Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Fronto-parietal Networks: Modulation by Mental State
TMScogMod
2 other identifiers
interventional
53
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to improve understanding of the way transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, affects the brain. The study hypothesis that when theta burst stimulation (TBS) is applied during a controlled mental state, network changes will be facilitated, compared to stimulation when mental state is uncontrolled. This study will focus on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and the associated frontoparietal network (FPN), which subserves cognitive control - the ability to flexibly adapt and regulate behavior, an ability known to be impaired in neuropsychiatric conditions such as depression and dementia. Healthy volunteers that qualify for this study will have psychological assessments and cognitive measures (due to Covid, some of these were done via teleconference), as well as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) scans, completed after administration of TMS. Participants will be asked to come in for a total of five visits that include; a screening and assessment visit; a baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan, followed by TMS session; Visits 3, 4, and 5 will be the experimental TMS session, followed by fMRI scan.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable healthy
Started Nov 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 8, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 11, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 29, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 29, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 6, 2023
CompletedOctober 6, 2023
September 1, 2023
2.4 years
July 3, 2019
July 17, 2023
September 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
2-back Minus 1-back Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent (BOLD) Activation, Voxelwise in FPN
Fronto-parietal network (FPN) defined by BOLD change while subject performed the n-back working memory task, contrasting high (2-back) versus low (1-back) loads. Using the SPM12 package, data were normalized per standard, open source routines. Using a General Linear Model framework, a model was estimated with regressors (after convolution with hemodynamic response function) for 2-back \& 1-back conditions for each subject to predict BOLD change each day (arm).For analysis of group effects, second-level, between-subject analyses on normalized images of the 2-back minus 1-back beta estimate from the first level were entered into regression models, with mean frame displacement as a co-variate of no-interest to test contrasts between the arms/interventions. Using a FPN mask, the eigenvalues from the second-level estimates were extracted and entered into the analysis as an outcome measure. Note: eigenvalues are arbitrary units. Larger values indicate more BOLD signal.
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Frontoparietal Network (FPN) Connectivity to Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (dlPFC) Theta Burst Stimulation (TBS) Target
Analysis of resting-state connectivity was performed used the CONN toolbox, using standard techniques to demonstrate connectivity between a spherical seed placed on each participant's locus of dlPFC stimulation, and the rest of the brain. Connectivity (correlations of BOLD signal) was first calculated for each participant, and then spatially averaged in MNI brain space, between participants. A 'cluster' of connectivity was identified, only if the number of voxels (thresholded at P \<0.001) exceeded the count of 25. The outcome measure here is a count of the number of clusters exceeding this threshold, across all subjects. It represents significant connectivity between the site of stimulation and that cluster in the brain, for all subjects.
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) at Stimulation Target
Regional cerebral blood flow measured at the site of theta burst stimulation (TBS) in milliliters per 100 mg tissue per minute
15 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Accuracy to 2-back
Correct responses to letter stimuli, as a percentage of all responses
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Secondary Outcomes (4)
2-back Minus 1-back BOLD Activation, Voxelwise in Whole Brain
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Measure Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) in FPN
15 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Median Reaction Time (RT) in 2-back
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
D-prime in 2-back
60 minutes after TMS during fMRI
Study Arms (3)
TMS to dlPFC, without a concurrent task
EXPERIMENTALTMS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) will be applied to the dlPFC, when subjects are in a resting state
TMS to vertex, without concurrent task
EXPERIMENTALTMS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) will be applied to the cerebral vertex, when subjects are in a resting state
TMS to dlPFC, during task
EXPERIMENTALTMS (intermittent theta burst stimulation) will be applied to the dlPFC, when subjects are engaged in the n-back working memory task
Interventions
Intermittent theta burst stimulation TMS applied to the cortex to excite cerebral cortex
Subjects perform an executive function task, in which they view the serial presentation of letters and decide whether or not a letter matches a letter presented 'n' letters back (2 letters or 1 letter)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Women of child bearing age can not be pregnant or trying to become pregnant
- Ability to tolerate small, enclosed spaces without anxiety
- Size compatible with scanner gantry, e. g. men over 6 feet tall that weigh more than 250 lbs, men under 6 feet tall that weigh over 220 lbs, women over 5'11" tall that weigh more than 220 lbs, or women under 5'10" tall that weigh more than 200 lbs. Subjects of these weights or greater typically have difficult fitting into the fMRI scanner properly
- Ability and willingness to give informed consent to participate
- Alcohol or drug dependence (if in remission for greater than 5 years)
You may not qualify if:
- History of past or current mental illness (except simple phobias)
- History of closed head injury, for example, loss of consciousness \> approximately 5 minutes, hospitalization, neurological sequela;
- Metals, implants or metallic substances within or on the body that might cause adverse effects to the subject in a strong magnetic field, or interfere with image acquisition (for example; aneurysm clips, retained particles or metal workers with exposures, neurostimulators, foil-backed transdermal patches, carotid or cerebral stents, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) shunts; magnetic dental implants, ferromagnetic ocular implants, pacemakers, and automatic implantable defibrillators).
- Prescription or non-prescription, with psychotropic effects (birth control medications allowed)
- First-degree family members with a history of epilepsy
- History of serious neurological illness or current medical condition that could compromise brain function, such as liver failure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Michiganlead
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48170, United States
Related Publications (1)
Taylor SF, Lee TG, Jonides J, Tso IF, Hernandez-Garcia L. Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Fronto-Parietal Networks: Modulation by Mental State. J Psychiatr Brain Sci. 2020;5:e200011. doi: 10.20900/jpbs.20200011. Epub 2020 May 26.
PMID: 32613082DERIVED
Limitations and Caveats
Because of technical problems, performance measure for accuracy and d-prime were not available for 24 subjects in the 'Active' condition.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Stephan Taylor
- Organization
- University of Michigan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Taylor, MD
University of Michigan
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- All subjects will receive all interventions in a cross-over design. The three intervention sessions (visits 3, 4 \& 5) will be given in counter-balanced order, stratified by gender. Subjects will be blind to the nature of the questions being asked; however, they will be told that different stimulation paradigms will be used, which will be evident to the subjects as they go through the procedures.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Psychiatry
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2019
First Posted
July 8, 2019
Study Start
November 11, 2019
Primary Completion
March 29, 2022
Study Completion
March 29, 2022
Last Updated
October 6, 2023
Results First Posted
October 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- De-identified data will be entered into the NDA within 1 year of the conclusion of the study.
- Access Criteria
- No additional access restrictions will be placed on the de-identified data beyond those that are standard for the NDA.
The PI will share information about this/these trial(s) via timely registration, updates, and results reporting in ClinicalTrials.gov in accordance with NIH policy. The PI will also upload data gathered in this proposal to an National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)-designated central data, NIMH Data Archive (NDA), as prescribed by NOT-MH-15-012, working with NIMH program to determine the timing and extent of data sharing. This includes formulation of an enrollment strategy that will obtain the information necessary to generate a Global Unique Identifier (GUID) for each participant. The consent form will include language indicating the intention to upload de-identified data into the central archive, and permission will be obtained from University of Michigan Institutional Review Board to do so. The budget includes a data manager to cover the costs of managing the data, building the data dictionary and harmonizing it with data structures.