NCT05852067

Brief Summary

Numerous studies have confirmed the analgesic effect of M1-rTMS on both induced pain and various chronic pains and subsequently found that pcTBS is more time-efficient and can produce the same or even stronger analgesic effect, however, its study in pathological pain h has not been thoroughly investigated. Due to the dynamic nature of the injury sensory system, pain also exhibits a dynamic process, but there is a lack of specific methods or biomarkers to document this process. Surface electromyography (EMG) is a common technique used in rTMS studies to reflect changes in cortical excitability. In turn, both pain and rTMS interventions can cause changes and thus can be used as a potential biomarker to predict pain onset and progression. In addition, the number of sessions of rTMS treatment is an important factor influencing the analgesic effect of rTMS. In summary, this study intends to explore the best pain predictor by using a capsaicin-induced pain model in healthy volunteers, monitor the dynamic changes of cortical excitability index and VAS score before and after pcTBS intervention, and also verify the relationship between the number of pcTBS treatments and analgesic effect, to provide a new strategy for the prevention and treatment of neuropathic pain.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
25

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 2, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

May 2, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change of pain intensity

    pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at baseline and posttreatment of pcTBS stimulation

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Motor-evoked potential (MEP)

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • Cortical silent period (CSP)

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • pain intensity after two sessions of pcTBS

    through study completion, an average of 6 months

Study Arms (2)

Active stimulation of M1

EXPERIMENTAL

pcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.

Device: pcTBS of M1

SHAM stimulation

SHAM COMPARATOR

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal

Device: SHAM stimulation

Interventions

Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline

Active stimulation of M1

The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp

SHAM stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \) 18-65 years of age; 2) physical and mental health, free of chronic pain (through interviews and McGill questionnaires); 3) Right-handed

You may not qualify if:

  • \) inability to receive TMS interventions (e.g. pacemaker); 2) mental illness or suicidal tendencies; 3) history of previous seizures/epilepsy; 4) previous craniocerebral surgery for stroke or other reasons; 5) drug/substance dependence; 6) Inability to sit upright to cooperate with assessment and treatment; 7) Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within half a year

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

Hangzhou, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • min yan, prof.

    The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

chaomin wu, doctor

CONTACT

min yan, prof.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2023

First Posted

May 10, 2023

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2023

Study Completion

July 1, 2024

Last Updated

May 10, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations