NCT04223973

Brief Summary

Demonstration study of the interest of the MEDTRUM A7+ TouchCare insulin patch pump versus INSULET Omnipod® patch pump

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
93

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable diabetes-mellitus

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 11, 2019

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 13, 2020

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 29, 2020

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2021

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 16, 2024

Status Verified

March 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

December 11, 2019

Results QC Date

April 5, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 19, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

diabetes managementInsulin Pump

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Estimation of A1C (%) Based on Average Blood Glucose Measured by Continuous Glucose Sensor on the Last 10 Weeks

    A1C will be estimated by a Continuous Glucose Measurement (FreeStyle Libre®) for all patients, at baseline and end of the study (12 weeks). The main objective is to demonstrate Non-inferiority efficacy (PP then ITT) of Medtrum A7+ insulin patch pump vs Insulet Omnipod® insulin patch pump (2 randomized groups). For the primary outcome, A1C will be estimated and appear in percentage based on assessment done by a Continuous Glucose Monitoring system. The A1C obtained in real life for the group using the comparator pump (Omnipod®) is estimated at 7.8%. Assuming that blood glucose level will be the same with Medtrum pump and based on a defined non-inferiority margin ∆ = + 0.4 (following FDA Guidance for Industry Diabetes Mellitus: Developing Drugs and Therapeutic Biologics for Treatment and Prevention).

    Month 3

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Report Patients' Laboratory Hemoglobin A1C Difference Between Baseline and 3 Months

    Month 3

  • Compare The Time Spent in Range

    Month 3

  • Compare Patients Pump Satisfaction

    Month 3

  • Compare Patients PDM Satisfaction

    Month 3

  • Number of Participants With at Least One Pump Occlusion

    Month 3

Study Arms (2)

Active Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Using the Medtrum Pump A7+ during 3 months

Device: Medtrum A7+ insulin PumpBiological: Lab A1C

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

using the usual Insulet Patch pump

Biological: Lab A1C

Interventions

Use of the Medtrum pump during 3 months in combination with a CGM (Continuous Glucose Measurement)

Active Group
Lab A1CBIOLOGICAL

Measure of Lab A1C at baseline and end of study

Active GroupControl Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with type 1 or 2 diabetes, 18 years of age and over
  • Patients already equipped with Omnipod® ® (INSULET) insulin patch pump and Abbott FreeStyleLibre sensor®.
  • A1C ranking from : \>= 6,5% to \<= 9.5%
  • Any type of rapid insulin except FIASP (which can be substituted if necessary) with 60 IU max per day (unauthorized use of insulin supplements by pen injector)
  • Patient able to receive and understand study information, give written informed consent, and easily participate to the trial
  • Patient affiliated to the French social security system

You may not qualify if:

  • \- Patient already participating in another study
  • Patient under the protection of justice or under guardianship or curatorship
  • Type 2 diabetic patient requiring a daily insulin dose \> 60 IU
  • Patients not suitable for suing insulin pump such as: severe psychiatric disorders, rapidly progressing ischemic or proliferative retinopathy before laser treatment, and exposure to high magnetic fields
  • Patients allergic to nickel and adhesive
  • Pregnant women, breastfeeding women
  • Or any other criteria as appreciated by the study investigator.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre hospitalier Sud Francilien

Corbeil-Essonnes, Essones, 91100, France

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Amadou C, Melki V, Allain J, Clavel S, Gouet D, Chaillous L, Catargi B, Schaeplynck-Belicard P, Petit C, Thivolet C, Penfornis A. Performance and patients' satisfaction with the A7+TouchCare insulin patch pump system: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study. PLoS One. 2023 Aug 24;18(8):e0289684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289684. eCollection 2023.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Glucose Metabolism DisordersMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

15 patients were excluded from the PP Population due to protocol deviations (mainly premature discontinuation due to COVID 19 context), which occurred more frequently in the Touchcare group (13 patients vs 2 patients in the Omnipod group). Some differences in favour of the Omnipod pump may be explained since patients in this group used the Omnipod pump (and already satisfied with it) since several months or years, compared to only 1 to 3 months of use with the unknown Touchcare pump.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mrs Melanie MARMOUNIER-WILHLEM- Commercial DIrector
Organization
Medtrum France

Study Officials

  • Freddy PENFORNIS

    Centre Hospitalier Francilien, Corbeil

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Randomized controlled trial (RCT), open-label with two arms, multicentric national, prospective, non-inferiority methodology versus reimbursed comparator.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2019

First Posted

January 13, 2020

Study Start

January 29, 2020

Primary Completion

March 1, 2021

Study Completion

June 1, 2021

Last Updated

August 16, 2024

Results First Posted

August 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations