NCT01798641

Brief Summary

The goal of our study is to verify the effectiveness of the shunt and to identify the most sensitive criteria to select patients for surgery. The study is designed to assess improvement in walking and balance (gait), urinary function and memory after shunting. In addition, the study aims to identify the most accurate and sensitive tools to measure improvement for our patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
48

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 31, 2013

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2013

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 14, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 14, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 2, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

November 2, 2018

Status Verified

October 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

January 31, 2013

Results QC Date

August 17, 2018

Last Update Submit

October 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

HydrocephalusCross-over

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Tinetti Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt

    The Tinetti tool test measures walking and balance. It is designed to determine an elders risk for falls within the next year. It takes about 8-10 minutes to complete. The patient is asked to complete the gait portion first with the evaluator walking close behind the elder and evaluating gait steppage and drift. The patient is then asked to complete the balance portion with the evaluator again standing close by the patient (towards the right and in front). The patient is then asked to sit and the score is then totaled.The higher the score, the better the performance. Scoring is done on a three point scale with a range on each item of 0-2 with 0 representing the most impairment. Individual scores are then combined to form three scales: a Gait Scale, a Balance Scale and then and overall Gait and Balance score. The maximum score for gait is 12 points while the maximum for Balance is 16 points with a total maximum for the overall score of 28 points.

    6 weeks

  • Timed Up and Go (TUG) Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt

    The TUG evaluation measures walking and balance. The patient is timed while they rise from an arm chair (approximate seat height 46 cm), walk at a comfortable and safe pace to a line on the floor three meters away, turn and walk back to the chair and sit down again. The patient walks through the test once before being timed to become familiar with the test. The subject wears his regular footwear and uses a walking aid (cane or walker) if necessary. A faster time indicates a better functional performance and a score of ≥13.5 seconds is used as a cut-point to identify those at increased risk of falls.

    6 weeks

  • Medical College of Virginia (MCV) Gait Grade on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt

    The MCV gait grade evaluation measures balance and walking. The score ranges from 1 to 6 with higher values suggesting worse gait performance.

    6 weeks

  • Kiefer Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt

    The Kiefer is a modified clinical grading tool that measures the severity of the three key symptoms (mental deficits, gait disturbance, incontinence) and two additional minor symptoms (headache and dizziness). The overall score may reach values between 0 and 24, with higher scores indicating more severe impairment

    6 weeks

  • Kubo Score on Open Shunt vs. Closed Shunt

    The Kubo tool measures your symptoms in three categories: cognitive (attention and memory), gait/balance and urinary function.The score ranges from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Open Shunt

EXPERIMENTAL

The programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be open at this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.

Device: MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®

Closed Shunt

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The programmable valve, MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®, will be closed during this time. The adjustment is done in the out-patient clinic.

Device: MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA®

Interventions

The programmable shunt will be adjusted through the MIETHKE proGAV® / MIETHKE proSA® valve and crossed over at 6 weeks. The open shunt will be adjusted to be closed. The closed shunt will be adjusted to open.

Closed ShuntOpen Shunt

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age of Patients ( between 60 to 85 years old)
  • Clinically suspected Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) with at least gait impairment
  • Informed consent from patient

You may not qualify if:

  • Etiology for hydrocephalus other than idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
  • Patients not capable of providing an informed consent.
  • History of intra-cerebral hemorrhage
  • Cardiac Pacemaker

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21284, United States

Location

Henry Ford Health System

Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States

Location

Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States

Location

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location

Virgina Commonwealth University

Richmond, Virginia, 23220, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Normal PressureHydrocephalus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Daniele Rigamonti, MD FACS
Organization
Johns Hopkins University

Study Officials

  • Daniele Rigamonti, MD FACS

    Johns Hopkins University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jennifer Lu

    Johns Hopkins University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2013

First Posted

February 26, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 14, 2017

Study Completion

September 14, 2017

Last Updated

November 2, 2018

Results First Posted

November 2, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-10

Locations