Adjustable Gravitational vs. Adjustable Differential Pressure Valves in iNPH
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of the study is to verify theoretical benefit of ventriculoperitoneal shunting with MIETHKE M.blue® valve in patients with iNPH. The study is designed to assess walking and balance, urinary function, cognitive performance and quality of life before and after shunting and compare the results between the patients with MIETHKE M.blue® and MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®) valves.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 16, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2023
CompletedJune 16, 2020
June 1, 2020
1 year
June 10, 2020
June 13, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Change in the Dutch Gait scale in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Gait Scale, a useful quantitative measure of gait impairment in NPH patients, is a component of a larger measure developed as part of the Dutch normal pressure hydrocephalus study (Boon et al., 1997). The Gait Scale evaluates various aspects of gait, including walking speed, number of steps, stride length, stance, foot-floor clearance, balance, tandem walking ability, turning ability, and start hesitation in 10m of walking. (Ravdin et al., 2008) The score consists of 3 subcategories and ranges 2-40 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Month 3/Year 1
Change in MoCA in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a widely used screening assessment for detecting cognitive impairment. It was created in 1996 by Ziad Nasreddine in Montreal, Quebec. The MoCA assesses several cognitive domains. Score ranges 0-30 points with lower scores indicating more severely impaired cognitive skills.
Month 3/Year 1
Change in ICIQ UI-SF in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity, impact on quality of life (QoL) and simple estimation of a cause of urinary incontinence in men and women. The score ranges 0-21 points with higher score indicating more severe impairment.
Month 3/Year 1
Change in Kiefer Score in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment
Month 3/Year 1
Change in SF12 v 2.0 Health Survey in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
The SF-12® V2 Health Survey (SF-12 v2.0) (Ware, Kosinski, Turner-Bowker, \& Gandek, 2002) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess generic health outcomes from the patient's perspective. Generic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures like the SF-12 assess general health and well-being \[or health-related quality of life (HRQOL)\], including the impact of any and all illnesses on a broad range of functional domains. The SF-12 v2 consists of a subset of 12 items from the SF-36® Health Survey (SF-36) (Ware \& Sherbourne, 1992; Ware, Snow, Kosinski, \& Gandek, 1993) covering the same eight domains of health outcomes, including physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH).
Month 3/Year 1
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Postoperative changes in valve settings in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
1 Year
Overdrainage in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
1 Year
Shunt revisions in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
1 Year
Shunt related infections in MIETHKE M.blue® vs. MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
1 Year
Study Arms (2)
MIETHKE M.blue®
EXPERIMENTALMIETHKE proGAV 2.0® (with SA 2.0®)
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE M.blue® valve.
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV 2.0® valve that will be implanted together with a shunt-assistant SA 2.0®.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of patients (between 60 and 85 years old)
- Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait and one other symptom from Hakim-Adams triad (incontinence or dementia)
- maximal initial pressure of 20 cmH2O during lumbar infusion test
- Rout during LIT \>9mmHg/ml\*min
- at least 15% improvement in Gait scale score after ELD
- Conclusion of neuropsychological examination suggestive of iNPH (based on MoCA, Test of phonemic and verbal fluency, RAVLT, ROCFT, TMT A and B, Subtest of WAIS III, GDS)
You may not qualify if:
- Aetiology of hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus - history of meningitis or subarachnoid haemorrhage, obstructive type of hydrocephalus - eg aqueductal stenosis, Blake's pouch cyst)
- Intracranial tumor
- Other neurodegenerative diseases may be present (AD, Parkinson's disease, Lewy body dementia, Progressive supranuclear palsy and cerebrovascular diseases), however have to be mild and evaluated in neurological, neuropsychological examinations and on MRI
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neurosurgical department of the Central Military Hospital, 1st Faculty of Medicine of Charles University
Prague, 16902, Czechia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2020
First Posted
June 16, 2020
Study Start
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion
January 1, 2021
Study Completion
January 1, 2023
Last Updated
June 16, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06