NCT02648867

Brief Summary

This study will assess the ability for continuous electronic feedback to reduce the length of second stage labor and improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2015

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 3, 2016

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 7, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Status Verified

July 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

January 3, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 18, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Length of second stage labor in patients using the PushCoach device compared to patients blinded to the PushCoach device output

    The primary objective of this study is to measure the ability of immediate, quantitatively precise, visual, and auditory and haptic maternal feedback on fetal descent to reduce the overall length of second stage labor compared to women receiving standard verbal and manual feedback during second stage labor and reduce the incidence of pushing for longer than 60 minutes.

    Second stage of labor begins once the patient's cervix is completely dilated and ends once the baby is delivered. This time will be compared between patients.

Study Arms (2)

Patients receiving PushCoach feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients will receive continuous maternal feedback from the PushCoach device, which includes both audio and visual feedback of fetal head movement during the second stage of labor

Device: Continuous Maternal Feedback

Patients blinded to PushCoach feedback

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients will not receive continuous maternal feedback from the PushCoach device (it will be in place and collect data), but will receive normal feedback from the clinician during the second stage of labor.

Device: Continuous Maternal Feedback

Interventions

The PushCoach device consists of a modification of the standard fetal scalp electrode and a separate apparatus designed to detect movement of the fetal head by detecting movement of an FSE. The PushCoach will be attached to the patient by an adhesive pad over the sacrum and extend between the patient's legs approximately 2-3 inches from the vaginal introitus. It assesses the movement of the FSE attached to the fetal scalp during pushing. The amount of fetal movement will be measured and recorded. The PushCoach device is connected to a laptop computer which will provide optical and auditory feedback to the patient about descent of the fetal head with maternal expulsive efforts.

Also known as: PushCoach
Patients blinded to PushCoach feedbackPatients receiving PushCoach feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. Laboring nulliparous women who are \> 36 0/7 weeks estimated gestational age undergoing epidural or combined spinal epidural (CSE) placement for labor pain management.

You may not qualify if:

  • Women with multiple gestations.
  • Women with contraindications to pushing during second stage labor.
  • Women with contraindications to Fetal Spiral Electrode (FSE) placement including women with a face or compound presentation, known HIV, Hepatitis B or Active Herpes.
  • Women who do not plan to initiate pushing immediately (those who plan to "rest and descend" prior to initiation of pushing).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

University of Texas Medical Branch

Galveston, Texas, 77555, United States

Location

University of Utah Hospital

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132, United States

Location

Intermountain Medical Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84157, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • McRae-Bergeron CE, Andrews CM, Lupe PJ. The effect of epidural analgesia on the second stage of labor. AANA J. 1998 Apr;66(2):177-82.

    PMID: 9801480BACKGROUND
  • Johnson S, Rosenfeld JA. The effect of epidural anesthesia on the length of labor. J Fam Pract. 1995 Mar;40(3):244-7.

    PMID: 7876781BACKGROUND
  • Rouse DJ, Weiner SJ, Bloom SL, Varner MW, Spong CY, Ramin SM, Caritis SN, Peaceman AM, Sorokin Y, Sciscione A, Carpenter MW, Mercer BM, Thorp JM Jr, Malone FD, Harper M, Iams JD, Anderson GD; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Second-stage labor duration in nulliparous women: relationship to maternal and perinatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;201(4):357.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.08.003.

    PMID: 19788967BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Michael S Esplin, M.D.

    Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Erin Clark, M.D.

    University of Utah Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • George Saade, M.D.

    University of Texas

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2016

First Posted

January 7, 2016

Study Start

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2016

Study Completion

June 1, 2016

Last Updated

July 21, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations