Effect of Opioid Infusion Rate on Abuse Liability Potential of Intravenous Hydromorphone for Cancer Pain
2 other identifiers
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In cancer inpatient settings, intravenous (IV) opioids are frequently administered in a bolus fashion in order to obtain immediate pain relief. However, data on the abuse liability (AL) potential of IV opioids in cancer patients is limited. No study has investigated the effect of different IV infusion rates on AL potential in patients receiving parenteral opioids for pain control. This phase IV trial will determine the AL potential of a slow IV hydromorphone (SH) bolus administration compared with a fast IV hydromorphone (FH) bolus administration among inpatients with cancer pain. It will also determine the analgesic efficacy and adverse effect profiles of SH versus FH bolus infusions, and explore the relationship between pharmacogenetics and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of hydromorphone. This study will eventually help develop evidence-based guidelines regarding the best style of IV opioid administration which will achieve the most optimal pain control while avoiding the undesirable complication of nonmedical opioid use
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2020
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2027
December 26, 2025
December 1, 2025
7.3 years
March 3, 2020
December 23, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Abuse liability potential of SH bolus versus FH bolus (from the "DRUG LIKING" scale of the DEQ questionnaire)
This will be measured by: The difference of peak AL scores (maximum score assessed among the measures at 15, 30, 60, and 120 minutes per participant) of the 'drug LIKING' scale in the DEQ-5 questionnaire between the two treatment groups. (For each patient: difference = Max Scale SH+FP - Max Scale FH+SP). If no evidence of carryover effect, a paired t-test will be used. Otherwise a 2-sample t-test will be used only examining differences during the first period of treatment.
From baseline up to 120 minutes post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Abuse liability potentials of SH bolus versus FH bolus (from the other scales of the DEQ questionnaire)
From baseline up to 120 minutes post intervention
Analgesic efficacy
From baseline up to 120 minutes post-intervention
Adverse effect
From baseline up to 120 minutes post-intervention
Abuse liability potential among patients who achieved successful analgesia
From baseline up to 120 minutes post-intervention
Plasma concentration (Cmax) and peak (maximal) plasma concentration (Tmax) of hydromorphone metabolite H3G
From baseline up to 120 minutes post-intervention
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Group A (hydromorphone, placebo)
EXPERIMENTALTREATMENT PHASE I: Patients receive hydromorphone IV over 2 minutes and placebo IV over 15 minutes. TREATMENT PHASE II: Patients receive hydromorphone IV over 15 minutes and placebo IV over 2 minutes.
Group B (hydromorphone, placebo)
EXPERIMENTALTREATMENT PHASE I: Patients receive hydromorphone IV over 15 minutes and placebo IV over 2 minutes. TREATMENT PHASE II: Patients receive hydromorphone IV over 2 minutes and placebo IV over 15 minutes.
Interventions
Given IV after
Given IV after
Ancillary studies
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Hospitalized patients with diagnosis of cancer
- History of moderate to severe cancer related pain, defined as Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score \>= 4/10
- Receiving no or only on as needed doses of opioids
- Normal cognitive status, defined as a normal state of arousal and an absence of obvious clinical findings of confusion, memory deficits or concentration deficits or a Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS) score of \< 13
- Ability to read and communicate in the English language
- Written informed consent from patient
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to opioids, or history of opioid allergy
- Inability to secure IV access
- Known history or evidence of nonmedical opioid use (e.g. abuse, misuse, addiction)
- Oxygen saturations \< 92% or respiratory rate \< 12 breaths/minute on initial assessment
- Resting heart rate \> 120 on initial assessment
- Systolic blood pressure \> 180 \< 90 mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 100 \< 60 mmHg on initial assessment
- Patients receiving scheduled chronic opioid therapy (defined as the treatment of pain with opioids for \>= 7 days)
- Moderate to severe renal insufficiency (defined as glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 60 ml/min/1.73 m\^2)
- Hepatic insufficiency (defined as alanine aminotransferase \[ALT\] or aspartate aminotransferase \[AST\] \> 3 times the highest normal value, or total bilirubin \> 1.5 times the highest normal value)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- M.D. Anderson Cancer Centerlead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joseph A Arthur, MD
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants and study staff
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2020
First Posted
March 5, 2020
Study Start
September 10, 2020
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Last Updated
December 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12