The Effect of Brain Anatomy on the Efficacy of Brain Stimulation Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to determine whether brain anatomy impacts the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) which is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation. TMS is used to stimulate different areas of the brain and it is well tolerated and generally a safe procedure. It has been studied by researchers for 20 plus years. This brain stimulation device and technique used in this study is an investigational device that has not been approved by the U.S. FDA for treating any muscle or nerve problems. A copy of the device brochure can be found at: https://www.magstim.com/product/rapid-family/
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable healthy
Started Nov 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 14, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 8, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 8, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2023
CompletedMay 3, 2024
May 1, 2024
1.7 years
October 7, 2020
September 6, 2023
May 1, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in Corticomotor Excitability With Active Stimulation on Bicep Muscle
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) will be used to determine level of corticomotor excitability
approximately 7 days
Change in Corticomotor Excitability With Sham Stimulation on Bicep Muscle
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) will be used to determine level of corticomotor excitability
approximately 7 days
Change in Corticomotor Excitability With Active Stimulation on Finger Muscle
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) will be used to determine level of corticomotor excitability
approximately 7 days
Change in Corticomotor Excitability With Sham Stimulation on Finger Muscle
The amplitude the motor evoked potentials (MEPS) will be used to determine level of corticomotor excitability
approximately 7 days
Study Arms (2)
Brain stimulation over bicep muscle than finger (FDI) muscle.
EXPERIMENTALBrain stimulation will occur over two sessions. Both sessions will occur with sham stimulation then active stimulation. There will be a 3 day rest period between the two muscle groups.
Brain stimulation over than finger (FDI) muscle than bicep muscle.
EXPERIMENTALBrain stimulation will occur over two sessions. Both sessions will occur with sham stimulation then active stimulation. There will be a 3 day rest period between the two muscle groups.
Interventions
repetitive non-invasive brain stimulation protocol which feels like many quick, light taps on your head
repetitive non-invasive brain stimulation protocol which feels like many quick, light taps on your head
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- nonimpaired individuals
- free of contraindications for MRI and TMS
You may not qualify if:
- musculoskeletal injury of the arm
- neurologic deficit affecting motor or sensory function
- concurrent severe medical illness
- diagnosis of SARS-CoV2, or symptoms consistent with COVID-19, or close contact with someone with SARS-CoV2 in the past 3 weeks
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Carrie Peterson
- Organization
- Virginia Commonwealth University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Carrie Peterson, PhD
Virginia Commonwealth University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Participants will not be able to tell the difference if they are being given active vs sham stimulation but will receive both.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 7, 2020
First Posted
October 14, 2020
Study Start
November 9, 2020
Primary Completion
July 8, 2022
Study Completion
July 8, 2022
Last Updated
May 3, 2024
Results First Posted
December 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share