Efficacy and Safety of Automated Closed-loop Ventilator vs Conventional Open-loop Ventilator in the Emergency Department
AVAC
A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fully Automated Closed-loop Ventilator Versus Conventional Open-loop Ventilator in Ventilated Patients in the Emergency Department
2 other identifiers
interventional
132
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) may require breathing support with machines depending on the condition. Throughout the breathing support, the settings on the breathing machines will be tailored to the patient's requirements. These settings are manually adjusted by trained physicians. Currently, there are machines which can automatically change the settings based on real-time specific information obtained from the patient. This study aims to compare the use of machines which require manual adjustments (open-loop conventional ventilators) and machines which can automatically change the settings (closed-loop automated ventilators). Patients will be carefully selected to ensure no harm is caused whilst delivering the best care. This study will look into the duration when patients are receiving optimum settings and levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the blood. The outcomes of this study would allow us to identify methods to improve patient care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 5, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedDecember 5, 2023
November 1, 2023
1 year
November 16, 2023
November 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of ventilation within a predefined range of acceptable respiratory parameters
Duration of ventilation (in minutes) within predefined acceptable tidal volume (TV), plateau pressure, EtCO2 and SpO2
Every 30 seconds for 240 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Manual adjustments of ventilator settings
Any time the manual adjustment is performed throughout the 4-hour study period
Physiological data - blood pressure
Mean hourly for 4 hours
Physiological data - respiratory rate
Mean hourly for 4 hours
Physiological data - heart rate
Mean hourly for 4 hours
Biochemical data - pH
Upon intubation, at 1-hour, 2-hour, 3-hour and 4-hour
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Open-loop ventilator
ACTIVE COMPARATORPrior to the rapid sequence intubation, patients' gender and height are set on the ventilator. The physician in-charge will setup the ventilator based on the lung condition, following the research protocol. Patients will be connected to this ventilator upon securing the airway. Ventilator setting parameters will be manually adjusted by the in-charge physician following local guidelines.
Closed-loop ventilator
EXPERIMENTALPrior to the rapid sequence intubation, patients' gender and height are set on the ventilator. Patients' condition settings are selected depending on the lung condition. The sensors for end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and oxygen saturation (SpO2) will be connected. Patients will be connected to this ventilator upon securing the airway. Ventilator setting parameters will be set following the study protocol.
Interventions
Fully automated closed-loop ventilator using the INTELLIVENT software
Conventional closed-loop ventilator with manual adjustments by the physician in charge
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Decision made by treating physicians to intubate and mechanically ventilate
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected or confirmed pregnancy.
- Known right ventricular heart failure upon assessment for recruitment.
- Severe metabolic acidosis upon intubation (pH \<7.2 or bicarbonate \<12 mmol/L)
- Circulatory shock requiring noradrenaline more than 0.5 mcg/kg/min upon assessment for recruitment.
- Severe or acute life-threatening asthma.
- Patients with chest wall deformities that would affect ventilation (e.g. severe kyphoscoliosis, diaphragmatic hernia, flail chest, trauma, pectus excavatum or carinatum, ankylosing spondylitis
- Patients with previous lobectomy or pneumonectomy.
- Patients with pneumothorax or other condition that requires chest drainage tube.
- Patients with body mass index \> 40 kg/m2.
- Manufacturer's contraindications:
- Difference in oxygen saturation between pulse oximetry (SpO2) and arterial sample (SaO2) of more than 5% (due to unreliable sensor).
- Difference in carbon dioxide level between end-tidal sensor (ETCO2) and arterial sample (PaCO2) of more than 5 mm Hg (due to unreliable sensor).
- Known pneumothorax and bronchopulmonary fistula upon assessment for recruitment.
- Participation in another interventional trial.
- Do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) order.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (6)
Lellouche F, Bouchard PA, Simard S, L'Her E, Wysocki M. Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Mar;39(3):463-71. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2799-2. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23338569BACKGROUNDSavioli G, Ceresa IF, Gri N, Bavestrello Piccini G, Longhitano Y, Zanza C, Piccioni A, Esposito C, Ricevuti G, Bressan MA. Emergency Department Overcrowding: Understanding the Factors to Find Corresponding Solutions. J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):279. doi: 10.3390/jpm12020279.
PMID: 35207769BACKGROUNDAngotti LB, Richards JB, Fisher DF, Sankoff JD, Seigel TA, Al Ashry HS, Wilcox SR. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug;18(5):972-979. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.5.34099. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
PMID: 28874952BACKGROUNDArnal JM, Garnero A, Novonti D, Demory D, Ducros L, Berric A, Donati S, Corno G, Jaber S, Durand-Gasselin J. Feasibility study on full closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational comparative study. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 11;17(5):R196. doi: 10.1186/cc12890.
PMID: 24025234BACKGROUNDClavieras N, Wysocki M, Coisel Y, Galia F, Conseil M, Chanques G, Jung B, Arnal JM, Matecki S, Molinari N, Jaber S. Prospective randomized crossover study of a new closed-loop control system versus pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):631-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182952608.
PMID: 23619172BACKGROUNDChelly J, Mazerand S, Jochmans S, Weyer CM, Pourcine F, Ellrodt O, Thieulot-Rolin N, Serbource-Goguel J, Sy O, Vong LVP, Monchi M. Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING). Crit Care. 2020 Jul 22;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03155-3.
PMID: 32698860BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Khadijah Poh, MMed
University of Malaya
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant Emergency Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2023
First Posted
December 5, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
December 5, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data for this study will not be made publicly available. However, summary results and study outcomes will be transparently reported in the form of aggregated data and CSV files. This approach ensures that key findings are accessible while respecting participant confidentiality.