How To Prevent Ventilator-Related Lung Damage in Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation? Pcv or Vcv ?
1 other identifier
observational
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Introduction: Intraoperative Mechanical Ventilation practices can lead to ventilator-associated lung injury (VILI) and postoperative pulmonary complications in healthy lungs. Mechanical Power has been developed as a new concept in reducing the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications as it takes into account all respiratory mechanics that cause VILI formation. Volume control mode is at the forefront in the old anesthesia devices used in the operating room, and today, together with technology, there are anesthesia devices with many modes and features, as in intensive care units. This causes confusion in the use of mechanical ventilators. In this study, volume and pressure control ventilation modes were compared in terms of respiratory mechanics (including mechanical power) in patients operated in the supine and prone positions. Aim of study: It has been compared the effects on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPH) in terms of VILI risk by calculating mechanical power from advanced respiratory mechanics of patients ventilated in pressure and volume control modes, which are frequently used in operating room applications. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, ariscat score, and ariscat risk group values. The supine and prone mechanical power (MPrs) values of the volume control group were statistically significantly lower than the pressure control group. P values were calculated as 0.012 and 0.001, respectively. Results: Supine and prone MPrs values of the volume control group were calculated significantly lower than the pressure control group. Pressure-controlled intraoperative mechanical ventilation is considered to be disadvantageous in terms of the risk of VILI in the supine and prone position in terms of the current mechanical power concept.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2023
CompletedApril 14, 2023
April 1, 2023
4 months
March 16, 2023
April 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Mechanical power
Mechanical power values calculated during surgery were compared.
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
Postoperative complications
Postoperative pulmonary complications were observed.
Postoperative period (up to 10 days)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
Respiratory parameters other than mechanical power
During surgery (2 hours to 4 hours)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Pressure Control Ventilation Supine Group
20 patients were ventilated in the supine position with pressure control mode.
Pressure Control Ventilation Prone Group
20 patients were ventilated in the prone position with pressure control mode.
Volume Control Ventilation Supine Group
20 patients were ventilated in the supine position with volume control mode.
Volume Control Ventilation Prone Group
20 patients were ventilated in the prone position with volume control mode.
Interventions
Positioning and ventilation mode adjustments were made to the patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Cervical hernia, lumbar hernia and lumbar stabilization cases who were operated in the neurosurgery operating room of the anesthesia and reanimation clinic were examined.
You may qualify if:
- ASA I - III risk group patients
- Patients between the ages of 18-70
- At least 2 hours of mechanical ventilation time
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with COPD or Asthma bronchial
- Patients with a functional capacity of less than 7 METS
- Pregnant and lactating female patients.
- Patients who have had thoracic surgery before
- Patients with BMI above 35
- Patients who had hemodynamic instability or desaturation (SpO2\<92%) during the operation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Basaksehir Cam Sakura City Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (6)
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.
PMID: 24283226RESULTCressoni M, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Massari D, Algieri I, Amini M, Cammaroto A, Brioni M, Montaruli C, Nikolla K, Guanziroli M, Dondossola D, Gatti S, Valerio V, Vergani GL, Pugni P, Cadringher P, Gagliano N, Gattinoni L. Mechanical Power and Development of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury. Anesthesiology. 2016 May;124(5):1100-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001056.
PMID: 26872367RESULTGattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27620287RESULTTonetti T, Vasques F, Rapetti F, Maiolo G, Collino F, Romitti F, Camporota L, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Quintel M, Gattinoni L. Driving pressure and mechanical power: new targets for VILI prevention. Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):286. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.07.08.
PMID: 28828361RESULTGiosa L, Busana M, Pasticci I, Bonifazi M, Macri MM, Romitti F, Vassalli F, Chiumello D, Quintel M, Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Mechanical power at a glance: a simple surrogate for volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2019 Nov 27;7(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40635-019-0276-8.
PMID: 31773328RESULTAsar S, Acicbe O, Cukurova Z, Hergunsel GO, Canan E, Cakar N. Bedside dynamic calculation of mechanical power: A validation study. J Crit Care. 2020 Apr;56:167-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.12.027. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
PMID: 31931417RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Furkan Tontu
Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 6 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Anesthesiologist, Anesthesiology and Reanimation Department, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2023
First Posted
April 14, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
April 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-04