The Effect of Straining Techniques on Women and Newborn
1 other identifier
interventional
354
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: To examine the effects of straining techniques on the duration of labor, perineal trauma status and newborn apgar score. Method: This study is a randomized controlled trial. The straining techniques were explained to the pregnant women who gave written consent to participate in the study and were randomly assigned to groups in the latent phase (natural, spontaneous, Valsalva), and the techniques were applied in the second phase of labor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Feb 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 24, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 5, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 13, 2022
CompletedOctober 13, 2022
October 1, 2022
1.1 years
October 5, 2022
October 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The distribution of the duration of the second phase according to the straining styles of women in labor
The distribution of the duration of the second phase was evaluated according to the pushing styles of the women who gave birth. The duration of the second stage of labor was calculated by keeping the hours and minutes according to the type of straining used. The time from the woman's full dilation (10 cm) to the birth of the baby was measured.
2-90 minute
The perineal trauma status according to the straining styles of women during labor
Perineal trauma status of women was evaluated according to their pushing styles during delivery. Episiotomy or laceration status after delivery of the placenta was evaluated by observation and examination method.
10-30 minute
The distribution of the mean Apgar Scores of the newborns according to the straining types of women during labor
The newborn apgar scores were evaluated according to the straining types of the women at the time of delivery. Apgar Score is the expression of the physiological condition of the infant at a certain time (ACOG, 2015). In studies examining the relationship between mortality rates and Apgar scores, it was shown that infants with low scores (0-2) had higher mortality rates (14%). Infants with high scores (7-10) had lower mortality rates (0.13%). The scoring system showed that overall Apgar scores of infants born with cesarean section were lower than those born vaginally (Apgar, 1966; Rubarth, 2012). Apgar developed this evaluation tool with 5 objective criteria (heart rate, respiration, reflex irritability, muscle tonus, and color). The Apgar Evaluation System is used in the 1st and 5th minutes after the infant is born. Apgar scores of 7-10 are reassuring, normal, 4-6 moderately abnormal, and 0-3 are considered low in term and preterm infants (ACOG, 2015).
1-5 minute
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The distribution of women's satisfaction and considerations about the practice according to the way they strain during labor
30 minute- 4 hours
Study Arms (3)
Valsalva Straining (Control Group)
EXPERIMENTALThe straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Valsalva straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Spontaneous Straining
EXPERIMENTALThe straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Spontaneous straining is supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Natural Straining
EXPERIMENTALThe straining techniques for the groups were explained by the researcher in line with the process steps in the latent phase. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Interventions
Valsalva, spontaneous and natural strainings are supported in 2nd stage of labor. Duration of delivery, perineal trauma status and Apgar Scores were evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- being at the gestational week,
- Having a singleton pregnancy
- Fetus in vertex position
- Being in the latent phase in the first stage of labor
- Planning and having a normal vaginal birth,
- Not having a diagnosed chronic physical disease,
- Not having a diagnosed psychiatric disease,
- No risk of risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly,
- Being literate,
- No communication problem
- Giving birth in the lithotomy position
- Volunteering to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- not in the week of pregnancy,
- Having multiple pregnancy
- Fetus out of vertex position
- Being in the latent phase in the first stage of birth,
- Having a cesarean section while planning a normal vaginal delivery,
- Having a diagnosed chronic physical illness,
- Having a diagnosed psychiatric illness,
- Having a risky pregnancy or fetal anomaly risk,
- illiteracy,
- Having a communication problem
- Giving birth in different positions
- Not willing to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sivas sample hospital
Sivas, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Links
- Second Stage of Labor
- Is directed open-glottis pushing more effective than directed closed-glottis pushing during the second stage of labor? A pragmatic randomized trial-the EOLE study.
- The impact of valsalva's versus spontaneous pushing techniques during second stage of labor on postpartum maternal fatigue and neonatal outcome.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gulbahtiyar Demirel
Cumhuriyet University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 5, 2022
First Posted
October 13, 2022
Study Start
February 24, 2020
Primary Completion
March 15, 2021
Study Completion
November 30, 2021
Last Updated
October 13, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share