NCT04571801

Brief Summary

Sepsis is triggered by an infection and represents one of the greatest challenges of modern intensive care medicine. With regard to a targeted antimicrobial treatment strategy, the earliest possible pathogen detection is of crucial importance. Until now, culture-based detection methods represent the diagnostic gold standard, although they are characterized by numerous limitations. Culture-independent molecular diagnostic procedures may represent a promising alternative. In particular, the concept of plasmatic detection of circulating, free DNA employing next-generation sequencing (NGS) has shown to be suitable for the detection of disease-causing pathogens in patients with bloodstream infections. The DigiSep-Trial is a randomized, controlled, interventional, multicenter trial to characterize the effect of the combination of NGS-based digital precision diagnostics, standard-of-care microbiological analyses and optional expert exchanges compared to solely standard-of-care microbiological analyses in the clinical picture of sepsis / septic shock. The study examines in 410 patients (n = 205 per arm) with sepsis / septic shock whether the so-called DOOR-RADAR (Desirability of Outcome Ranking / Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk) score (representing a combined endpoint including the criteria (1) inpatient admission time, (2) consumption of antibiotics, (3) mortality and (4) acute renal failure (ARF)) can be significantly improved, by application of an additional NGS-based diagnostic concept. We also aim to investigate whether the new diagnostic procedure is cost-effective. It is postulated that the inpatient admission time, mortality rate, incidence of ARF, the duration of antimicrobial therapy as well as the costs of complications and outpatient aftercare can be reduced. Moreover, a significant improvement in the quality of life (QoL) of the affected patients can be expected. Extensive preparatory work suggests that NGS-based diagnostics have higher specificity and sensitivity compared to standard-of-care microbiological analyses for detecting bloodstream infections. This preliminary work for the DigiSep-Trial with the help of an interventional study design provides the optimal basis to establish this new concept as part of the national standard based on the best possible evidence.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
410

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

22 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 21, 2020

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2020

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 16, 2022

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 28, 2024

Completed
26 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 24, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

September 21, 2020

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

SepsisBacteremiaBlood cultureNext generation sequencingDigital precision diagnosticsDesirability of outcome ranking / response adjusted for duration of antibiotic risk (DOOR/RADAR) score

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Desirability of Outcome Ranking / Response Adjusted for Duration of Antibiotic Risk-Score

    DOOR/RADAR-score \[points\], (min. 1, max. 5), a lower score indicates a better outcome

    28 days

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Disease severity

    at 90 and 180 days

  • Disease severity

    at 28, 90, and 180 days

  • Degree of organ dysfunction/-failure

    at 28, 90, and 180 days

  • Degree of organ dysfunction/-failure

    during 28 days

  • Degree of organ dysfunction/-failure

    at 28, 90, and 180 days

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard diagnostics

Diagnostic Test: Standard diagnostics

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Standard diagnostics + NGS

Diagnostic Test: Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)

Interventions

Standard diagnosticsDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Standard diagnostics (Microbial diagnostics by means of standard culture methods + optional consultation of experts in the field of infectious diseases) within the first 72 h after diagnosis of sepsis / septic shock

1

Standard diagnostics + NGS (Microbial diagnostics using standard culture methods + Next Generation Sequencing + optional consultation of experts in the field of infectious diseases) within the first 72 h after diagnosis of sepsis / septic shock

2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All patients who develop sepsis or septic shock within \< 24 h in accordance with the new sepsis definition (Sepsis-3) in the above-mentioned participating centers and consent to participation in the study will be included.
  • Written consent by the study participant or a legally appointed representative
  • Age \>18 years
  • Sepsis:
  • Life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated immune response on the basis of a suspected or proven infection
  • Detection of organ dysfunction indicated by SOFA score of ≥ 2 points Alternative:
  • Change of the quick (q) SOFA score of 2 points as an indication of a sepsis
  • Or septic shock:
  • Persistent hypotension despite adequate volume substitution, which necessitates the use of vasopressors, to maintain an arterial medium pressure of \> 65 mmHg
  • Serum lactate \> 2 mmol/l (18 mg/dl)

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Refusal to participate in the study
  • Palliative therapy approach
  • Patients who have already been included in the study but require re-admission to the intensive care unit cannot be included a second

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (22)

University Hospital Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

Heidenheim Hospital

Heidenheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

Konstanz Hospital

Konstanz, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

University Hospital Tübingen

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

University Hospital Ulm

Ulm, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Location

University Hospital TU München

München, Bavaria, Germany

Location

University Hospital Regensburg

Regensburg, Bavaria, Germany

Location

University Hospital Würzburg

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Location

Klinik Evangelisches Krankenhaus Luckau gGmbH

Luckau, Brandenburg, Germany

Location

University Hospital Frankfurt

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Location

Helios Dr. Horst Schmidt Hospital

Wiesbaden, Hesse, Germany

Location

University Hospital Göttingen

Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany

Location

University Hospital Hannover (MHH)

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Location

University Hospital Rostock

Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Location

University Hospital Aachen

Aachen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

Klinik Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bethel gGmbH Bielefeld

Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

University Hospital Bonn

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

University Hospital Köln

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

University Hospital Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

University Hospital Essen

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Location

University Hospital Leipzig

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Location

University Hospital Charité

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Brenner T, Skarabis A, Stevens P, Axnick J, Haug P, Grumaz S, Bruckner T, Luntz S, Witzke O, Pletz MW, Ruprecht TM, Marschall U, Altin S, Greiner W, Berger MM; TIFOnet Critical Care Trials Group. Optimization of sepsis therapy based on patient-specific digital precision diagnostics using next generation sequencing (DigiSep-Trial)-study protocol for a randomized, controlled, interventional, open-label, multicenter trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 18;22(1):714. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05667-x.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisShock, SepticBacteremia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsShockBacterial InfectionsBacterial Infections and Mycoses

Study Officials

  • Thorsten Brenner, MD

    Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Essen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Arm 1: Standard diagnostics (Microbial diagnostics by means of standard culture methods + optional consultation of experts in the field of infectious diseases) within the first 72 h after diagnosis Arm 2: Standard diagnostics + NGS (Microbial diagnostics using standard culture methods + Next Generation Sequencing + optional consultation of experts in the field of infectious diseases) within the first 72 h after diagnosis
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 21, 2020

First Posted

October 1, 2020

Study Start

March 16, 2022

Primary Completion

March 28, 2024

Study Completion

April 23, 2024

Last Updated

August 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Researchers with access to data are limited to the project partners involved. Researchers will receive pseudonymized data sets for data evaluations. A prerequisite for the transfer of the data to the project partners is the written consent of the patients.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR

Locations