Muscle Activity and Kinematic Changes With Dry Needling
Changes in Muscle Activity, Squat, and Gait Kinematics After Dry Needling Treatment of the Low Back: A Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study assesses the effects of dry needling with electrical stimulation to the low back on muscle activity and changes in movement. The investigators hypothesize that dry needling and electrical stimulation will elicit changes in muscle activity as well as changes in movement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started Dec 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 16, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 22, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 16, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2021
CompletedAugust 31, 2021
August 1, 2021
1.5 years
February 22, 2020
August 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Muscle activity changes
activity measured and quantified from the amplitude (mV) of the surface EMG electrodes
pre/ post dry needling treatment. Participants' EMG will be recorded over a series of movements of the lumbar spine, will immediately be dry needled with electrical stimulation for up to 10 minutes, then will be immediately reassessed. Total time 2 hours
Kinematic changes
Measurement of lumbopelvic angles during range of motion activities
Participants kinematics will be recorded over a series of movements of the lumbar spine, will immediately be dry needled with electrical stimulation for up to 10 minutes, then will be immediately reassessed. Total time 2 hours
Study Arms (1)
Dry needling with electrical stimulation
EXPERIMENTALUse of dry needles (this is the generic name for sterile, solid filament needles) are inserted into the lumbar multifidi. Intramuscular electrical stimulation will then be applied by attaching a six-lead electrical stimulation unit to the needles. Electrical stimulation will be applied through the needles at the participant's desired frequency (between 4-6 Hz) and for up to 10 minutes total.
Interventions
Paravertebral dry needling to L3, 4, 5 multifidi. Electrical stimulation will be applied through the needles for up to 10 minutes total or to the participant's tolerance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- English speaking individuals between the ages of 18 and 60 years old
- without current complaint of low back pain
- no history of low back or lower extremity surgery
You may not qualify if:
- individuals with current complaint of low back pain,
- lumbar radicular symptoms
- history of low back surgery or lower extremity surgery
- pregnancy or planning to become pregnant,
- currently taking immunosuppressant or anticoagulation use with INR not within therapeutic range
- needle phobia
- osteoporosis will be excluded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LSU Health Science Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71103, United States
Related Publications (19)
Association APT. Dry needling in clinical practice:an educational resource paper. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association; 2013.
BACKGROUNDTherapy FoSBoP. Dry Neelding Resource Paper (Intramuscular Manual Therapy). 4th ed. Alexandria, VA: Federation of State Boards of Physical Therapy; 2013.
BACKGROUNDCaldwell J. Attorney General Opinion 14-0216. In: Justice2015.
BACKGROUNDKoppenhaver SL, Walker MJ, Su J, McGowen JM, Umlauf L, Harris KD, Ross MD. Changes in lumbar multifidus muscle function and nociceptive sensitivity in low back pain patient responders versus non-responders after dry needling treatment. Man Ther. 2015 Dec;20(6):769-76. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
PMID: 25801100BACKGROUNDAbbaszadeh-Amirdehi M, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Olyaei G, Nourbakhsh MR. Neurophysiological and clinical effects of dry needling in patients with upper trapezius myofascial trigger points. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017 Jan;21(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PMID: 28167189BACKGROUNDHaser C, Stoggl T, Kriner M, Mikoleit J, Wolfahrt B, Scherr J, Halle M, Pfab F. Effect of Dry Needling on Thigh Muscle Strength and Hip Flexion in Elite Soccer Players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017 Feb;49(2):378-383. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001111.
PMID: 27685009BACKGROUNDDunning J, Butts R, Young I, Mourad F, Galante V, Bliton P, Tanner M, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Periosteal Electrical Dry Needling as an Adjunct to Exercise and Manual Therapy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin J Pain. 2018 Dec;34(12):1149-1158. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000634.
PMID: 29864043BACKGROUNDUnverzagt C, Berglund K, Thomas JJ. DRY NEEDLING FOR MYOFASCIAL TRIGGER POINT PAIN: A CLINICAL COMMENTARY. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Jun;10(3):402-18.
PMID: 26075156BACKGROUNDLiu L, Huang QM, Liu QG, Thitham N, Li LH, Ma YT, Zhao JM. Evidence for Dry Needling in the Management of Myofascial Trigger Points Associated With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Jan;99(1):144-152.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
PMID: 28690077BACKGROUNDJayaseelan DJ, Moats N, Ricardo CR. Rehabilitation of proximal hamstring tendinopathy utilizing eccentric training, lumbopelvic stabilization, and trigger point dry needling: 2 case reports. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;44(3):198-205. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4905. Epub 2013 Nov 21.
PMID: 24261928BACKGROUNDRainey CE. The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;8(2):145-61.
PMID: 23593553BACKGROUNDKoppenhaver SL, Walker MJ, Rettig C, Davis J, Nelson C, Su J, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Hebert JJ. The association between dry needling-induced twitch response and change in pain and muscle function in patients with low back pain: a quasi-experimental study. Physiotherapy. 2017 Jun;103(2):131-137. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 20.
PMID: 27623385BACKGROUNDDar G, Hicks GE. The immediate effect of dry needling on multifidus muscles' function in healthy individuals. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Apr 27;29(2):273-278. doi: 10.3233/BMR-150624.
PMID: 26406203BACKGROUNDGe HY, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Yue SW. Myofascial trigger points: spontaneous electrical activity and its consequences for pain induction and propagation. Chin Med. 2011 Mar 25;6:13. doi: 10.1186/1749-8546-6-13.
PMID: 21439050BACKGROUNDLucas KR, Rich PA, Polus BI. Muscle activation patterns in the scapular positioning muscles during loaded scapular plane elevation: the effects of Latent Myofascial Trigger Points. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Oct;25(8):765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
PMID: 20667633BACKGROUNDGe HY, Monterde S, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Latent myofascial trigger points are associated with an increased intramuscular electromyographic activity during synergistic muscle activation. J Pain. 2014 Feb;15(2):181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.10.009. Epub 2013 Nov 2.
PMID: 24189107BACKGROUNDIbarra JM, Ge HY, Wang C, Martinez Vizcaino V, Graven-Nielsen T, Arendt-Nielsen L. Latent myofascial trigger points are associated with an increased antagonistic muscle activity during agonist muscle contraction. J Pain. 2011 Dec;12(12):1282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.09.005. Epub 2011 Nov 11.
PMID: 22078789BACKGROUNDBaima J, Isaac Z. Clean versus sterile technique for common joint injections: a review from the physiatry perspective. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2008 Jun;1(2):88-91. doi: 10.1007/s12178-007-9011-2.
PMID: 19468878BACKGROUNDAdministration FaD. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. 2018; https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=880.5580. Accessed March 24, 2019.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
April J Brown, DPT
LSU Health Science Center Shreveport
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor of Physical Therapy, Clinical Instructor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 22, 2020
First Posted
March 4, 2020
Study Start
December 16, 2019
Primary Completion
June 16, 2021
Study Completion
June 16, 2021
Last Updated
August 31, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share