Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrated Medicine Handbook for Self Care at Work

NCT05038384 | Withdrawn

• 2 other identifiers: 2020-0792NCI-2021-08920
• Study Type: observational
• Target: N/A
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This study investigates the usefulness of the Self Care at Work Handbook in order to generate an improved version. Information from this study may help researchers identify potential factors associated with perception and usefulness of the Self Care at Work Handbook.

Conditions

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm; Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

• Global perception of usefulness

  Will be assessed by survey question E, which has five options: very useful, useful, neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless. The main interest is the proportion of responders who select very useful and useful.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Frequency of consultation

  Will be assessed by survey question D, which has five options: never, once a month or less, a few times a month, a few times a week and daily. The main interest is the proportion of responders who select daily and a few times a week.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Perceived usefulness of individual items

  Will be assessed by survey question F 1-9. Frequency and proportion will be used to summarize each item. For responders who select neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless, additional questions about whether one item should be retained, discarded or modified will be summarized using frequency and proportion. Comments or suggestions will be collected for qualitative analysis.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Adherence to individual items

  Will be assessed by survey question G 1-9. Frequency and proportion will be used to summarize each item. For responders who select neither useful nor useless, useless and very useless, additional questions about whether one item should be retained, discarded or modified will be summarized using frequency and proportion. Comments or suggestions will be collected for qualitative analysis.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Personal ideas about the handbook

  Will be collected by survey question I and question J. Comments and suggestions will be collected and used to aggregate opinions toward handbook improvement.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Responders' self-reported professional satisfaction

  Will be assessed by survey question K, L1, and L3. Association between the perceived usefulness and professional satisfaction will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate. Association between the adherence and professional satisfaction will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Responders' profession

  Will be summarized by survey question A, and responders' demographics will be summarized by survey question B and C. Responders' work satisfaction after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will be examined by survey question L2 and L4. Association between the perceived usefulness and responders' profession/demographics/work satisfaction after COVID-19 will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate. Association between the adherence and responders' profession/demographics/work satisfaction after COVID-19 will be evaluated by Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test whichever appropriate.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

• Responders' global perceptions of usefulness and adherence to the handbook during COVID-19

  Will be assessed by survey question M, N and O, and frequency and proportion will be used to summarize the results.

  through study completion, an average of 1 year

Study Arms (1)

Observational (survey)

Participants complete a survey over 20 minutes.

Other: Survey Administration

Interventions

Survey Administration OTHER

Complete survey

Observational (survey)

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clinicians in the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine at M D Anderson Cancer Center

You may qualify if:

• Clinicians in the Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Medicine. This includes physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), and other clinical staff in the Supportive Care Center and Acute Palliative Care Unit

Sponsors & Collaborators

• M.D. Anderson Cancer Center: lead

Study Sites (1)

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

Location

Related Links

• MD Anderson Cancer Center

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hematologic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Site; Neoplasms; Hematologic Diseases; Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases

Study Officials

• Patricia Bramati, MD

  M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: CASE ONLY
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 24, 2021
• First Posted: September 9, 2021
• Study Start: December 3, 2020
• Primary Completion: March 30, 2023
• Study Completion: March 30, 2023
• Last Updated: March 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Locations

US (1)