Clinical Performance of Zirconia Reinforced GI Versus Conventional Viscous GI in Geriatric Patients
Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Reinforced Versus Conventional Viscous Glass Ionomer in Posterior Restorations of Geriatric Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of Zirconomer Improved GI restoration compared to Conventional viscous GI restoration in geriatric patients with Posterior carious lesions in class I or II cavities
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedFebruary 6, 2024
February 1, 2024
1 year
March 4, 2020
February 5, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical performance
clinical performance of the Glass Ionomer restorations using modified USPHS criteria
1 year
Study Arms (2)
zirconomer improved
EXPERIMENTALzirconia reinforced glass ionomer restoration
ketac molar quick aplicap
ACTIVE COMPARATORconventional viscous glass ionomer restoration
Interventions
glass ionomer restoration reinforced with nano-zirconia particles to improve strength and esthetics
highly viscous glass ionomer with improved mechanical properties than the conventional GI
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range 60-80 years
- Geriatric patients with Class I or II Posterior carious lesions.
- Males or Females.
- Pulp asymptomatic vital carious posterior teeth.
- Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- Age range less than 60 years.
- Disabilities.
- Deep extensive carious cavities that may lead to fracture of the tooth or pulpal affection.
- Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
- Heavy smoking.
- Lack of compliance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Doaa Abdou
Giza, 12573, Egypt
Related Publications (5)
Klinke T, Daboul A, Turek A, Frankenberger R, Hickel R, Biffar R. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016 May 8;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8.
PMID: 27156000BACKGROUNDWalia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746.
PMID: 27461814BACKGROUNDAlbeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
PMID: 30034008BACKGROUNDde Franca Lopes CMC, Schubert EW, Martins AS, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Chibinski ACR, Wambier DS. Randomized Clinical Trial of ART Class II Restorations Using Two Glass Ionomer Cements: One-Year Follow-Up. Pediatr Dent. 2018 Mar 15;40(2):98-104.
PMID: 29663908BACKGROUNDFriedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011 Oct;27(10):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
PMID: 21840585BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2020
First Posted
March 6, 2020
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
February 6, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share