasch L, Baracco G, Cohn SM. The effect of antipyretic therapy upon outcomes in critically ill patients: a randomized, prospective study. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2005 Winter;6(4):369-75. doi: 10.1089/sur.2005.6.369.

    PMID: 16433601BACKGROUND
  • Young P, Saxena M, Bellomo R, Freebairn R, Hammond N, van Haren F, Holliday M, Henderson S, Mackle D, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Weatherall M, Webb S, Beasley R; HEAT Investigators; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Acetaminophen for Fever in Critically Ill Patients with Suspected Infection. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 3;373(23):2215-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1508375. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

    PMID: 26436473BACKGROUND
  • Ye S, Xu D, Zhang C, Li M, Zhang Y. Effect of Antipyretic Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis Receiving Mechanical Ventilation Treatment. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:3087505. doi: 10.1155/2017/3087505. Epub 2017 Mar 12.

    PMID: 28386165BACKGROUND
  • Bernard GR, Wheeler AP, Russell JA, Schein R, Summer WR, Steinberg KP, Fulkerson WJ, Wright PE, Christman BW, Dupont WD, Higgins SB, Swindell BB. The effects of ibuprofen on the physiology and survival of patients with sepsis. The Ibuprofen in Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 27;336(13):912-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703273361303.

    PMID: 9070471BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticFever

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShockBody Temperature ChangesSigns and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Roman Kula, MD,CSc.

    University Hospital Ostrava

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
No masking was used in the study
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study subjects were enrolled in two parallel groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2020

First Posted

January 13, 2020

Study Start

September 3, 2013

Primary Completion

February 28, 2019

Study Completion

March 31, 2019

Last Updated

January 14, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

There exists no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Locations