Comparison of Mechanical Power Calculations of Volume Control and Pressure Control Modes
1 other identifier
observational
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The management of ARDS, which is one of the important problems of intensive care patients, has gained popularity with the pandemic. Mechanical ventilation is an important life-saving treatment in ARDS patients. However, when not used correctly, it can cause Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI). Therefore, lung protective ventilation should be applied to minimize VILI in ARDS patients. Mechanical power is one of the parameters that guides intensivist in predicting VILI.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 27, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 10, 2022
CompletedAugust 10, 2022
August 1, 2022
2 years
July 21, 2022
August 9, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mechanical power values of different ventilation modes
We aimed to compare the volume control and pressure control modes over the mechanical power values.
60 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Pressure control mode group
On the 2nd day of intensive care hospitalization, while under deep sedation and in the controlled mode (VCV or PRVC) and in the supine position, the ventilator in the VCV mode was switched to PRVC mode for 60 minutes without changing any of the set ventilator settings (RR, PEEP, TV, I:E ratio).
Volume control mode group
Likewise, if it is in PRVC mode, it is also switched to VCV mode for 60 minutes. In this way, two dependent groups were formed.
Interventions
On the 2nd day of intensive care hospitalization, while under deep sedation and in the controlled mode (VCV or PRVC) and in the supine position, the ventilator in the VCV mode was switched to PRVC mode for 60 minutes without changing any of the set ventilator settings (RR, PEEP, TV, I:E ratio). Likewise, if it is in PRVC mode, it is also switched to VCV mode for 60 minutes. MP values were calculated from the minute respiratory parameters of all patients with the MP formulas defined in the software.
Eligibility Criteria
This study was conducted prospectively with 36 Covid-19 ARDS patients who were followed up in the Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit and diagnosed with ARDS according to the Berlin criteria. The definite COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed by PCR (Bio-Speedy Covid-19 RT-Qpcr detection Kit-Bioeksen, Turkey) obtained from the nasal swab sample and chest computed tomography images.
You may qualify if:
- Patients with confirmed Covid-19 diagnosis in intensive care unit (ICU) and diagnosed with ARDS according to Berlin criteria
- Intubated patients which treated in the supine position on the second day of ICU admission
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a known diagnosis of COPD
- Patients experiencing hemodynamic instability during ventilation
- Prone pozisyonda olan hastalar
- Patients receiving inotropic support
- Patients with missing data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Furkan Tontu
Intensivist
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2022
First Posted
August 10, 2022
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 27, 2021
Study Completion
January 22, 2022
Last Updated
August 10, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08