To Assess the Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of Itacitinib Immediate Release Tablets in Participants With Primary or Secondary Myelofibrosis Who Have Received Prior Ruxolitinib and/or Fedratinib Monotherapy (LIMBER-213)
A 2-Part, Phase 2, Open-Label Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Itacitinib Immediate Release in Participants With Primary Myelofibrosis or Secondary Myelofibrosis (Post-Polycythemia Vera Myelofibrosis or Post-Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis) Who Have Received Prior Ruxolitinib and/or Fedratinib Monotherapy
2 other identifiers
interventional
4
7 countries
21
Brief Summary
This is a 2-part study. In Part 1, participants will be dosed at 2 different dose levels in order to select the RP2D for Part 2 of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Jul 2021
21 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 16, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 24, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 24, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 19, 2024
CompletedSeptember 2, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.1 years
November 10, 2020
August 20, 2024
August 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)
An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug-related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study treatment. A TEAE was defined as an AE that was reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study treatment.
up to 724 days
Part 1: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
A TEAE was defined as an AE that was reported for the first time or the worsening of a pre-existing event after the first dose of study treatment. The severity of AEs was assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 Grades 1 through 5. The investigator made an assessment of intensity for each AE and SAE reported during the study and assigned it to 1 of the following categories: Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.
up to 724 days
Part 2: Splenic Response Rate (SRR) at Week 24
SRR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a reduction in spleen volume (by imaging) of at least 35% when compared with Baseline.
Baseline; Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Part 2: Number of Participants With Any TEAE
up to at least 24 weeks
Part 2: Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE
up to at least 24 weeks
Part 2: Total Symptom Score (TSS) Response Rate at Week 24
Baseline; Week 24
Part 2: Mean Change (From Day 1 Versus Week 12 and Week 24) in the 5 Multi-item Functional Scale Scores and the Multi-item Global Health Status Scale Score (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Baseline; Weeks 12 and 24
Part 2: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved on the Week 24 Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Baseline; Week 24
Study Arms (2)
Part 1 : Dose Escalation of itacitinib
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be dosed at different dose levels with a maximum of up to 9 participants per dose level.
Part 2 : Dose Expansion of itacitinib
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will be dosed at the recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) identified in Part 1.
Interventions
itacitinb Immediate Release (IR) will be dosed orally twice a day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of primary MF meeting the 2016 WHO criteria for overt PMF or secondary MF (PPV-MF or PET-MF) meeting the 2008 IWG-MRT criteria.
- At least Intermediate 1 risk MF according to the DIPSS.
- Prior treatment with ruxolitinib and/or fedratinib monotherapy
- Currently receiving ruxolitinib or fedratinib monotherapy for PMF or secondary MF.
- Splenomegaly defined as palpable spleen at least 5 cm below the left costal margin or volume ≥ 450 cm3 on imaging assessed during screening.
- Allogeneic stem cell transplant not planned.
- Platelet is greater than or equal to 50 × 109/L at screening.
- Ability to comprehend and willingness to sign a written ICF for the study.
- Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children.
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment with a JAK inhibitor other than ruxolitinib or fedratinib
- Record of ≥ 10% myeloid blasts in the peripheral blood (on peripheral blood smear) or bone marrow prior to or at the time of screening
- For participants on ruxolitinib or fedratinib, unable to be tapered from that treatment over the course of 14 days without corticosteroids, hydroxyurea, or other agents
- Treatment with ruxolitinib, fedratinib or other MF-directed therapy (approved or investigational) within 2 weeks of Day 1
- Prior splenectomy or splenic irradiation within 6 months before receiving the first dose of itacitinib
- Unable or unwilling to undergo serial MRI or CT scans for spleen volume measurement
- Unable or unwilling to complete MFSAF v4.0 diary on a daily basis during the study
- ECOG performance status ≥ 3
- Life expectancy less than 24 weeks
- Not willing to receive RBC or platelet transfusions
- Participants with laboratory values at screening outside of protocol defined ranges
- Significant concurrent, uncontrolled medical condition
- Participants with impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac disease unless approved by medical monitor/sponsor
- History or presence of an abnormal ECG that, in the investigator's opinion, is clinically meaningful
- Chronic or current active infectious disease requiring systemic antibiotics, antifungal, or antiviral treatment.
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (21)
Tulane University
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Rcca Md, Llc
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817, United States
Midamerica Cancer Care
Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, United States
New Jersey Hematology Oncology Associates Llc
Brick, New Jersey, 08724-3009, United States
Baptist Cancer Center
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120, United States
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37235, United States
Texas Oncology - Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246-2092, United States
Renovatio Clinical Consultants Llc
Spring, Texas, 77380, United States
Interne 1 - Hematologie Mit Stammzelltransplantation, Hemostaseologie Und Medizinische Onkologie Ord
Linz, 70376, Austria
Cliniques Universitaires Ucl Saint-Luc
Brussels, 01000, Belgium
Jessa Ziekenhuis
Hasselt, 03500, Belgium
AZ DELTA
Roeselare, 08800, Belgium
Chu Ucl Namur University Hospital Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 05530, Belgium
Universitaetsmedizin Greifswald
Greifswald, 17475, Germany
Universitatsklinikum Halle (Saale)
Halle, 06120, Germany
Istituto Di Ricovero E Cura A Carattere Scientifico (Irccs) Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132, Italy
Aou San Giovanni Di Dio E Ruggi
Salerno, 84131, Italy
Treviso Hospital
Treviso, 31100, Italy
Pratia Hematologia Katowice
Katowice, 40-519, Poland
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041, Spain
Hospital Universitari I Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46000, Spain
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The sponsor terminated study enrollment following an assessment regarding the expected duration of recruitment for the Phase 2 portion of the study combined with the availability of other study options for this patient population.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- 1-855-463-3463
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2020
First Posted
November 16, 2020
Study Start
July 12, 2021
Primary Completion
August 24, 2023
Study Completion
August 24, 2023
Last Updated
September 2, 2025
Results First Posted
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be shared after the primary publication or 2 years after the study has ended for market authorized products and indications.
- Access Criteria
- Data from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described in the Data Sharing section of the www.incyteclinicaltrials.com website. For approved requests, the researchers will be granted access to anonymized data under the terms of a data sharing agreement.
Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency