Study Stopped
Funding was withdrawn as number of subjects enrolled did not meet expectation
Factors Predicting Response to Shunting in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
NPH
3 other identifiers
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The research project is designed to determine which combination of tests will enable physicians to predict whether a patient with symptoms of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) will improve with a shunt.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2006
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2006
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 3, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 12, 2021
CompletedJanuary 12, 2021
December 1, 2020
3.1 years
January 3, 2008
April 15, 2019
December 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Evans Ratio
A brain CT scan is obtained after the first week to ten days and the shunt is adjusted according to the patients signs and symptoms. Prior to any downward adjustment of the shunt valve (which allows more CSF drainage), a brain CT is obtained to look for subdural hematoma or effusion. If any type of subdural collection is found, the valve pressure is increased (to reduce CSF flow) until the collection resolves.
initial and follow-up visits
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy
30 min per clinic visit
Study Arms (1)
Comparison for patients of lumbar drain and shunt surgery
EXPERIMENTALSubjective comparisons made for patients - before and after external lumbar drain, before and after shunt surgery. Device: Programmable Shunt Insertion (Codman Medtronic) Behavioral: Assessments in physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy Follow-up testing to be administered by trained physician assistant in the outpatient setting on an approximately monthly basis: 10m walk, timed up-and-go, mini-mental status exam, 9-hole grooved pegboard, motor visual perception test (MVPT), modified rankin score (MRS)
Interventions
Medical Device - Shunt insertion surgery of adjustable valve and laparoscopic assistance for placement of peritoneal catheter. Patient will be brought to operating room suite where general anesthesia is induced. Patient will be placed with a small roll on shoulder, supine, on the operating room table. Patient's head will be turned with the parietal area uppermost in the field. Patient will be prepared and draped in the usual sterile fashion. Site prep includes parietooccipital area, side of neck, chest, and entire abdomen. Ventricular catheter placed and then attached to shunt valve. Catheter is then fitted over grooved blue burr hole guide. Excess catheter pulled down to pull valve into pocket on the skull. Sterile dressings applied.
Follow-up testing to be administered by trained Physician Assistant in the outpatient setting on an approximately monthly basis: 10m walk, timed up-and-go, Mini-Mental Status Exam, 9-hole Grooved Pegboard, Motor Visual Perception Test (MVPT), Modified Rankin Score (MRS)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Walking difficulties in both legs which has developed gradually, not explained by other conditions, either in combination with mental impairment and urinary incontinence
- Brain CT or MRI findings of enlarged ventricles compared to established standards (minimum Evans ratio of 0.30 as measured by reviewing films)
- Mental impairment must be mild to moderate, emerging with or after the walking difficulties
- Age \> or = 18 years old
- MMSE (Mini-mental status exam): \< or = 10
- Urinary incontinence
You may not qualify if:
- No or only minimal walking difficulties combined with severe dementia
- Severe medical problems with limited life expectancy (less than six months)
- Contraindications to surgery
- Lack of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Irvine - Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Chris Nishi Clinical Trials Coordinator
- Organization
- University of California, Irvine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Pare, MD, FRCSC
UC Irvine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 3, 2008
First Posted
February 13, 2008
Study Start
March 1, 2006
Primary Completion
April 1, 2009
Study Completion
April 1, 2009
Last Updated
January 12, 2021
Results First Posted
January 12, 2021
Record last verified: 2020-12