Mechanism of Analgesic Effect on Prolonged Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
It has been shown that prolonged continuous theta burst stimulation (pcTBS) , a relatively new repetitive transcranial magnetic simulation (rTMS) protocol, of the primary motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) decreases pain in healthy volunteers, in various experimental models. In addition, rTMS of M1 has also been shown to have analgesic effects in various chronic pain conditions, including neuropathic pain.The mechanisms underlying rTMS-induced analgesia remain unclear. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that rTMS of M1 and DLPFC induces changes in the activity of cortical and subcortical structures involved in pain processing and modulation. Endogenous opioids and e N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor are known to play a major role in these processes. The investigator hypothesized that the endogenous opioids systems (EOS) and NMDA receptor might be involved in the analgesic action of pcTBS. In the first part,the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after naloxone or placebo treatment, the intensity of pain induced by capsaicin were used to evaluate the analgesic effects of pcTBS. If naloxone does not reverse the analgesic effect of pcTBS,The volunteers will be invited to participant the second part of the study, which the investigator compares the analgesic effects of motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation before and after Ketamine treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable chronic-pain
Started May 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable chronic-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedFebruary 16, 2023
April 1, 2022
7 months
April 19, 2022
February 14, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
pain intensity at baseline
pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at baseline.
Baseline
pain intensity at the posttreatment of pcTBS
pain intensity on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS) extending from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain possible) at the posttreatment of pcTBS.
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Motor-evoked potential (MEP)
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Cortical silent period (CSP)
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Maximum plasma concentration of opioid peptide at baseline
baseline
Maximum plasma concentration of opioid peptide at the posttreatment of pcTBS
through study completion, an average of 8 months
Study Arms (3)
active stimulation of M1
EXPERIMENTALpcTBS was administered to the left M1 at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.
active stimulation of DLPFC
EXPERIMENTALpcTBS was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% resting motor threshold (RMT), consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline.
SHAM stimulation
SHAM COMPARATORThe Sham stimulation was delivered using the same protocol, with the coil being orientated at 90° to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scal
Interventions
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of naloxone, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of placebo (saline), which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
The volunteer received an intravenous bolus followed by a continuous infusion of ketamine, which was continued throughout the pcTBS session
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left M1 at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline
Prolonged continuous theta-burst stimulation (pcTBS) was administered to the left DLPFC at 80% RMT, consisting of a burst of 3 pulses given at 50 Hz repeated every 5 Hz. A total of 1,200 pulses were delivered with the TMS coil positioned in a posterior-anterior (PA) direction parallel to the midline
The Sham stimulation was delivered using the same pcTBS protocol, with the coil being flipped 90◦to the scalp so that the magnetic field would be delivered away from the scalp
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- )woman or man over 18 and under 85 years old; 2)Clinical diagnosis of physical and mental health people; 3) able to cooperate in completing questionnaire.
You may not qualify if:
- )Clinical diagnosis of psychiatric disorder including major depression; 2) History of substance abuse (alcohol, drugs); 3) Past treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); 4) Contraindications to rTMS (previous severe head trauma or neurosurgical intervention, past or current epilepsy, active brain tumor, intracranial hypertension, implanted ferromagnetic devices, e.g., cardiac pacemaker, neurostimulator, or cochlear implants); 5) Any difficulty to fill out questionnaires (due to language or cognitive problems);
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Related Publications (1)
Liu Y, Sun J, Wu C, Ren J, He Y, Sun N, Huang H, Chen Q, Liu D, Huang Y, Xu F, Yu L, Fitzgibbon BM, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB, Yan M, Che X. Characterizing the opioidergic mechanisms of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced analgesia: a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2024 Sep 1;165(9):2035-2043. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003220. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
PMID: 38537053DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
min yan, prof
The second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang University hangzhou
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2022
First Posted
May 4, 2022
Study Start
May 14, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
February 16, 2023
Record last verified: 2022-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share