Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Intensity on Leg Muscle Fatigability in Healthy Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a painless,non-invasive means of increasing brain excitability. It has been used for several years and in many populations to improve physical and psychological outcomes. Although many tDCS devices are capable of a range of stimulation intensities (e.g., 0 mA - 5 mA), the intensities currently employed in most tDCS research are ≤ 2 mA, which are sufficient to elicit measurable improvements; but, these improvements might be expanded at higher intensities. In the beginning, when the safety of tDCS was still being established for human subjects, careful and moderate approaches to stimulation protocols were warranted. However, recent work using stimulation at higher intensities, i.e. up to 4 mA, has been performed in many populations and was found to have no additional negative side-effects. Now that the safety of tDCS at higher intensities is better established, work exploring the differences in performance between moderate (i.e. 2 mA) and higher (i.e. 4 mA) intensities is necessary to determine if increasing intensity increases the effectiveness of the desired outcome. Prospective participants will include 40 healthy young adults (all right-side dominant) that will be recruited to complete four randomly ordered stimulation sessions (Baseline, 2 mA, 4 mA, and sham), separated by at least 5 days. Each session will involve one visit to the Integrative Neurophysiology Laboratory (INPL) and will last for approximately one hour. We expect data collection to last 6 months. The first session includes leg strength measurements and fatigue tasks of both legs, as well as a baseline 6 min walk test (6MWT) to determine fatigued walking characteristics. The following three sessions will include performing a random tDCS condition (2 mA, 4 mA, or sham) over the brain area that controls the participant's dominant leg for 15 minutes prior to and then throughout the duration of the fatigue task of the dominant leg (16-20 min total stimulation time). The fatigue task for the nondominant leg will be performed after a 10 minute energy recovery period. After the fatigue task has been completed for both legs, the participants will perform the 6MWT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy
Started May 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable healthy
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 24, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2020
CompletedJuly 8, 2021
July 1, 2021
2 months
March 23, 2020
July 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Distance walked in the 6 Minute Walk Test
Walk back and forth between two markers spaced 30 meters apart for six minutes
Through study completion, up to 6 months
Fatigue index from the isokinetic fatigue test
Perform 40 consecutive flexion and extension repetitions of the knee on the dominant leg. After a 10 minute rest, do the same task on the the non-dominant leg.
Through study completion, up to 6 months
Study Arms (3)
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is turned on (2 mA) for the 30 seconds at the beginning and the end of the trial, but stays at 0 mA in the intervening time.
2 mA
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is ramped up to 2 mA over the first 30 seconds and stays at 2 mA for the remainder of the stimulation time.
4 mA
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have the anode (active electrode) placed over the brain area the controls their dominant leg and the cathode (return electrode) above the ipsilateral eyebrow. Stimulation is ramped up to 4 mA over the first 30 seconds and stays at 4 mA for the remainder of the stimulation time.
Interventions
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) at the beginning and the end of a given stimulation period to control for potential placebo-like effects or participant expectation bias.
Uses weak electrical current (2 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Uses weak electrical current (4 mA intensity) to either increase or decrease brain excitability and improve functional or cognitive outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Young adult (18-30 yrs)
- right-side dominant
- able to independently walk for 6 min
- at least 30 min of moderate-intensity, physical activity on at least 3 days of the week for at least the last 3 months
- without chronic neurological, psychiatric, or medical conditions
- not taking any psychoactive medications
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant
- known holes or fissures in the skull
- metallic objects or implanted devices in the skull (e.g., metal plate)
- current student of study personnel
- under the direct supervision of study personnel
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig D Workman, PhD
University of Iowa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blind
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Postdoctoral Scholar
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2020
First Posted
March 25, 2020
Study Start
May 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 24, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2019
Last Updated
July 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07