Simulations Impact on Nursing Students Conflict Resolution and Problem-Solving Skills
The Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Method on Developing Senior Nursing Students Managerial Conflict Resolution and Problem-Solving Skills
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Scenario-based simulation training effectively enhances nursing students' core competencies, communication, teamwork, problem-solving, and decision-making skills, better preparing them for real-world experiences. This research focuses on the impact of scenario-based simulations in developing conflict resolution and problem-solving skills in nursing management courses. By imitating real-life clinical scenarios, such training can improve students' abilities to manage conflicts and address clinical challenges, making them more effective and competent in clinical settings after graduation. The study aims to provide educators with insights and practical recommendations for incorporating innovative methods into nursing education programs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 8, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
29 days
September 4, 2024
September 10, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Conflict Action Styles Scale
The scale is five-point Likert type and consists of 35 items and 5 sub-factors. The sub-factors of the scale consist of avoidant (statements 1, 6, 11, 16, 21, 26 and 31), coercive (statements 2, 7, 12, 17, 22, 27 and 32), facilitative (statements 3, 8, 13, 18, 23, 28 and 33), conciliatory (statements 4, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29 and 34) and confrontational (statements 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 35). In which sub-dimension the highest score is obtained, that sub-dimension determines the conflict action style of the person.
four weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Problem Solving Inventory
four weeks
Study Arms (2)
conflict and problem solving scenario training (Experimental groups)
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will be taken to scenario-based simulation. The simulation application will be taken to the case suitable for the conflict resolution skills and problem solving skills of the final year students. Before the simulation, students will be informed about the scenario (prebriefing) and expectations will be shared. This stage will take approximately 10 minutes. The student will be given time to solve the conflict for 15 minutes. At the end of the scenario, the student will be taken to the debriefing session.
conflict and problem solving curriculum training (Control groups9
NO INTERVENTIONControl group students will take 8 hours of theoretical courses on Conflict Resolution (4 hours) and Problem Solving (4 hours).
Interventions
intervention group was taken to scenario-based simulat
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be a senior student at Gülhane Faculty of Nursing,
- Students' voluntary acceptance to participate in the research,
- To have taken the conflict management and problem solving course for the first time,
You may not qualify if:
- To have received training on conflict management and problem solving outside the course,
- Failure to complete any of the measurement tools
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Miray Aksu, Phd
Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Experimental and control groups will be determined using https://www.randomizer.org
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2024
First Posted
September 19, 2024
Study Start
March 29, 2024
Primary Completion
April 27, 2024
Study Completion
June 8, 2024
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share