NCT05814081

Brief Summary

Introduction: Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-associated lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical Power has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it takes into account all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI formation. Volume control mode is at the forefront in the old anesthesia devices used in the operating room, and today, together with technology, there are anesthesia devices with many modes and features, as in intensive care units. This causes confusion in the use of mechanical ventilators. In this study, volume and pressure control ventilation modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics (including mechanical power) in patients operated in the supine and prone positions. Aim of study: It has been compared the effects on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPH) in terms of VILI risk by calculating mechanical power from advanced respiratory mechanics of patients ventilated in pressure and volume control modes, which are frequently used in operating room applications. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, ariscat score, and ariscat risk group values. The supine and prone mechanical power (MPrs) values of the volume control group were statistically significantly lower than the pressure control group. P values were calculated as 0.012 and 0.001, respectively. Results: Supine and prone MPrs values of the volume control group were calculated significantly lower than the pressure control group. Pressure-controlled intraoperative mechanical ventilation is considered to be disadvantageous in terms of the risk of VILI in the supine and prone position in terms of the current mechanical power concept.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2021

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 16, 2023

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 14, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

mechanical powerpronesupinepostoperative pulmonary complications

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mechanical power

    Mechanical power values calculated during surgery were compared.

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • Postoperative complications

    Postoperative pulmonary complications were observed.

    Postoperative period (up to 10 days)

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power

    During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

Pressure Control Ventilation Supine Group

20 patients were ventilated in the supine position with pressure control mode.

Procedure: Position/Ventilation

Pressure Control Ventilation Prone Group

20 patients were ventilated in the prone position with pressure control mode.

Procedure: Position/Ventilation

Volume Control Ventilation Supine Group

20 patients were ventilated in the supine position with volume control mode.

Procedure: Position/Ventilation

Volume Control Ventilation Prone Group

20 patients were ventilated in the prone position with volume control mode.

Procedure: Position/Ventilation

Interventions

Positioning and ventilation mode adjustments were made to the patients.

Pressure Control Ventilation Prone GroupPressure Control Ventilation Supine GroupVolume Control Ventilation Prone GroupVolume Control Ventilation Supine Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Cervical hernia, lumbar hernia and lumbar stabilization cases who were operated in the neurosurgery operating room of the anesthesia and reanimation clinic were examined.

You may qualify if:

  • ASA I - III risk group patients
  • Patients between the ages of 18-70
  • At least 2 hours of mechanical ventilation time

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with COPD or Asthma bronchial
  • Patients with a functional capacity of less than 7 METS
  • Pregnant and lactating female patients.
  • Patients who have had thoracic surgery before
  • Patients with BMI above 35
  • Patients who had hemodynamic instability or desaturation (SpO2\<92%) during the operation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Basaksehir Cam Sakura City Hospital

Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.

  • Cressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Massari D, Algieri I, Amini M, Cammaroto A, Brioni M, Montaruli C, Nikolla K, Guanziroli M, Dondossola D, Gatti S, Valerio V, Vergani GL, Pugni P, Cadringher P, Gagliano N, Gattinoni L. Mechanical Power and Development of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1100-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056.

  • Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

  • Tonetti T, Vasques F, Rapetti F, Maiolo G, Collino F, Romitti F, Camporota L, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Quintel M, Gattinoni L. Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):286. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.08.

  • Giosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, Bonifazi M, Macri MM, Romitti F, Vassalli F, Chiumello D, Quintel M, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Nov 27;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8.

  • Asar S, Acicbe O, Cukurova Z, Hergunsel GO, Canan E, Cakar N. Bedside dynamic calculation of mechanical power: A validation study. J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.027. Epub 2020 Jan 2.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Induced Lung InjuryPostoperative ComplicationsDeception

Interventions

Patient PositioningVentilation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSocial BehaviorBehavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesEnvironment, ControlledEnvironmentEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Furkan Tontu

    Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hospital

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
6 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Anesthesiologist, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 16, 2023

First Posted

April 14, 2023

Study Start

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion

May 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

April 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations