Effects of Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation on Pain and Neural Excitability
The Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School od Medicine
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Numerous studies have confirmed the analgesic effect of M1-rTMS on both induced pain and various chronic pains and subsequently found that pcTBS is more time-efficient and can produce the same or even stronger analgesic effect, however, its study in pathological pain h has not been thoroughly investigated. Due to the dynamic nature of the injury sensory system, pain also exhibits a dynamic process, but there is a lack of specific methods or biomarkers to document this process. Surface electromyography (EMG) is a common technique used in rTMS studies to reflect changes in cortical excitability. In turn, both pain and rTMS interventions can cause changes and thus can be used as a potential biomarker to predict pain onset and progression. In addition, the number of sessions of rTMS treatment is an important factor influencing the analgesic effect of rTMS. In summary, this study intends to explore the best pain predictor by using a capsaicin-induced pain model in healthy volunteers, monitor the dynamic changes of cortical excitability index and VAS score before and after pcTBS intervention, and also verify the relationship between the number of pcTBS treatments and analgesic effect, to provide a new strategy for the prevention and treatment of neuropathic pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedMay 10, 2023
April 1, 2023
8 months
May 2, 2023
May 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
change of pain intensity
pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at baseline and posttreatment of pcTBS stimulation
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Cortical silent period (CSP)
through study completion, an average of 6 months
pain intensity after two sessions of pcTBS
through study completion, an average of 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Active stimulation of M1
EXPERIMENTALpcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.
SHAM stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORThe Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal
Interventions
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline
The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \) 18-65 years of age; 2) physical and mental health, free of chronic pain (through interviews and McGill questionnaires); 3) Right-handed
You may not qualify if:
- \) inability to receive TMS interventions (e.g. pacemaker); 2) mental illness or suicidal tendencies; 3) history of previous seizures/epilepsy; 4) previous craniocerebral surgery for stroke or other reasons; 5) drug/substance dependence; 6) Inability to sit upright to cooperate with assessment and treatment; 7) Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant within half a year
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
Hangzhou, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
min yan, prof.
The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2023
First Posted
May 10, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share