A Randomized Cross-over Study for Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
ARCS NPH
Efficacy of Shunt Surgery in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: a Randomized Cross-over Study
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The goal of our study is to verify the effectiveness of the shunt and to identify the most sensitive criteria to select patients for surgery. The study is designed to assess improvement in walking and balance (gait), urinary function and memory after shunting. In addition, the study aims to identify the most accurate and sensitive tools to measure improvement for our patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 31, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 26, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 2, 2018
CompletedNovember 2, 2018
October 1, 2018
4.7 years
January 31, 2013
August 17, 2018
October 31, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Tinetti Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt
The Tinetti tool test measures walking and balance. It is designed to determine an elders risk for falls within the next year. It takes about 8-10 minutes to complete. The patient is asked to complete the gait portion first with the evaluator walking close behind the elder and evaluating gait steppage and drift. The patient is then asked to complete the balance portion with the evaluator again standing close by the patient (towards the right and in front). The patient is then asked to sit and the score is then totaled.The higher the score, the better the performance. Scoring is done on a three point scale with a range on each item of 0-2 with 0 representing the most impairment. Individual scores are then combined to form three scales: a Gait Scale, a Balance Scale and then and overall Gait and Balance score. The maximum score for gait is 12 points while the maximum for Balance is 16 points with a total maximum for the overall score of 28 points.
6 weeks
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt
The TUG evaluation measures walking and balance. The patient is timed while they rise from an arm chair (approximate seat height 46 cm), walk at a comfortable and safe pace to a line on the floor three meters away, turn and walk back to the chair and sit down again. The patient walks through the test once before being timed to become familiar with the test. The subject wears his regular footwear and uses a walking aid (cane or walker) if necessary. A faster time indicates a better functional performance and a score of ≥13.5 seconds is used as a cut-point to identify those at increased risk of falls.
6 weeks
Medical College of Virginia (MCV) Gait Grade on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt
The MCV gait grade evaluation measures balance and walking. The score ranges from 1 to 6 with higher values suggesting worse gait performance.
6 weeks
Kiefer Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt
The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment
6 weeks
Kubo Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt
The Kubo tool measures your symptoms in three categories: cognitive (attention and memory), gait/balance and urinary function.The score ranges from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Open Shunt
EXPERIMENTALThe programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be open at this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.
Closed Shunt
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be closed during this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.
Interventions
The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA® valve and crossed over at 6 weeks. The open shunt will be adjusted to be closed. The closed shunt will be adjusted to open.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age of Patients ( between 60 to 85 years old)
- Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait impairment
- Informed consent from patient
You may not qualify if:
- Etiology for hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
- Patients not capable of providing an informed consent.
- History of intra-cerebral hemorrhage
- Cardiac Pacemaker
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Aesculap, Inc.collaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Rhode Island Hospitalcollaborator
- Virginia Commonwealth Universitycollaborator
- Henry Ford Health Systemcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21284, United States
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Virgina Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23220, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Daniele Rigamonti, MD FACS
- Organization
- Johns Hopkins University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Daniele Rigamonti, MD FACS
Johns Hopkins University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Jennifer Lu
Johns Hopkins University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 31, 2013
First Posted
February 26, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
September 14, 2017
Study Completion
September 14, 2017
Last Updated
November 2, 2018
Results First Posted
November 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10